Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:28:29 -0400:
Which module are you talking about? I'm assuming the Mail::DomainKeys
module. If so, you need to install that from CPAN, it's not part of SA.
I'm adding that to the list of optional modules in the INSTALL doc.
On 21-Jun-2005 Michael Parker wrote:
> Christine Kuhlmey wrote:
>
>>I get errors in "make test" in the t/bayesdbm_flock routine.
>>I try to get spamassassin 3.0.4 running under Solaris 9
>>(each of the earlier versions I got running without test errors)
>>
>>
>>
> Odd, you aren't by chance runn
Hey Matt,
Thanks heaps for the update. That certainly really helps my mystery!
If this is the case, I will try to live with these facts! oh well *sob*
Christian.
Subject: Re: Exchange/Outlook - how do you learn spam?
Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:40:00PM -0500
Quoting Matt Yackley ([EMAIL PROT
Christian Purnomo said:
> I have a similiar approach, I noticed though that when the email is
> copied across to a public folder OR an IMAP folder, the email
> header/body is changed with ms-application/tnef. So whatever you feed
> sa-learn, it's not going to be effective as the body of the email
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:57:26AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why does the same e-mail, when processed on the same machine, through
> the same spamc, for differing users, have different values for
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 (1,5, 0.1), RAZOR2_CHECK (0.1, 1.5),
> PYZOR_CHECK (2.0, 3.5)? As fa
> pts rule name
> --
> 0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_72
> 0.1 HTML_30_40
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE
> 1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100
> pts rule name
> --
> 0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_72
> 0.0 HTML_30_40
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE
> 0.1 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100
> 3.5 BAYES_99
> Wh
I have a similiar approach, I noticed though that when the email is
copied across to a public folder OR an IMAP folder, the email
header/body is changed with ms-application/tnef. So whatever you feed
sa-learn, it's not going to be effective as the body of the email has
changed since from the origi
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>>
> > I don't believe anything was changed about this. The 3.1 code, for
instance,
> > still looks for 50 chars:
> >
> > while ( ($k,$v) = each %{$conf->{tests}} ) {
> > if ($conf->{lint_rules}) {
> > if (length($k) > 50 && $k !~ /^__/ && $k !~ /^T_/) {
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irina wrote:
I decided to downgrade it by downloading TAR. Installed
prerequisites and the module itself just fine.
Running spamassassin --lint and see the complaint about version of it
is not numeric (0.49_03), therefore it can not compare 2 versions
Argument "
> But 0.49_03 IS numeric. Perl allows embedded _'s in numeric literals.
>
> Even if you put it in quotes - "0.49_03" - it's STILL numeric.
>
> perl -e "print 1 if 1 < 1.2_3"
> 1
>
> perl -e "print 1 if 1 < '1.2_3'"
> 1
This seems to be a problem with some internal perl statement parser and the
wa
> but after few days, the
> efficency of SpamAssassin degrades from >90% of spam correctly
> identified to a 60%... I tried to learn it again with new, not
You must have something really wrong here. SA does degrade with time, but
it is over months, not days, and it is only around 10% degredation.
Hi,
I've recently been seeing some rather strange behaviour with Bayes and
AWLs. Basically, I have a SA 3.0.4 installation running through Spamd
on a server, to handle spam filtering. I find, though, that the same
message, presented to two different users running through the same spamc
for filte
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:19:16PM -0400, Jeff Koch wrote:
> On both 3.0.2 and 3.0.4 I'm getting the following error when trying to
> start spamd on a CentOS 3.4 mailserver (Redhat ES 3.4 clone).
>
> /etc/init.d/spamd has SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m5 -q -x -v -H" which works
> successfully with a num
Hello Mailing,
Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 10:48:44 AM, you wrote:
MLANC> Hi!
