On Sunday, April 3, 2005, 10:34:12 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
2. Any idea how do I go about changing RDJ and bigevil.cf over to use
ws.surbl.org?
Yes, please use ws.surbl.org instead:
http://www.surbl.org/quickstart.html
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
I'd like to use razor-check as well on my servers, is it possible to have a
server on one of my own boxes or am I forced to use public servers? Haven't
found any docs around this.
I know it's possible with pyzor but how is it with syncing data?
Guides/howtos around this?
OK, probably a long message. Here's a summary:
I have PostFix + MySQL + Amavisd-New + ClamAV +Dovecot + (SquirrelMail and
IMP) + PostFix.Admin all working together well using virtual domains stored
in MySQL.
I can't find a good clear HOWTO for getting SpamAssassin plugged into the
mix to allow
thank God all of this you mentioned can be built up in modules.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL
this is for sa with mysql. built it accordingly; very nice.
Enables you doing per user/per domain/global settings. I guess it's
what u're looking for.
With a bit of shell/perl scripting
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 06:54 -0500, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
...
Can someone point me to a definitive guide? Should I try to locate a
local copy of the O'Reilly SA book to buy (I'm sort of in a backwater area
- buying a copy without using mail order might take a 4 hour round trip
drive).
Hi,
spamassassin with SQL support don't work with amavisd_new.
Use spamc and spamd for spamassassin with SQL support.
Bye,
Ingo
- Original Message -
From: Gerald V. Livingston II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:54 PM
Subject: Looking for
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
Hi,
spamassassin with SQL support don't work with amavisd_new.
You are mistaken. I am using SA 3.0.2 and amavisd-new with MySQL for
Bayes and AWL with no problems.
Use spamc and spamd for spamassassin with SQL support.
Bye,
Ingo
At 05:47 AM 4/4/2005, Johan Segernäs wrote:
I'd like to use razor-check as well on my servers, is it possible to have a
server on one of my own boxes or am I forced to use public servers? Haven't
found any docs around this.
There's no way to do that with the free Razor client.
I'm fairly sure that
If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing multiple times and
expecting a different result, what is it when you're doing the same thing
multiple times, expecting the same result, and you get DIFFERENT results?
That's what seems to be happening to me. I've been trying to search the
At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the reply, guess I missed that. I do have 2 questions though.
Sorry, I don`t know. What say Matt Kettler? ;)
Hmmm, someone mentioned my name and has summoned me to this thread... hmmm..
1. Any idea why the rulesemporium rules page
On 2005-04-04 09:32 -0400 or thereabouts, Matt Kettler wrote:
There's no way to do that with the free Razor client.
Just read some service info and license and it looks like I have to choose
something else.
A good howto on running my own pyzor server would be nice though.
Hi
guys,
We have some email addresses classified as all_spam_to
at Spam Assassinin our system.
The problem is
: If a message is sent to any user and the spammer puts a address of all_spam_to
at CCfor examplein the message, the message will be sent to the
users, even if its "High Scored"
Does anyone have a rule that will catch zero or a one being used as an O or a L
in the middle of a word?
Thanks
Bryan
-
This email transmission and any documents, files or previous
email messages attached to it may contain information that is
Don, some thoughts inline..
Don Levey wrote:
If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing multiple times and
expecting a different result, what is it when you're doing the same thing
multiple times, expecting the same result, and you get DIFFERENT results?
Sounds like the definition of
Jeff Chan wrote:
Perhaps DCC took these out. Please ask Pyzor to do the same.
DCC doesn't do removal.. Theoretically, it's correct for DCC to list
this newsletter.
DCC is technically a measure of bulk not spam. However, in the past
most users of DCC reported mostly spam, making it's
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:40 AM
To: Jim Knuth; Pete Geenhuizen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RulesDuJour error updating bigevil.cf
At 02:13 PM 4/3/2005, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thanks
Sure, but it's probably prone to FP's... use at your own risk.
body PT_01/[a-z][01\|][a-z]/
This also catches the vertical bar which is used as a substitute for lowercase
'l'. I use it as part of a META rule; by itself I would give it a very low
score.
Pierre Thomson
BIC
Chris Santerre wrote:
I'm not involved in RDJ or bigevil, and I'm only very
slightly involved in
SARE, so I can't comment here.
Slightly? You seem to forget how good your KungFu is ;)
No, I remember how good my KungFu is.. I just know I rarely have time to
use it for the benefit of
Daniel A. de Araujo wrote:
Hi guys,
We have some email addresses classified as all_spam_to at Spam
Assassin in our system.
