RE: a rule for just re:

2005-12-20 Thread Bowie Bailey
Brian S. Meehan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Somewhere I got a rule for emails with only Re: in the subject line. However, I received a valid email and it had a valid subject line with stuff in it but it got marked as meeting the below rule. header SPAM_RE_SUBJECT_RULE Subject =~ /Re:/i

RE: a rule for just re:

2005-12-20 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Bowie Bailey wrote: Brian S. Meehan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: header SPAM_RE_SUBJECT_RULE Subject =~ /Re:/i score SPAM_RE_SUBJECT_RULE 2.1 describe SPAM_RE_SUBJECT_RULE This looks for subject lines with only re: in it. header SPAM_RE_SUBJECT_RULE Subject =~

Testing meta rule

2005-12-20 Thread Casey King
Title: Testing meta rule I am requesting someone to please send me an email from the SA users list with a normal geocities conversation in the body of the message. I have created two rules, and I want to make sure all geocities emails are tagged as spam, while at the same time, allowing SA

Re: Testing meta rule

2005-12-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:00:18AM -0600, Casey King wrote: have created two rules, and I want to make sure all geocities emails are tagged as spam, while at the same time, allowing SA users messages to be allowed without spam tagging. Why not just whitelist, or even better skip processing

RE: Testing meta rule

2005-12-20 Thread Casey King
Because I was too narrow-minded to think about doing that...but thanks for info. I think that will be much better than the rule I created. -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 11:06 AM To: 'SpamAssassin Users' Subject: Re:

reduce required_score for recipient domain

2005-12-20 Thread Marcus Sobchak
Hi, how do I reduce the required_score from 5.0 to a lower value for a special domain? I'd like to set required_score to 4.3 for all incoming mails to mydomain.org. All other domains should require the standard score of 5.0. Thanks, Marcus

RE: reduce required_score for recipient domain

2005-12-20 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Marcus Sobchak wrote: how do I reduce the required_score from 5.0 to a lower value for a special domain? I'd like to set required_score to 4.3 for all incoming mails to mydomain.org. All other domains should require the standard score of 5.0. I suppose you could make a rule that matches

Re: Testing meta rule

2005-12-20 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 12:05, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:00:18AM -0600, Casey King wrote: have created two rules, and I want to make sure all geocities emails are tagged as spam, while at the same time, allowing SA users messages to be allowed without spam tagging.

sa-learn, is not working

2005-12-20 Thread otubo
when I type # sa-learn --spam --mbox /home/user/INBOX.Spam --showdots nothing happens. BUT, if I type: # sa-learn --spam --mbox /home/user/INBOX.Spam --showdots -D the last lines seems like this: debug: lock: 3997 trying to get lock on /root/.spamassassin/bayes with 0 retries debug: lock: 3997

Re: sa-learn, is not working

2005-12-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:30:31PM -0300, otubo wrote: # sa-learn --spam --mbox /home/user/INBOX.Spam --showdots -D the last lines seems like this: debug: lock: 3997 trying to get lock on /root/.spamassassin/bayes with 0 retries [...] debug: lock: 3997 trying to get lock on

Re: Webmail takes too long to send email

2005-12-20 Thread Stuart Johnston
If you don't want to scan messages from the webmail, add a line like this above your spam scanning code: accept hosts = 127.0.0.1:+relay_from_hosts If you do want to scan webmail messages but don't want to wait for the scanning to complete, you can configure you webmail to use sendmail

Re: Load ldap prefs

2005-12-20 Thread Philip S. Hempel
Paolo Cravero as2594 wrote: Philip S. Hempel wrote: Did you copy'n'paste this or retype? user_scores_dsn ldap://locahost/dc=qmailldap,dc=lh,dc=com?spamassassin?sub?uid=__USERNAME__ locaLhost, perhaps? Let us know... pc It was a copy from . The whole problem

Re: Postfix, ClamAV, and SA

2005-12-20 Thread Mark Martinec
From SickBoy, It is true, that amavisd-new preloads some of the SA code, but it is also true, that this invocation of SA is more like using the spamassasin commandline, meaning very,very resource-hungy. This is a gross misinformation. amavisd-new behaves pretty much as spamd does, the main

Anyone using MPP/Spamassassin with Stalker?

2005-12-20 Thread BG Mahesh
hi Is anyone using MPP [http://www.raeinternet.com/mpp/] with Spamassassin and stalker.com? It is working for me but too much spam is getting thru. If I use MailScanner a lot more spam is stopped. How to increase the number of rules in spamassassin automatically that will work with MPP? --

Re: Anyone using MPP/Spamassassin with Stalker?

2005-12-20 Thread OpenMacNews
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 hi bg, BG Mahesh wrote: hi Is anyone using MPP [http://www.raeinternet.com/mpp/] with Spamassassin and stalker.com? It is working for me but too much spam is getting thru. If I use MailScanner a lot more spam is stopped. How to

Re[2]: SA, perl 5.8.7 and rules

2005-12-20 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Chris, In addition, Monday, December 19, 2005, 3:20:50 PM, you wrote: C Kai Schaetzl wrote: Chris wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:37:05 -0600 (CST): What would cause SA (sa-spamd) to core (perl) when there are rules in mail/spamassassin (recently downloaded from rulesemporium)? If

Re[2]: a rule for just re:

2005-12-20 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Bowie, Tuesday, December 20, 2005, 7:22:39 AM, you wrote: BB Brian S. Meehan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Somewhere I got a rule for emails with only Re: in the subject line. However, I received a valid email and it had a valid subject line with stuff in it but it got marked as