Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronan writes:
getting quite a few of the following in the logs which are letting
messages through unscanned.
running a dedicated server serving 3 mtas.
SA 3.1
MTA exim 4.54
Nov 3 03:05:44 dung spamd[11633]: spamd: bad
Dear List,
From time to time we have the problem that spamassasin is timingout.
This only happens when we recieve alot of mail at once.
Is there anything to do against it ?
I'm running Postfix+cyrus+spamassasin+clamv+amavisd
I hope someone can help me
Nov 8 10:18:43 mail.premiumxs.nl
I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through
recently.
Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything
beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam.
Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html table structure
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html table
structure that makes the contents of each cell print vertically.
For example:
table
tr
tda d g/td
tdb e h/td
tdc f i/td
td width=100%/td
\tr
/table
This results
Pierre Thomson wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html table
structure that makes the contents of each cell print vertically.
For example:
table
tr
tda d g/td
tdb e h/td
tdc f i/td
td width=100%/td
\tr
Hi
I would like to have SA generate German reports, not English reports.
Whatever I do either I'm getting no report (report template not found
- although in /etc/mail/spamassassin/10_misc.cf the report template is
defined with lang de report blablabla) or there's an English report
in the
Hi all,
i use Spamassassin with ProxSmtp and P3Scan. It works perfectly but i search
more information about the --auth-ident option. I'am not sure but i think it
won't work here since there is ProxSmtp and P3Scan, am i right?
No, i would like to change spamassassin options according to the
Philipp Snizek wrote:
Hi
I would like to have SA generate German reports, not English reports.
Whatever I do either I'm getting no report (report template not found
- although in /etc/mail/spamassassin/10_misc.cf the report template is
defined with lang de report blablabla) or there's
is there a parameter I have to use when starting spamd -du user
?
I've searched Dr Google, the SA docs as well as the SA FAQ.
There is no switch, you need to set the systems LANG
environment variable to change the language of the reports.
thanx a lot. That works now.
Philipp
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 community webapp. Our newest version adds broadcast
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 16:38, shenanigans wrote:
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more
aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.
Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web
Duncan Hill wrote:
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 16:38, shenanigans wrote:
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a
more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of
broadband.
I upgraded my net::dns the other day and restarted spamd
after adding some new rules today and Im getting this message in my logs.
Im guessing its a perl error?
Can't locate Mail/SPF/Query.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
../lib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:01PM -0500, Ryan O'Neil wrote:
I upgraded my net::dns the other day and restarted spamd after adding some
new rules today and I’m getting this message in my logs.
I’m guessing it’s a perl error?
It means you don't have Mail::SPF::Query installed. Disable the
What's the plugin for and how would I fix it?
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:18 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamd error
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:01PM -0500, Ryan O'Neil wrote:
I upgraded
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC
IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail coming from places I shouldn't be
http://www.qmailrocks.org/
-Original Message-
From: Robert Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:28 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Qmail question..
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy
so this is
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:21:57PM -0500, Ryan O'Neil wrote:
What's the plugin for and how would I fix it?
It'd be the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF plugin, you could comment
it out of the init.pre file and restart spamd.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I'm at the age where food has taken the
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC
IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail coming
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a
windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only
SPECIFIC
IP's.. I'm
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC
IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail coming from
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a
windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to
figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp
connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail
coming from
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a
windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only
SPECIFIC
IP's.. I'm
On Dienstag, 8. November 2005 03:50 email builder wrote:
From what I understand, MySQL cluster design is such that the data
nodes keep all the table data in memory, which would not be feasible
in a 160GB scenario...
No. Cluster means: Take two machines of same config, and mirror them.
It's
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a
windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only
SPECIFIC
IP's.. I'm
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a
windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is
how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only
At 09:39 AM 11/8/2005, you wrote:
Thank you for your opinion. Consider learning to spell.
There was, IMHO, nothing rude in Arvinn's post -
just a suggestion to look at another product.
Looking at Arvinn's name (Arvinn Løkkebakken),
and a quick glance at the domain name
Thanks for the tips! I had no intention of starting any type of debate..
Was simply looking for help. I'm a Microsoft guy who uses Linux as a tool,
a tool that frustrates me to no end, yet I won't stoop to calling it names
or comparing this vs. that.. Each has their place, and neither is
I'd also through www.linux-ha.org into the mix. We use that to manage
the cluster for the SA database and use DRBD for the filesystem. We
also use the same concept backend email stores as well.
It's more open source to complement this open source.
-Original Message-
From: Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
shenanigans wrote:
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a
more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power
Matt Kettler wrote:
shenanigans wrote:
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a
more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.
Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01
Hi,
What happened to Habeas support in SA?
More than a year ago there was a discussion about using habeas.
There were patchs in there site (gone/broken link) and it would be
incorporated into SA 3.0.x.
