Yousef Raffah wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been under a spam storm for the last two days and most of the
message I get are similar to the one below, message for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I really don't understand how come I'm receiving
such messages! Can someone help me prevent these messages?
you'll
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 11:35 +0100, mouss wrote:
Yousef Raffah wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been under a spam storm for the last two days and most of the
message I get are similar to the one below, message for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I really don't understand how come I'm receiving
such
Yousef Raffah wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 11:35 +0100, mouss wrote:
Yousef Raffah wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been under a spam storm for the last two days and most of the
message I get are similar to the one below, message for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I really don't understand how come I'm
I have three samples of what looks like the same adult spam. When I first
received it, it scored 0 points. Training on the first sample now scores
Bayes_99, but nothing else. Each sample adds itself to DCC, but subsequent
ones are not hitting DCC at all, until I train on those.
I can add
On 3/21/06, Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dell PowerEdge 2550, Dual P4 2.4 ghz, 2 gig ram, hardware raid5, 4x74
gig 10,000 rpm scsi III drives from Seagate. Hopefully I can get the
ram upgraded to 4 gig eventually.
I'm not using anything quite as powerful, but innodb has made a
On 3/23/06, Abel Jeffcoat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have gotten a couple of replies, (thank you) but I thought I could be
more clear.
I'm looking for a tool that will all users to adminstor their blacklist
and/or whitelist. I use Qmail and have mail delivered to a Spam folder.
I
You should take a look at http://www.mailzu.org/
Maybe that's what you want?
Alexander
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jason Frisvold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zaterdag 25 maart 2006 16:58
Aan: Abel Jeffcoat
CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: Webadmin tool for
I have three samples of what looks like the same adult spam. When I first
received it, it scored 0 points. Training on the first sample now scores
Bayes_99, but nothing else. Each sample adds itself to DCC, but subsequent
ones are not hitting DCC at all, until I train on those.
I can add
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I was looking at IP::Country and trying to figure out how it works
and how it's packaged...
Noticed that the code and data are both part of the same tarball or
RPM... That's unfortunate. I suspect the data changes more often
than the code. In fact, it would be
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I was looking at IP::Country and trying to figure out how it works
and how it's packaged...
Noticed that the code and data are both part of the same tarball or
RPM... That's unfortunate. I suspect the data changes more often
than the code. In
Matt Kettler wrote:
It would be viable, but in my experience completely unnecessary. I have VERY
good results with this system and very few misses or miscategorizations.
I'm seeing a higher rate of connections from sites that aren't
in that database.
-Philip
After a number of these, it dies with:
bayes: encountered too many errors (20) while parsing seen lines,
reverting to empty database and exiting
ERROR: Bayes restore returned an error, please re-run with -D for more
information
.. which makes me sad. So, my question - is there a
martin wrote:
Craig Morrison craigsa at 2cah.com writes:
JamesDR wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Does anybody know the instructions for training SA with the contents
of the Thunderbird Junk folder ?
Upload them as single messages to your ISP account. If you have a
special folder in TB
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
given what you posted, you sa seems to be ok. you now need to make sure
your sendmail is actually calling procmail. try putting an error in your
procmail and see if that shouts.
I'm sorry, I really don't understand what you mean.
How do I put an error in
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
It would be viable, but in my experience completely unnecessary. I have VERY
good results with this system and very few misses or miscategorizations.
I'm seeing a higher rate of connections from sites that aren't
in that database.
- these
mouss wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
It would be viable, but in my experience completely unnecessary. I
have VERY
good results with this system and very few misses or miscategorizations.
I'm seeing a higher rate of connections from sites that aren't
in that
Matt Kettler wrote:
mouss wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
It would be viable, but in my experience completely unnecessary. I
have VERY
good results with this system and very few misses or miscategorizations.
I'm seeing a higher rate of connections from sites that
17 matches
Mail list logo
