Hello Keith,
Thanks! Did those off the top of my head, just before going to bed,
and thought I had forgotten something. I believe your additions are
correct, and probably better than what we're actually using.
Bob Menschel
Wednesday, June 15, 2005, 7:51:52 PM, you wrote:
KI Robert Menschel
Network Operations wrote:
List;
We are an isp that currently runs through either qmail-scanner or Plesk
spamassassin. 2.6x and i believe 3.x. We are having issues with spamd
getting into the 125+mb process size at 4 to 5 processes. We are running
from Fedora to FreeBSD 4.9+ and qmail is the
I just received some spam built like
Vspan style=display: none some words /spanIspan style=display: none
more text /spanI
Is there any way to detect these?
Wolfgang Hamann
Does anyone have information on the installation/upgrade of V3 of
Spamassassin, on a system already running V2? Should the new version
go on top of the older one, or as a separate product install? Any
issues one should be aware of?
I am installing on RedHat 6.2 and using a fairly recent
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
online.de writes
I just received some spam built like
Vspan style=display: none some words /spanIspan style=display: none
more text /spanI
Is there any way to detect these?
Working on the logic that display:none is highly unlikely to ever appear
in
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:42:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just received some spam built like
Vspan style=display: none some words /spanIspan style=display: none
more text /spanI
Is there any way to detect these?
If I run this through SA I get:
3.1 HTML_OBFUSCATE_40_50 BODY:
The industry that I work in is currently having its concept of risk assessment
thoroughly shaken. The sort of risks we deal with have three main, largely
independant factors. For years we've been assigning a value to each of these
factors, and then adding them up to come up with a figure
Hi all,
I discover a problem today with our webmail (Horde/IMP).
When i send a message using it, the message is tag as spam if i have a
dynamic ISP addess.
here is part of the message:
Received: from 127.0.0.1 by mx (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED], uid
103) with qmail-scanner-1.24
(clamdscan:
From: Chris Hastie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The industry that I work in is currently having its concept of risk
assessment
thoroughly shaken. The sort of risks we deal with have three main, largely
independant factors. For years we've been assigning a value to each of
these
factors, and then adding
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I get this message on 2 servers, while all my other servers, with the
same config are ok.
debug: DNS: timeout for ahbl after 20 seconds
Any idea of what could be wrong?
Regards,
Ugo
Anyone?
In the process of setting up a new server,
so I thought I'd give SA 3.1 a try. Install went fine, but in looking
at my maillog, I'm seeing the following errors about every 5 minutes. Anyone
have an idea what the cause might be? Running FreeBSD 5.4, Sendmail
8.13.3, SA3.1 SVN snapshot from
At 03:44 PM 6/15/2005, Network Operations wrote:
We are an isp that currently runs through either qmail-scanner or Plesk
spamassassin. 2.6x and i believe 3.x. We are having issues with spamd
getting into the 125+mb process size at 4 to 5 processes. We are running
from Fedora to FreeBSD 4.9+
Dr Robert Young wrote on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:39:04 -0400:
Should the new version
go on top of the older one, or as a separate product install? Any
issues one should be aware of?
You can just upgrade. But read the upgrade instructions, several options
have been removed/added. Also, there
At 05:39 PM 6/15/2005, Dr Robert Young wrote:
Does anyone have information on the installation/upgrade of V3 of
Spamassassin, on a system already running V2? Should the new version go
on top of the older one, or as a separate product install?
Yep. Just install directly on top of the old
Dr Robert Young wrote:
Does anyone have information on the installation/upgrade of V3 of
Spamassassin, on a system already running V2? Should the new version
go on top of the older one, or as a separate product install? Any
issues one should be aware of?
I am installing on RedHat 6.2 and
I just received some spam built like
Vspan style=display: none some words /spanIspan style=display:
none more text /spanI
Is there any way to detect these?
Sure. rawbody or full rule.
Loren
On 6/16/2005 3:35 PM +0200, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
debug: DNS: timeout for ahbl after 20 seconds
Any idea of what could be wrong?
Regards,
Ugo
Anyone?
lookup something something manually on those two boxes:
host 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.ahbl.org
that should come back with:
- Original Message -
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: Bayes? (MORE)
John Fleming wrote on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:25:28 -0500:
Note that there -is- a BAYES_ entry! I have some modified Bayes
Niek wrote:
On 6/16/2005 3:35 PM +0200, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
debug: DNS: timeout for ahbl after 20 seconds
Any idea of what could be wrong?