Now we have SA 3.1 and no sign of habeas support.
Is it gone for good?
Raul Dias
Evan Platt wrote:
At 09:39 AM 11/8/2005, you wrote:
Thank you for your opinion. Consider learning to spell.
There was, IMHO, nothing rude in Arvinn's post - just a suggestion to
look at another product.
Looking at Arvinn's name (Arvinn Løkkebakken), and a quick glance at the
domain name
...
I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through
recently.
Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything
beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam.
Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html table
Hi,
I recall that at some time I had to symlink some file to one with an @euro part
in the name - but I am not exactly sure in which context
Wolfgang Hamann
Hi
I would like to have SA generate German reports, not English reports.=20
Whatever I do either I'm getting no report (report
Raul Dias wrote:
Hi,
What happened to Habeas support in SA?
More than a year ago there was a discussion about using habeas.
There were patchs in there site (gone/broken link) and it would be
incorporated into SA 3.0.x.
Now we have SA 3.1 and no sign of habeas support.
Is it gone
...
Duncan Hill wrote:
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 16:38, shenanigans wrote:
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a
more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of
broadband.
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a
windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is
how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp
My bad. I grep the wrong dir.
Do I need to enable it?
It doesn't seem to be working here.
( and now that I said that I can't find a habeas message here to test
*grin*)
Raul Dias
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 13:28 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Raul Dias wrote:
Hi,
What happened to Habeas
DAve wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Robert Leonard wrote:
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a
windows guy
so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is
how to
get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only
SPECIFIC
Raul Dias wrote:
My bad. I grep the wrong dir.
Do I need to enable it?
It doesn't seem to be working here.
( and now that I said that I can't find a habeas message here to test
*grin*)
It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests
enabled...
For what
From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through
recently.
Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything
beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam.
Some of the
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Qmail is dead. Concider something that is still getting developed. My
preference is Postfix.
I have to make sure that qmail and qmail-ldap won't get mixed up at this
point.
Bye,
Aiko
--
Aiko Barz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 2005-11-08 14:04:27 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests
enabled...
Why?
Best
Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE)
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:45:26PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests
enabled...
Why?
Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE)
In the same way that sending mail to spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
has been
Ronan wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
These are totally new ;) If you can track down a message
that causes this, a bug report would be welcome.
- --j.
Are you looking for an example message or just headers or what?
If you let me know ill have a hoke around and get one for ya!
Whatever
Martin Schröder wrote:
On 2005-11-08 14:04:27 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests
enabled...
Why?
Best
Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE)
SA 3.1.0 does NOT use the plain habeas SWE anymore. Period.
SA has been
Matt Kettler wrote:
Martin Schröder wrote:
On 2005-11-08 14:04:27 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests
enabled...
Why?
Best
Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE)
SA 3.1.0 does NOT use the plain habeas SWE anymore.
Roomity.com - Spammer list.
No more mail from this site.
It takes a REALLY stupid spammer to try this sort of excrement.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: shenanigans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: 2005 November, 08, Tuesday 08:38
Subject: [OTAnn] Feedback
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 08:57 am, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through
recently.
Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything
beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam.
Some of
...
From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through
recently.
[snip - original table drug spam]
Has anyone else been having this problem? Any rules to catch medication
names in those types of tables?
They
On 2005-11-08 17:37:01 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Actually, more to the point.. Habeas doesn't use or support plain-SWE anymore.
Thanks. Habeas didn't bother to tell their customers.
Best
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
If anyone can formulate a regex to catch these letters in any order, while
avoiding a
repeating sequence like A A A A A , it would make this a safer rule.
SARE has quite a number of rules specifically to catch these table drug
spams.
Loren
In-memory storage:
All data stored in each data node is kept in memory on the node's
host computer. For each data node in the cluster, you must have
available an amount of RAM equal to the size of the database times
the number of replicas,
This refers to the first line: In-memory
Our production database for a large number of emails (but using site
wide) is about 40mb.
What is your bayes_expiry_max_db_size set to? Do you feel that it has been
enough to effectively capture your various user email habits?
__
Start your
I'm not sure if Loren's rules made it into any particular
ruleset or if Leo morph'd too often to bother; Maybe someone
They were in specific.cf as I recall. Yes, they were in there, and yes, Leo
tended to get around them every few days. A couple of them are still there
and still hit
Default.
Gart
-Original Message-
From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:58 PM
To: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?
Our production database for a large number of emails (but using
Sorry, only answered part of the question. My users are quite happy
with overall markup of the spam. We occasionally get a HAM marked as
SPAM. We have an odd client base though.
-Original Message-
From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:58 PM
email builder wrote:
In-memory storage:
All data stored in each data node is kept in memory on the node's
host computer. For each data node in the cluster, you must have
available an amount of RAM equal to the size of the database times
the number of replicas,
This refers to the first line:
59 matches
Mail list logo