The problem is : If a message is sent to any user and the spammer puts
a address of all_spam_to at CC for example in the message, the message
will be sent to the
Craig McLean wrote:
* The spamd/spamass-milter processes should not run as root (user
'spamassassin').
I gather from your previous mail that you already run this as
spamassassin. Make sure it owns the bayes files defined by
bayes_path. I created a subdirectory owned by the user and
On Apr 4, 2005 8:41 AM, Johan Segernäs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-04-04 09:32 -0400 or thereabouts, Matt Kettler wrote:
There's no way to do that with the free Razor client.
Just read some service info and license and it looks like I have to choose
something else.
A good howto on
...
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:08:49 -0400
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
To: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED], users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: EFF Newsletter as SPAM
...
Jeff Chan wrote:
Perhaps DCC took these out. Please ask Pyzor to do the same.
American Equity
789 University Blvd
Miami, FL
--
Robert Brooks, Network Manager, Cable Wireless UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hyperlink-interactive.co.uk/
Tel: +44 (0)20 7339 8600 Fax: +44 (0)20 7339 8601
- Help Microsoft stamp out piracy. Give Linux to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Levey wrote:
| Craig McLean wrote:
|
|
| * The spamd/spamass-milter processes should not run as root (user
|'spamassassin').
|
|I gather from your previous mail that you already run this as
|spamassassin. Make sure it owns the bayes files
Hi Everyone!
I know that Bayes is the defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but
I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and
what their experience with it is?
I run SA with Bayes enabled right now site-wide for more than 500 e-mail
accounts, and my problem is that
Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Hi Everyone!
I know that Bayes is the defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but
I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and
what their experience with it is?
I run SA with Bayes enabled right now site-wide for more than 500 e-mail
accounts, and
I can't comment on the effectiveness of SA without Bayes, but I can
suggest a couple of things. First, try just lowering the scores
given
to Bayes a bit so that emails won't be marked as spam solely because
of
Bayes.Secondly, try using per-user Bayes instead of global. It
is
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Levey wrote:
[snip]
[Spamassassin rejecting mail above a certain score]
| Not only that, but it seems to be happening now! I vaguely remember
seeing
| which config file would control this, but re-Googling for it doesn't turn
| anything up now.
-Original Message-
From: Gustafson, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:29 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: SpamAssassin Without Bayes
Hi Everyone!
I know that Bayes is the defacto best way to fight SPAM
right now, but
I wonder if
Gustafson, Tim wrote:
The problem with per-user Bayes for me is that I am running SpamAssassin
with spamass-milter, and my users are not savvy enough to be able to
update their own Bayes databases. They don't use any shell accounts -
it's all POP3 and in some cases, after the e-mail passes
Craig McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Levey wrote:
[snip]
[Spamassassin rejecting mail above a certain score]
Not only that, but it seems to be happening now! I vaguely remember
seeing which config file would control this, but re-Googling for it
doesn't
I am a client who was able to configure my .procmailrc on a server to place
spam messages in a file in my $HOME area. Going through this file I noticed
a message that was not spam. I know I can whitelist this address, but what I
really need to do immediately is recover the entire message. In the
Hi folks:
Well, I thought I had everything working just wonderfully ... all that nasty
spam was being dropped into the bit
bucket as I wanted. However, now I don't seem to be passing things through
procmail such that they get dumped.
I am really puzzled -- I believe this may have started
Don Levey wrote:
Craig McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Levey wrote:
[snip]
[Spamassassin rejecting mail above a certain score]
Not only that, but it seems to be happening now! I vaguely remember
seeing which config file would control this, but re-Googling
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:45:59PM -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
I am a client who was able to configure my .procmailrc on a server to place
spam messages in a file in my $HOME area. Going through this file I noticed
a message that was not spam. I know I can whitelist this address, but what I
On 4/4/2005 12:28 PM, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
I know that Bayes is the defacto best way to fight SPAM right now, but
I wonder if anyone out there is running SA without Bayes turned on and
what their experience with it is?
I have it turned off and don't miss it. Tweaking your rules works just
From: Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a client who was able to configure my .procmailrc on a server to
place
spam messages in a file in my $HOME area. Going through this file I
noticed
a message that was not spam. I know I can whitelist this address, but what
I
really need to do
37 matches
Mail list logo