Regards,
Ugo
Anyone?
lookup something something manually on those two boxes:
host 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.ahbl.org
that should come back with:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
From: Chris Hastie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thus if a piece of mail has failed all three of these tests, the
probability of
it being ham is 0.05 * 0.2 * 0.4 = 0.004, or 1/250. Or put another way, we
can
be 99.6% sure it is spam.
They got there
I have a particular address whitelisted via
spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It works for a while, but then comes back reported as spam after a week or
two.
I recieve mail from this user, tagged with AWL, as well as BAYES40. However
there are a couple of spammy rules fired that seem to
Andy, can you open a bug at bugzilla, run with debugs on for a while and
collect 1 or 2 of those cases, and attach the debug log to the bug?
sounds like it warrants checking out.
--j.
On Thursday 16 June 2005 01:42 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just received some spam built like
Vspan style=display: none some words /spanIspan style=display:
none more text /spanI Is there any way to detect these?
Here's what I use:
rawbody SENET_DISPNONE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/16/2005 02:10:27 PM:
Andy, can you open a bug at bugzilla, run with debugs on for a while
and
collect 1 or 2 of those cases, and attach the debug log to the bug?
sounds like it warrants checking out.
--j.
Done. Bug 4407.
Andy
Chris Hastie wrote:
The industry that I work in is currently having its concept of risk assessment
thoroughly shaken. The sort of risks we deal with have three main, largely
independant factors. For years we've been assigning a value to each of these
factors, and then adding them up to come up
John Fleming wrote on Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:08:22 -0500:
I'm not sure I fully understand why the single digit entries allowed BAYES_
score headers on spam but not ham, but I'm happy to use the multiple scores
and have all of my BAYES_ entries back.
Hm, just checked our setup and we changed
I'm trying to update my ldap plugin to use SRV lookups for server
discovery but am getting barked at during tests with the Insecure
dependency in connect... error. I'm not having much luck with googling
this error, but I remember this was a problem with razor and spamassassin
before, and I'm
On 6/15/2005 3:20 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Eric -- you may have to patch the AutoWhitelist class to throw those
numbers into variables hanging off the PerMsgStatus object. Then the
plugin can access those values safely.
I'd be +1 on applying a patch that simply sets a variable or two on
Richard Ozer wrote:
I have a particular address whitelisted via
spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It works for a while, but then comes back reported as spam after a
week or two.
This is normal due to the way the AWL works.
I recieve mail from this user, tagged with AWL, as well as BAYES40.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric A. Hall writes:
On 6/15/2005 3:20 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Eric -- you may have to patch the AutoWhitelist class to throw those
numbers into variables hanging off the PerMsgStatus object. Then the
plugin can access those values safely.
Pardon me - I misread your memo. They use adding rather than multiplying.
Adding is more appropriate for scores related to spam than to ham. (The
proper would be to somehow invert the probability of being spam score,
multiply them together, and then reinvert to get a spaminess score. The
additions
jj-ml wrote:
Hi all,
I discover a problem today with our webmail (Horde/IMP).
When i send a message using it, the message is tag as spam if i have a
dynamic ISP addess.
here is part of the message:
Are these the (only) received headers that were given to SpamAssassin?
Received: from
There is spamassassin -L, but not spamc -L. Why not? I want to use with
kmail, and spamc (with network check) is too slow on my home machine.
spamassassin -L is OK, but woundn't a spamc -L be faster since it avoids
startup cost?
Hi All,
Forgive me if this is a common question or one which has been answered
elsewhere, but I cannot find the answer anywhere.
I want to enable spamassassin on our production mail server, however I
only want to filter for spam on selected email accounts.
I was thinking of doing an all_spam_to
spamd -L
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: 2005 June, 16, Thursday 19:09
Subject: spamc -L ?
There is spamassassin -L, but not spamc -L. Why not? I want to use with
kmail, and spamc (with network check) is too slow
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:39:50AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi All,
Forgive me if this is a common question or one which has been answered
elsewhere, but I cannot find the answer anywhere.
I want to enable spamassassin on our production mail server, however I
only want to filter for spam
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 23:07 -0500, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:39:50AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi All,
Forgive me if this is a common question or one which has been answered
elsewhere, but I cannot find the answer anywhere.
I want to enable spamassassin on our
Matt Kettler wrote:
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
-rw-rw-rw-1 prganci users 165988 May 14 10:05 bayes_journal
-rw---1 pangione users 34 May 14 10:00 bayes.lock
That's a little troubling.. are you having problems with spamd instances
crashing? The lock is at least 5
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
I am running Spamassassin 3.0.2 on a RaQ 550 using spamd and calling
spamc from procmail. I have found several instances now where the
spamd child is respawned just as it is about to start processing a
message.
Can anybody give me even a wild guess on this one? Believe
39 matches
Mail list logo