MLANC> I have a little problem with spam recognition. I have re-learned
MLANC> SpamAssassin (deleting old file from ".spamassassin" directory, to clear
MLANC> old information) and it worked really nice... but after few day
Hi:
On both 3.0.2 and 3.0.4 I'm getting the following error when trying to
start spamd on a CentOS 3.4 mailserver (Redhat ES 3.4 clone).
/etc/init.d/spamd has SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m5 -q -x -v -H" which works
successfully with a number of Redhat 8.0 mailservers.
I tried local.cf with 'use_a
Ben O'Hara wrote:
> On 6/21/05, E. Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jon Dossey wrote:
>>> My problem is I don't like my MX (sitting in DMZ's), to connect
>>> back to the Exchange server (private network) via IMAP.
>
> If your MX already connects back to the exchange server via smtp/25
> then wha
On 6/21/05, E. Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Dossey wrote:
> > (moved to bottom quote for you)
> >
> > I think I know the document you're referring to...
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RemoteImapFolder?highlight=%28imap%2
> > 9
> >
> > My problem is I don't like my MX (sitting in D
I have SA 3.0.2 set up with vpopmail, using MySQL for user preferences,
auto whitelisting and bayesian storage.
It seems that with auto_learn turned on, SA is keeping a per-user bayes DB
in MySQL, which is great. However, I can't figure out how I can teach SA
about spam/ham on a per-user basis
Hmmm, I wonder why it complained with 0.49_03 and was ok when I left 0.49
only.
Irina
===
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 5:22 PM
Subject: RE: Net::DNS problem?
Irina wrote:
> I decided to downgrade it by download
I have SA 3.0.2 set up with vpopmail, using MySQL for user preferences,
auto whitelisting and bayesian storage.
It seems that with auto_learn turned on, SA is keeping a per-user bayes
DB in MySQL, which is great. However, I can't figure out how I can teach
SA about spam/ham on a per-user basis
Irina wrote:
> I decided to downgrade it by downloading TAR. Installed
> prerequisites and the module itself just fine.
>
> Running spamassassin --lint and see the complaint about version of it
> is not numeric (0.49_03), therefore it can not compare 2 versions
> Argument "0.49_03" isn't nume
I decided to downgrade it by downloading TAR. Installed prerequisites and
the module itself just fine.
Running spamassassin --lint and see the complaint about version of it is not
numeric (0.49_03), therefore it can not compare 2 versions
Argument "0.49_03" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:50:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running SpamAssassin 3.0.4 on a SuSE Linux 8.2 box.
>
> Ever since I ugraded to SA 3.0.1 and in all subsequent revs, SA installs
> just fine, the spamassassin binary works perfectly, but spamc/spamd fail
> miserably.
>
> spa
All,
I also ran into this problem:
> 0.51 has already been released that addresses the overlooked debug
> statement (http://www.net-dns.org/).I still get failures in
> the "11-escapedchars.t" test under Solaris-8/Perl-5.8.6 though.
I contacted the author and he said it's fixed in SVN:
"I f
Jon Dossey wrote:
(moved to bottom quote for you)
I think I know the document you're referring to...
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RemoteImapFolder?highlight=%28imap%2
9
My problem is I don't like my MX (sitting in DMZ's), to connect back to
the Exchange server (private network) via IMAP.
> > Jon Dossey wrote:
> > > I'm sure a lot of us have a similar setup, linux/bsd mx gateways
> > > (running SA) relaying mail to Exchange, and Outlook clients. I'm
just
> > > curious how everyone handles learning?
> > >
> > > It seems like a lot of people recommend a public folder for users
to
> >
Some people use various IMAP clients to do it, but I use the Outlook
object model using Win32::OLE (probably because of my Windows
background) and a COM object created by Dmitry Streblechenko
(www.dimastr.com) called Outlook Redemption..
There's a charge for it's use with any commercial applicat
Jon Dossey writes:
>
> I'm sure a lot of us have a similar setup, linux/bsd mx gateways
> (running SA) relaying mail to Exchange, and Outlook clients. I'm just
> curious how everyone handles learning?
