Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to my
next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it
Good point, you're completely right! Thanks for pointing that out... :)
Cheers,
Jeremy
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 25, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Jeremy Fairbrass wrote:
/style=[^]+color:blue/
span style=color:blue; font-size:small;
Probably would also like this output, i think:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -D --lint 21 | grep -i razor
[4398] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent, version 2.75
[4398] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_razor2.cf
[4398] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path:
Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with
On Monday, April 24, 2006, 5:42:16 AM, Craig McLean wrote:
Smells like 419 to me, given (among other things) the level of literacy
displayed. If you have no objections I'll drop the sender a line and
see what the scam is...
Or better, ask savethechildren.org to comment:
[DOMAIN whois
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find the
file that contain the scores i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
variant)
0.8 BR_REMOVER_QUOTE BODY: Inclui
Pablo Allietti wrote:
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
variant)
0.8
Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with
Hello List,
It's me again with another doubt =P I'm stuck in this Domain Keys thing
because I don't know how to create a public and a private key for my
server. I already read the http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys to
understand how Domain Keys work but I can't go on with only this
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
Hello List,
It's me again with another doubt =P I'm stuck in this Domain Keys thing
because I don't know how to create a public and a private key for my
server. I already read the http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys to
understand how Domain Keys work but I
I want to run just the bayes test on several files and get bayes scores
I tried writing my own script using Mail::SpamAssassin but thats seems
to not give any score at all.
Is there any ready script available
Or can I get any pointers
Thanks
Ram
Unfortunately this is what I may be forced to do. I hate to let one
item give a high score, but when the message is nothing but an
IMAGE... no HTML... no link... and the blacklists have not yet picked
it up.. and Pyzor doesn't see it yet... what else can you do?
On 4/22/06, John D. Hardin [EMAIL
Pablo Allietti wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:20:22AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
The file that has scores for the default rules is
/usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf.
However, you do not want to make changes to that file, because they
will be overwritten every time you upgrade.
Title: Message
I got this email
with a high score of 101.6 and the version as 3.0.2. I have my score limit
set to 3.5 in my local.cf file. Why wasn't this detected as
spam?
Also when I run
spamassassin -v on my server I get the version as 3.1.1 but the email header has
3.0.2 as the version?
Title: Message
I got this email
with a high score of 101.6 and the version as 3.0.2. I have my score limit
set to 3.5 in my local.cf file. Why wasn't this detected as
spam?
Also when I run
spamassassin -v on my server I get the version as 3.1.1 but the email header has
3.0.2 as the version?
I got this email with a high score of 101.6 and the version as 3.0.2. I
have my score limit set to 3.5 in my local.cf file. Why wasn't this
detected as spam?
HEADER OF PROBLEM EMAIL:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.6 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,FM_NO_STYLE,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:20:22AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Pablo Allietti wrote:
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNS
DOH! Thanks Dale for pointing that out. Of course I didn't see the
negative sign.
Tracey Gates
Lead Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1350 South Boulder, Third Floor / Tulsa, OK 74119-3203
Phone 918-663-0991 / Fax 918-663-0840
This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above;
Pablo Allietti wrote:
ok and i need to restart spamass after modify the local.cf?
Yes.
--
Bowie
OK. Now I understand the high (actually negative) score but what about
the version difference? Anyone have any idea about that issue?
Tracey Gates
Lead Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1350 South Boulder, Third Floor / Tulsa, OK 74119-3203
Phone 918-663-0991 / Fax 918-663-0840
This communication
From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
(Someone remind me why the spamd option to disable the auto-whitelist
was dropped? I could instead chmod 0 the auto-whitelist file, I
suppose, but then the maillog is cluttered with extra warning output,
and it's still not scalable.)
It
Tracey Gates wrote:
OK. Now I understand the high (actually negative) score but what about
the version difference? Anyone have any idea about that issue?
Possible double-install. One in /usr/ and one in /usr/local?
On 4/26/06, Rosenbaum, Larry M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
(Someone remind me why the spamd option to disable the auto-whitelist
was dropped?)
It hasn't been dropped; they just moved the documentation into
Plugin/AWL.pm.
Ah, right, duh.
On Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 16:09 Pablo Allietti wrote:
i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
give 3.0
Don't do that, it's not required for a mail server to have an RDNS. At
least, it used to be the last time I looked into the RFCs.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc-
We are getting a lot of spam where the sender domain name changes, but the
sender always starts with a specific string.
We've only done a little bit of custom rule writing. How do we do a rule to get
the sender starting with a specific string?
Thanks, Al
We are getting a lot of spam where the sender domain name changes, but the
sender always starts with a specific string.
We've only done a little bit of custom rule writing. How do we do a rule
to get
the sender starting with a specific string?
You could probably just do something like this:
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:51 PM
Unfortunately this is what I may be forced to do. I hate to
let one item give a high score, but when the message is
nothing but an IMAGE... no HTML... no link... and the
blacklists
Al Danks wrote:
We are getting a lot of spam where the sender domain name changes, but the
sender always starts with a specific string.
We've only done a little bit of custom rule writing. How do we do a rule to
get
the sender starting with a specific string?
Try a rule something like
Gaute Lund wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:51 PM
Unfortunately this is what I may be forced to do. I hate to
let one item give a high score, but when the message is
nothing but an IMAGE... no HTML... no link... and
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
We have received a large quantity of spam that is nothing but a large
image. Spamassassin is tagging it a little because it is an image,
and only an image, however I'm wondering how other people are
handeling this type of spam?I don't want to score
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
We have received a large quantity of spam that is nothing but a large
image. Spamassassin is tagging it a little because it is an image,
and only an image, however I'm wondering how other people are
handeling this type of spam?
Al Danks wrote:
Matt Kettler mkettler at evi-inc.com writes:
Try a rule something like this:
L_FROM_STRING header From =~ /$string/
It appears that the rule is also hitting senders with the string following a .
I.e. From =~ /$com/ hits
comalksdfl.net
aksafjdla.com
From: Pablo Allietti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find the
file that contain the scores i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
variant)
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pablo Allietti wrote:
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse
I am using Freebsd 5.4 with Mailscanner-4.52.2-1. I have always encountered
this when bayes approaches nspam of arounf 2500. It just locks.
I have had this problem on numerous occassions. My bayes database will not
learn anymore than 2165 nspam. It seems to be stuck there. My tokens increase,
Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with the
36 matches
Mail list logo
