This domain is not a dialup and is a static IP address, and completely
traceable to me. It has also never been involved in sending spam. If
the anti-spam community start misbehaving the future is indeed bleak.
==John ffitch
On Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2005 08:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This domain is not a dialup and is a static IP address, and
completely traceable to me. It has also never been involved in
sending spam. If the anti-spam community start misbehaving the
future is indeed bleak. ==John ffitch
Your
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2005 08:38 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This domain is not a dialup and is a static IP address, and
completely traceable to me. It has also never been involved in
sending spam. If the anti-spam community start misbehaving the
future is indeed bleak. ==John ffitch
if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
This domain is not a dialup and is a static IP address, and completely
traceable to me. It has also never been involved in sending spam. If
the anti-spam community start misbehaving the future is indeed bleak.
your mail goes through 217.155.197.248, which calls
Hello All,
Did some searching but couldn't really come up with much. Is there
anything that can be done to correct unparsable relays? I see then
in the SA header markup every once in a while. It is causing a small
issue with some Spam getting through.
If this has been covered
On Sunday 30 October 2005 05:37, Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2005 08:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This domain is not a dialup and is a static IP address, and
completely traceable to me. It has also never been involved in
sending spam. If the anti-spam community start
Somethings odd here. The above message, when it arrived here from the
list, did have a real name ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the headers, all
lines of it except those that refered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to the
intermediate handlers of the message. So it looks to me as if he is
doing it right.
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Michael Monnerie moaned:
On Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2005 08:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This domain is not a dialup and is a static IP address, and
completely traceable to me. It has also never been involved in
sending spam. If the anti-spam community start misbehaving the
Hi,
although most users have a real name in their email address, its absence alone
should not create
a high enough score for rejection. Indeed, the defaults seem to be low
score NO_REAL_NAME 0.124 0.178 0.336 0.007
I would like to see a test for low probability real names with a higher score
:)
Duane Hill a écrit :
Hello All,
Did some searching but couldn't really come up with much. Is there
anything that can be done to correct unparsable relays? I see then
in the SA header markup every once in a while. It is causing a small
issue with some Spam getting through.
If this has
At 08:26 AM 10/30/2005, you wrote:
A real name mean: The NAME of the Emailclient!
TheBat
Outlook Express
MS Outlook
Pegasus Mail
and so on
Umm.. No. No Real Name in the spamassassin rules means no real name
configured of the user, i.e.
Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wouldn't score, but
[EMAIL
A real name mean: The NAME of the Emailclient!
TheBat
Outlook Express
MS Outlook
Pegasus Mail
and so on
Nope, sorry. It has to do with the From address format:
My Real Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Real Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are
Hallo und Guten Tag Loren,
Heute (am 30.10.2005 - 17:36 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
A real name mean: The NAME of the Emailclient!
TheBat
Outlook Express
MS Outlook
Pegasus Mail
and so on
Nope, sorry. It has to do with the From address format:
My Real Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo und Guten Tag Loren,
Heute (am 30.10.2005 - 17:36 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
A real name mean: The NAME of the Emailclient!
TheBat
Outlook Express
MS Outlook
Pegasus Mail
and so on
Nope, sorry. It has to do with the From address format:
My Real Name [EMAIL
Here's an example:
=
Subject: Software
[snipped because otherwise this post is blocked! See below for spam details]
Here's what I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss writes:
Duane Hill a écrit :
Did some searching but couldn't really come up with much. Is there
anything that can be done to correct unparsable relays? I see then
in the SA header markup every once in a while. It is causing a
Hello Loren,
That's was exactly the problem.
Everything rocks great now
Thanks a lot
Mathieu Chateau
Saturday, October 29, 2005, 8:19:21 PM, you wrote:
Everything goes fine after spamd started. But after a while, spamd
processes takes the whole CPU until i kill them.
I removed all *.cf
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - here's what I want to do. I'd like to have more than one server
that is all feeding into the same database. And I want the databases set
up in a way that if the main server goes dow that the other servers run
locally. I don't need every update to have to make it to
Ajay Sharma wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - here's what I want to do. I'd like to have more than one server
that is all feeding into the same database. And I want the databases
set up in a way that if the main server goes dow that the other
servers run locally. I don't need every update to
On Sunday, October 30, 2005 at 4:33:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Duane Hill a écrit :
Hello All,
Did some searching but couldn't really come up with much. Is there
anything that can be done to correct unparsable relays? I see then
in the SA header markup every once in a
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Doc,
Sunday, October 30, 2005, 10:36:39 AM, you wrote:
DS Daniel,
DS I got a whole lot of these... if you could make that into a
DS 00_software_DW.cf file I can run it through the SARE masscheckers, if
DS you want.