>
> It seems like a lot of people recommend a public folder for users to
> dump spam in, but
I use Thunderbird to download the messages from Exchange via IMAP. I create
local folders (making sure to set Thunderbird for MBOX format) and then copy
to the local folders, one for Spam and one for Ham. Then I go into the
profile, grab the mbox files, and upload to the server for import. This
Easiest way to get them out of the Exchange public folder without
messing up the headers is via IMAP. There are some scripts available to
open the folder and read the messages (can't recall exactly where, but
if you can't find them let me know and I'll pass mine onto you - they're
modified ver
I'm sure a lot of us have a similar setup, linux/bsd mx gateways
(running SA) relaying mail to Exchange, and Outlook clients. I'm just
curious how everyone handles learning?
It seems like a lot of people recommend a public folder for users to
dump spam in, but how do you get it back out into a
> Hello at SA list,
>
> I enabled SURBL in SA 3.0.2 from init.pre. Then checked
> on people's mailboxes for this string
> SURBL (I even checked for RBL string)
>
> But I don't see if any of RBL scores were assigned for 10
> minutes. Do you know what and how I can test. I tried to
> use the
I used atomicrocketturtle.com's project-gamera to isntall
SA/clam/qmail-scanner.
After getting it all setup, as you can see below, messages are being
tagged twice in the headers. I am running spamd in debug mode so I watch
messages go through, it doesn't SEEM like it's being scanned for spam
twic
Hello at SA list,
I enabled SURBL in SA 3.0.2 from init.pre. Then checked on people's
mailboxes for this string
SURBL (I even checked for RBL string)
But I don't see if any of RBL scores were assigned for 10 minutes. Do you
know what and how I can test. I tried to use the test from
http://
Hi!
I have a little problem with spam recognition. I have re-learned
SpamAssassin (deleting old file from ".spamassassin" directory, to clear
old information) and it worked really nice... but after few days, the
efficency of SpamAssassin degrades from >90% of spam correctly
identified to a 60%...
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:49:36AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> > warn "config: warning: rule name '$k' is over 50 chars\n";
>
> 3.1 no longer complains about descriptions over (what was it?) 70 chars --
> it does complain about overlong rule names, but descriptions have a much
> higher li
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:48:28AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> Descriptions being set for non-existent rules is a thoroughly minor
> issue and hardly has any effect, and scattering "ifplugin" lines
Well, yes, it's minor, but the message only occurs when running --lint.
This is something worth not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:09:24PM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Theo, I thought the warning on rule name length and description
> > length had either been eliminated to drastically lengthened for
> > non-English rules. Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:32:07PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > The interesting part concerning sa is that the warnings only appeared
> > *after* I commented out the hashcash plugin. Unexpected, isn't it?
>
> The problem
SSK1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/20/2005 08:31:01
PM:
> Our inbound/outbound SMTP mail is traversing via MessageLabs..
>
> Cut a long story stort - I want to bypass messagelabs (costs) and
> implement an (in-house) Antispam solution.
>
> (domain1.com) I have 12 (W2K/Linux) Domino Servers
I'm running Postfix:amavisd-new:ClamAV:SpamAssassin on Debian Sarge, as
a gateway for our Exchange server. Works like a charm.
Elliot
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 10:27 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spa
Christine Kuhlmey wrote:
>I get errors in "make test" in the t/bayesdbm_flock routine.
>I try to get spamassassin 3.0.4 running under Solaris 9
>(each of the earlier versions I got running without test errors)
>
>
>
Odd, you aren't by chance running on an NFS mounted directory are you?
Michael
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:32:07PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> The interesting part concerning sa is that the warnings only appeared
> *after* I commented out the hashcash plugin. Unexpected, isn't it?
