Hello Kai,
Sunday, September 26, 2004, 2:17:37 PM, you wrote:
KS Robert Menschel wrote on Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:00:07 -0700:
We split them out this way specifically because file 0 gives the most
bang for the buck (er, computer resource), file 1 also gives good return
on the investment, and
On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 2:17:40 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
When I upgraded our first systems to
3.0 RCs earlier this month I immediately removed bigevil from
rules_du_jour and switched on SURBL. bigevil consumes the same amount of
RAM on 2.64 and I think it doesn't really give that much
Anyone using SA 3 with network tests enabled, Net::DNS
installed and URIDNSBL rules active (which they are by
default in 3.0.0) should stop using BigEvil.
The static domains in BigEvil are now in the SURBL list
ws.surbl.org which is enabled by default in SA 3.0.0 along
with all other
You can alternatively tell the SMTP proxy to deny anything from your
internal network except from individual machines (such as your RH 3 mail
server).
We also limit who can hit the DMZ perimeter SMTP servers at the firewall
level. Therefore only the Exchange servers (in our case) or our client
Hi,
While attempting to install 3.0 via MCPAN, everything seemed to go okay until:
Makefile:54: *** missing separator. Stop.
/usr/bin/make -- NOT OK
Running make test
Can't test without successful make
Running make install
make had returned bad status, install seems impossible
Now, I know,
Andy Norris wrote:
Hi,
While attempting to install 3.0 via MCPAN, everything seemed to go
okay until:
Makefile:54: *** missing separator. Stop.
/usr/bin/make -- NOT OK
Running make test
Can't test without successful make
Running make install
make had returned bad status, install seems
Seems you are still running the old spamassassin daemon script. Check in
the spamassassin build folder in cpan - mine is
~/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0/spamd - all the daemon scripts are
there. Pick the one for your OS (on Linux that will be redhat-rc-script.sh)
and copy it to where-ever
Hi,
I'm running exim on a Solaris box with mail for certain users being piped
through spamc (V2.63), which is using a newly built Fedora core 2 spamd
(V3.0.0) server. (This server did have 2.64 on, but was upgraded through CPAN).
I'm getting the following errors in the spamd server's log:
Sep
Thank you very much. The spammer was using an exploit in Formmail.cgi which
I use on my web site which has now been disabled. They crafted a message,
inserted it into the formmail on the web page which delivered it to sendmail
for delivery. Normally it would have gone to the local email account
On Monday, September 27, 2004, 7:57:27 AM, Sandy S. wrote:
URIDNSBL: query for dkcw.wneiis-planet.info took 2 seconds to look up
(multi.surbl.org.:dkcw.wneiis-planet.info)
debug: URIDNSBL: query for tvuu.wneiis-planet.info took 2 seconds to look up
(multi.surbl.org.:tvuu.wneiis-planet.info)
Any suggestions on how to activate the RelayCountry plug-in?
I've added this line to my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file ...
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
... and restarted spamd.
My messages, however, do not have any additional information that
indicates the country
-Original Message-
From: Bob Apthorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 3:30 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [sa-list] Re: Bundle::SpamAssassin
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:26:04 +0100 Julian Field
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. I tend
Matt Kettler wrote:
I don't believe the RelayCountry plugin adds anything visible to the
message.
Ok, I didn't get that from the docs (such as they are). I expected the
X-Relay-Countries header to be added to the message.
It adds the country code to the metadata that gets used as bayes tokens,
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-Dan
--
A mother can be an inspiration to her little son, change his thoughts,
his mind, his life, just with her gentle hum.
-No Doubt, Different People, from Tragic Kingdom
Dan Mahoney
spamhaus
-Original Message-
From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:53 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Preferred DNSBL
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
list.dsbl.org
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
cn.countries.nerd.dk
- --
Regards
Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Dan Mahoney, System Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/27/2004
11:52:41 AM:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-Dan
--
Sorted by number of hits, the first three are by far the big hitters. Had
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org for a while
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
Just one: Spamhaus SBL+XBL
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications www.speed.net
Title: How did this not get tagged??
I got the following in my headers.. I'm not sure how this could possibly score so low, with all the hits it received...
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_40,HTML_90_100,
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,OPTO_HEADER,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spamcop.net
njabl.org
spamhaus.org
ordb.org
recently took a lot of heat for using sorbs.net
As a person for whom the concept of DNS based blackholes is a little
troublesome I note it would not be wise for someone with corporate
customers to use a black hole that
Tim Boyer wrote:
Tim Boyer wrote to users@spamassassin.apache.org:
3. Do I have DNS lookup enabled? Yup:
# Enable or disable network checks
dns_available yes
skip_rbl_checks 0
rbl_timeout 15
Can't think of anything else to try.
Try checking
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
At 09:52 AM Monday, 9/27/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote -=
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-Dan
Ed
. . . . . . . .
I distrust
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: Goodbye old friend 2.4x!
LOL, it is official, I am taking my own advice. I am upgrading my live
server from 2.4x! And I think
When I run spamassassin -D --lint I am noticing this message:
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 0
Argument isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 572.
Spamassasin still seems to work though. I am
Is anyone else having problems with Theo's handlespam.pl script after
upgrading to 3.0?
When I run the script, it hangs. If I go to a different machine, which
I have yet to upgrade from 2.64, the script runs with no problems.
Any ideas?
Quoting scohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When I run spamassassin -D --lint I am noticing this message:
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 0
Argument isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 572.
Spamassasin
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:58:19PM -0500, sargon wrote:
Is anyone else having problems with Theo's handlespam.pl script after
upgrading to 3.0?
Any ideas?
Sure. The currently published handlespam script doesn't support 3.0. It
still tries to use NoMailAudit and such, which is a 2.x API.
At 03:57 PM 9/27/2004, scohen wrote:
When I run spamassassin -D --lint I am noticing this message:
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 0
Argument isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 572.
Spamassasin
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
At 12:59 PM Monday, 9/27/2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=
Hi!
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
The question is always, did you block any legit mail...
Since this server supplies email for a limited number of users, we made
Just wanted to pass along a note of congratulations for the release of
version 3.0.0. My upgrade went quickly and turned out to be
bloodless. The documentation is easy to follow and just explicit enough.
Thanks again for a professionally developed and packaged project!
The best part of all is
At 01:30 PM 9/27/2004, Robert Leonard wrote:
I got the following in my headers.. I'm not sure how this could possibly
score so low, with all the hits it received...
A large number of hits doesn't imply it must have a high score.. Lots of
those rules have much less than 0.1 points..
and what's
32 matches
Mail list logo