If they're good enough, they can be added to
Ajay Sharma wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - here's what I want to do. I'd like to have more than one server
that is all feeding into the same database. And I want the databases
set up in a way that if the main server goes dow that the other
servers run locally. I don't need every update to
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Doc,
Sunday, October 30, 2005, 10:36:39 AM, you wrote:
DS Daniel,
DS I got a whole lot of these... if you could make that into a DS
00_software_DW.cf file I can run it through the SARE masscheckers, if
DS you want.
If they're good enough, they can be added
Ever since I upgraded to SA 3.10 I've been getting this error:
/var/dcc/map is not the size of a dcc map file
Anyone else seen this?
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
Hallo und Guten Abend Marc,
Heute (am 30.10.2005 - 23:01 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
Ever since I upgraded to SA 3.10 I've been getting this error:
/var/dcc/map is not the size of a dcc map file
Anyone else seen this?
upgrade dcc
/var/dcc/libexec/updatedcc
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Hi guys,
Wow this detail of feedback, recieved so fast, is great.
Evidently I didn't get it right the first time. Please bear with me -
this is my first rule attempt.
I've spent another hour or so and I think I have it right this time.
Please if you would try the attached cf file against your
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo und Guten Abend Marc,
Heute (am 30.10.2005 - 23:01 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
Ever since I upgraded to SA 3.10 I've been getting this error:
"/var/dcc/map is not the size of a dcc map file"
Anyone else seen this?
Duane Hill a écrit :
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro GROUP 4.2.8)
with GROUP id 166248333; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:56 +
GROUP is not a known method and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a known from. the
communigate guys should really put these between
Marc Perkel wrote:
Ajay Sharma wrote:
[snip], me talking about mysql's replication.
Thanks - I'll look ast it. Is it hard to set up? Does it require all
databases sysc or can you set them up individually?
Well, hard is a relative term. I didn't find it too difficult to
setup. And you
Hallo und Guten Morgen Marc,
Gestern (am 30.10.2005 - 23:41 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo und Guten Abend Marc,
Heute (am 30.10.2005 - 23:01 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
Ever since I upgraded to SA 3.10 I've been getting this error:
/var/dcc/map is not the size of a
On Sunday, October 30, 2005 at 11:31:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Duane Hill a écrit :
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro GROUP 4.2.8)
with GROUP id 166248333; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:56 +
GROUP is not a known method and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings, battlers.
I would like to rewrite headers on incoming spam without having SA
prepend X-Spam- to them. Two reasons:
First, I want to get rid of Disposition-Notification-To because many
of my users configure their Outlook to automatically honour delivery
notifications. That creates
On Sunday 30 October 2005 14:28, Marc Perkel wrote:
Ajay Sharma wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
[snip]
How does everyone else deal with this?
Have you looked into MySQL replication?
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/replication.html
I have a master/slave setup and the slave is
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Samstag, 29. Oktober 2005 06:33 Linda Walsh wrote:
Assuming it is some sort of berkeley db format, what is a good
cut-over size as a rule-of-thumb...or is there? What should I
expect in speeds for sa-learn or spamc? I.e. -- is there a
rough guideline for when
Randy Smith wrote:
On Sunday 30 October 2005 14:28, Marc Perkel wrote:
Ajay Sharma wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
[snip]
How does everyone else deal with this?
Have you looked into MySQL replication?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings, battlers.
I would like to rewrite headers on incoming spam without having SA
prepend X-Spam- to them. Two reasons:
I'm not sure what your set up is, but I use procmail and formail to
rewrite headers.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Marc,
Simple, create a MySQL cluster using two servers. I would recommend
using Linux HA with DRBD for the database. This is simple enough to
configure.
Then point all of your servers to that cluster. We have 4 SA daemon
servers pointed to one of these clusters. Unless you don't configure
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings, battlers.
I would like to rewrite headers on incoming spam without having SA
prepend X-Spam- to them. Two reasons:
First, I want to get rid of Disposition-Notification-To because many
of my users configure their Outlook to automatically honour delivery
38 matches
Mail list logo