The problem is that the translation files don't use the ifplugin bits to
correctly limit the d
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:09:24PM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Theo, I thought the warning on rule name length and description length had
> either been eliminated to drastically lengthened for non-English rules. Or
> was this only in the 3.1 stream? I know there was work done on this
> somewh
Steven Stern wrote:
On a brand new RHEL4 installation, I've having problems with Net::DNS:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug: Net::DNS version: 0.51
debug: trying (3) apache.org...
debug: looking up NS for 'apache.org'
debug: NS lookup of apache.org failed horribly => Perhaps yo
wrote on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:40:13 -0700:
> > Where's that warning coming from?
>
> Perhaps the ä?
Yes, thanks for the hint. I removed the file with the German descriptions
and all is well. Those custom-language environments are a real trap. I
prefer to have it all in en-us on my own server
Check out http://www.uribl.com/. Click on the "Usage" link on the left.
Cheers,
Phil
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron McKeating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2005 12:03
> To: SPAMASSASSIN
> Subject: uri
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:28:29 -0400:
> Which module are you talking about? I'm assuming the Mail::DomainKeys
> module. If so, you need to install that from CPAN, it's not part of SA.
> I'm adding that to the list of optional modules in the INSTALL doc.
Yes, Mail::DomainKe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I know emails from eBay with links and other emails with url links in
signature are hit with my custom rules...but as I said, one can lower the
scores all the way to 0.01 if needed. I also believe that ebay, paypal and
amazon are the top items for p
A little confused here, just got a spammy email for dodgy watches and
checked them on the surbl site, they were listed in black.uribl.com but
it only got a score of 1.3
Our scores for surbl stuff is
score URIBL_AB_SURBL 5.5
score URIBL_OB_SURBL 5.5
score URIBL_PH_SURBL 5.5
score URIBL_SBL 5.5
sco
Ronan wrote:
SA 3.1pre
spamassassin --lint -D
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: use_dcc 1
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: use_razor2 1
although use_pyzor 1 doesnt flag an error!??
DCC and Razor are disabled by default due to their license terms. Pyzor
is enabled b
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 16:55 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Ron McKeating wrote:
> > Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
> > report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
> > users?
>
> If it is exiscan
Jim Knuth wrote on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:05:10 +0200:
> sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is
> (see attachment warning.txt)
Got the same when I reviewed a 3.0.1 installation from rpm on CentOS with
German environment the other day. I simply removed the rpm installatio
Hi,
Recently I have received a couple of messages with empty bodies and
subjects. The messages generate 8.3 hits yet the subject is still not
rewritten, required hits is set to 6.0. I am running Spamassassin-3.0.3 with
qmail on SUSE Linux 9.1. Is this a known problem or a bug?
Mike Peters
Linux S
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:00:16 -0400
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 06:17:25PM +0200, Marco Herrn wrote:
> > udp 368 0 *:34602 *:*
> >10608/spamd child
> > udp 368 0 *:34603
Hi,
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco Herrn wrote:
> > What does that mean? All udp connections listen on the whole internet. Is
> > this a bug? Have I configured spamd incorrectly?
> >
>
> What plugins are you using? Any chance you've got a SA plugin that does it's
> own
> UDP
Hi,
I'm currently trying to move from a pair of machines running MD 2.43 & SA 2.64
to a pair of much faster systems running MD 2.52 & SA 3.0.4.
I'd like to use my existing bayes and awl DBs as these have been built up over
quite some time. I've tried using the db-to-txt.pl script to dump out th
SA 3.1pre
spamassassin --lint -D
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: use_dcc 1
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: use_razor2 1
although use_pyzor 1 doesnt flag an error!??
Hi,
I get errors in "make test" in the t/bayesdbm_flock routine.
I try to get spamassassin 3.0.4 running under Solaris 9
(each of the earlier versions I got running without test errors)
Any help is highly appreciated!
Thanks in advance
Christine Kuhlmey
these are the errors:
t/bayesdbm_floc
59 matches
Mail list logo
