David Brodbeck wrote:
Kelson wrote:
Mail sent from to a few addresses that we never use for outgoing
mail is rejected with an Invalid bounce explanation. (Don't do this
with postmaster or abuse, or you'll probably end up listed on
RFC-ignorant.)
AFAIK you won't unless someone decides to report
I see this is already in bugzilla. Should we just depreciate that rule for
now? It is really screwing up my scores.
Ray Dzek
Network Operations Supervisor
Specialized Bicycle Components
PH: 408-782-5420
FX: 408-782-5421
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ray writes:
I see this is already in bugzilla. Should we just depreciate that rule for
now? It is really screwing up my scores.
As the bz bug says -- it's a symptom as much as anything else. so adding
support for the Received header format it
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain
names that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it
should. When the domain name is one that has multiple possibilities
that it can
On Thu, September 23, 2004 10:47, jenni baier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does anyone have 3.0 in RPM form? I can't find any links to RPM versions
on the site...
Thanks in advance...
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/spamassassin-3.0-10.i386.rpm
or
Thursday, September 23, 2004, 2:01:58 PM, Theo responded:
TVD On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Rob Kudyba wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin root# /usr/bin/spamassassin --lint -D
debug: config: read file //etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_html.cf
debug: config: read file
Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD ports for the new
SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is scheduled?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not think this is directly related to spamassassin, but googling
has produced hits all over the map from perl, to Berkeley DB, and none
seem to be recient.
I noticed that spamassassin was not learning after I did an upgrade to
perl 5.8.5. In running sa-learn with a -D I found that DB_File.pm
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD ports for the new
SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is scheduled?
The ports tree is currently frozen in preparation for Freebsd 5.3-Release,
so it may be a while.
(I recently asked when bind
Hi Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED],
you wrote on Thursday, 2004-09-23 17:00:08 -0400:
NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.0. It looks like you're using old modules
and/or old scripts.
Nuke anything spamassassin related, then install 3.0.0.
I renamed ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and
I am working on creating a drop-in replacement for the FreeBSD port,
although it is likely the committers will create their own in due time.
-Dan
--
I want to see how you see.
-SK, 6/2/99, 4:30 AM
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144
If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
have missed the fact that spamd has been moved
from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . However, the old version remains
in /usr/sbin which is often where your scripts expect to
Hi,
I have installed spamassassin 3.0 on an email gateway, I noticed on a
debug it threw out an error with the line
check_mx_attempts 0
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: check_mx_attempts 0
Is this option disabled or removed in 3.0?
Secondly, I have installed pyzor 0.4.0
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:30:19AM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
have missed the fact that spamd has been moved
from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . However, the old
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
have missed the fact that spamd has been moved
from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . However,
At 07:41 AM 9/24/2004, Chris Connell wrote:
Hi,
I have installed spamassassin 3.0 on an email gateway, I noticed on a
debug it threw out an error with the line
check_mx_attempts 0
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: check_mx_attempts 0
Is this option disabled or removed in 3.0?
On Friday, September 24, 2004, 6:59:37 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
Just got an email from our Host of SARE. They got their first donation and
wait for it..yes.it ended in .37 cents!! Wooot! LOL!!!
A.C. made the donataion. You rock bro! Shows you paid attention ;)
Our hosts
Gee, Chris, you're still sending to incubator. Spamassassin graduated!
Congratulations on the donation.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just got an email from our Host of SARE. They got their first donation and
wait for it..yes.it ended
Hi!
I'm trying to use pop3proxy with SA3, but I cannot see the x-spam headers.
Here is some more info.
I did a clean install of Activestate Perl 5.8.4.810 and SA3, following
instructions at http://www.openhandhome.com/howtosa300.html .
Spamassassin works: if I fire up a command prompt and
This morning I had over 7000 emails in my Linux server's outbound queue
which I deleted. My firewall log shows over 20,000 emails went out with a
SunTrust bank announce saying to login and enter your username and password.
I do not see the emails coming in like I would in a relay. How can I stop
I feel like I need to add, for the sake of others, that its a bad idea
to allow outside access to these two email addresses. Internal users,
or perhaps even just a few trusted individuals should be able to send
to these two addresses, but not the general internet population. I'm
guessing the
This question isn't really appropriate to a SpamAssassin forum.
For what it's worth, it sounds like someone exploited an Apache vuln on
your system and installed a mail generator. Given the severity of this
(ie you are sending out thousands of email phishing frauds) you should
probably take
* Jay Ehrhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This morning I had over 7000 emails in my Linux server's outbound queue
which I deleted. My firewall log shows over 20,000 emails went out with a
SunTrust bank announce saying to login and enter your username and password.
I do not see the emails coming in
At 10:39 AM 9/24/2004, Jay Ehrhart wrote:
This morning I had over 7000 emails in my Linux server's outbound queue
which I deleted. My firewall log shows over 20,000 emails went out with a
SunTrust bank announce saying to login and enter your username and password.
I do not see the emails coming
I have a number of email addresses that get only spam, so I've set them
up as spamtraps.
They are simply sendmail aliases that send to | /usr/bin/spamassassin -r.
When I manually run the spamassassin -r command, however, I get the
following...
$cat sample-spam.txt | spamassassin -r
Pyzor -
Joe Smith wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain
names that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it
should. When the domain name is one that has multiple possibilities
that it can reverse dns to then it doesn't work unless it happens to
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Joe Smith wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 when I use whitelist_from_rcvd with domain names
that reverse to only one possible domain it works just as it should. When the
domain name is one that has
--On Friday, September 24, 2004 11:33 AM -0400 Steve Prior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone else is going to run into this, sometime
yesterday speakeasy.net implemented default SPF records
for all of their DNS hosting customers.
I don't see it for the two domains they host for me. I did a
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:36:27 -0400 (EDT) Dan Mahoney, System Admin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The person running 1.2.3.4 has NO CLUE what they are doing. 1.2.3.4
should RDNS to whatever the hostname value of that machine is. This
should be the same as the HELO the machine uses when
With SA 3.0, using clear_headers in local.cf does not prevent the
X-Spam-Report: header from being inserted into spam messages. Is this
a bug or a feature? Below is my local.cf.
### +++
required_score 8.0
clear_headers
report_safe 0
use_dcc 0
use_pyzor 0
use_razor2 0
dns_available yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Ehrhart writes:
The non-deliverable reports are coming from my Linux apache user.
Non-deliverables usually come from root. I am running apache on the server
with forms. The forms software is the latest version and patches.
Can anybody
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:04:58AM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote:
I removed all SpamAssassin files earlier this evening and re-installed
using cpan. With hindsight, I believe I could have simply done what
you have suggested above. I run a SuSE 8.2 system, and persuading
manual configuration
Has anyone else seen a problem w/ spamd dying sometimes (after working
for a while)? I have been seeing this in the 3.0 rcs. I'm about to
upgrade to 3.0 release, but I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this.
Much more detailed information in bug #3667 (bugzilla.spamassassin.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Yardley writes:
Has anyone else seen a problem w/ spamd dying sometimes (after working
for a while)? I have been seeing this in the 3.0 rcs. I'm about to
upgrade to 3.0 release, but I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this.
Much more
We run a bunch of Win32 mail servers on our network. These servers
already have spam and virus filtering for local email delivery.
However, when a mailbox has it's mail forwarded off-net, the mail is
not filtered. As such, when a local users forwards their mailbox to
AOL, they then read their
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:36:27 -0400 (EDT) Dan Mahoney, System Admin
The person running 1.2.3.4 has NO CLUE what they are doing.
1.2.3.4 should RDNS to whatever the hostname value of that
machine is. This should be the same as the HELO the machine uses
when talking out to the outside
I just started using a postfix/mailscanner/SA setup to filter outbound
and inbound mail. Currently scanning about 35k messages per day. I'm a
long time windows user / short time linux user, but had no problem
getting it setup and running. I'm happy with the results, that's for
sure.
Justin Mason wrote:
Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's
packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from
ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its rpm spec moves
the file around as Debian does).
Actually, for any real package manager (ie, rpm or
On Friday 24 September 2004 08:52 am, Justin Mason wrote:
Bob Apthorpe writes:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION:
If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:37:31PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's
packaging of either perl (if it uses the defaults from
ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or SpamAssassin itself (if its rpm spec moves
the file around as
I am having a problem with 2.63 not using bayes. (NB: setup is using
individual data and triggering using .4ward, procmail and postfix with
no individual .sa and .procmail files) I have trained each of three
accounts with over 1000 ham and some 48K spam messages. SA is working
and tagging spam
I do not believe that is an issue. It only puts the bayes databases at
~/.spammer_toks and ~/.spammer_seen. sa-learn has not had a problem
loading the databases. They have grown everytime I have used it. I can't
see why spamd would have a problem with it.
Tom
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 03:40 PM
On Friday 24 September 2004 03:52 am, Alex S Moore wrote:
Since upgrading to 3.0, which is the greatest BTW, I have not had any
spam auto-learned. The keywords are correct and running spamassassin
with --lint reveals all is ok.
Is anyone else seeing this?
Alex
It seems to be working here
At 04:10 PM 9/24/2004, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
I do not believe that is an issue. It only puts the bayes databases at
~/.spammer_toks and ~/.spammer_seen. sa-learn has not had a problem
loading the databases. They have grown everytime I have used it. I can't
see why spamd would have a problem
As a another good step, just SA scan ALL incoming and outgoing mail.
Run a vulnerability scan against your server, nessus or sara against your
machine to find what is being exploited.
--
Luke Computer Science System Administrator
Security Administrator,College of Engineering
Montana State
I changed the path just in case. It was that way as a mistake anyhow.
Here is the output of lint. (it is exactly the same as with the other
paths so I am sure that is not the issue.) Note that it works there.
Although not when run through procmail. I think your idea about users is
on to
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 15:17, John Andersen wrote:
It seems to be working here Alex:
...
Are you sure it was started with autolearn support turned on?
(I think it is the default)...
Yes, it is turned on. Normally, learning from my
From: Gregory Zornetzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I recently installed spamcop 3.0.0 onto my unix account on an SGI IRIX 6.5
box. I'm using perl 5.8.5, and I generally read my email with pine,
though sometimes I'll remotely view it using Evolution through the
machine's IMAP server.
The
48 matches
Mail list logo
