...
On Thursday 25 May 2006 21:31, Kai Schaetzl took the opportunity to write:
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote on Thu, 25 May 2006 17:12:07 +0100:
.de does not have a working WHOIS server, that's fundamentally broken:
No, *your* whois client is outdated and broken.
snip
And this is not the
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list,
so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming
at this with.
I think we can help you, but it will depend on exactly what you want to do.
SA normally is used to filter to mail for
Philip Prindeville writes:
Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list,
so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming
at this with.
it's definitely something that has to be dealt with on the MDF end;
SpamAssassin does allow it fine, but the caller has to implement
jdow writes:
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 is now available! This is a maintainance
release of the 3.1.x branch.
Whine, you mean I have to put in the special print code that Loren
needs for properly creating rules in yet ANOTHER release?
bug #?
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was just looking through the default scores and I noticed that
ALL_TRUSTED is only scored at -1.8. I thought it had a much lower
score than that. Am I completely off track, or did something change
in one of the recent versions?
It got hacked back because trust-path
Sur 2006-05-25, Evan Platt skribis:
Umm... Switch to a different mail provider?
I just blogged about this yesterday. If your university uses
IMAP, which is the case for almost all universities these days,
they can set things up so that each user has the option to have
his/her spammy
List Mail User wrote on Thu, 25 May 2006 23:02:21 -0700 (PDT):
DeNIC does not follow this protocol;
1. there's nothing which backs your claim, *nothing*.
2. example is an example and nothing else. You should know that. There are
also special
words in RFCs which clearly define mandatory
On Friday 26 May 2006 15:53, List Mail User took the opportunity to write:
Kai,
There doesn't seem to be any language barrier, so either you refuse
to read and follow the RFC trail yourself, or you require spoon-feeding.
What about RFC1032, page 5
VERIFICATION OF DATA
mark --
it's not too pretty.
header TWO_SUBJSALL =~ /(?:^|\n)Subject:.*\nSubject:/s
--j.
Mark Martinec writes:
Is it possible to add some score points to mail which has multiple
Subject header fields and/or multiple From header fields?
I guess not, but it is worth asking
List Mail User wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 06:53:36 -0700 (PDT):
What about RFC1032, page 5
RFC 1032 is not authoritative in any way. It never was a standard, it doesn't
define anything about the whois protocol. If you think so it's wishful thinking.
This RFC is not obsolete, and make quite
Craig Emmitt wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:01:53 -0500:
3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is classified
as spam (spamassassin.bat -e mailfilein mailfileout) Known
issue/bug?
There is something about exit codes in the changelog.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Paul Matthews wrote:
... what I want it to do is once it is marked as spam to move the e-mail
from /var/spool/mail/user to $HOME/mail/Junk
and same as marking it ham, move it from $HOME/mail/Junk to
/var/spool/mail/user
Can anyone tell me how-to do that?
Well, the desire to do this is
Hi,
i use SpamAssassin with MailScanner and Postfix and was wondering how I get
newly spam entered to the bayes database. I have created a little script
that polls our accounts :-
#!/bin/bash
LOCK_FILE=/var/lock/subsys/spam_check.lock
if [ -f ${LOCK_FILE} ]; then
logger -p
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was just looking through the default scores and I noticed that
ALL_TRUSTED is only scored at -1.8. I thought it had a much lower
score than that. Am I completely off track, or did something
change in one of the recent
3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is
classified
as spam (spamassassin.bat -e mailfilein mailfileout) Known
issue/bug?
There is something about exit codes in the changelog.
I had checked the changelog and didn't see anything obviously relevant.
Craig
Loren Wilton wrote:
Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list,
so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming
at this with.
I think we can help you, but it will depend on exactly what you want to do.
SA normally is used to filter to mail for recipients. You
Is it possible to add some score points to mail which has multiple
Subject header fields and/or multiple From header fields?
Sure. Ugly, but certainly possible. Something like
header DOUBLE_SUBJECT ALL =~ /\nSubject: *\nSubject:.\s+\S/m
Loren
header TWO_SUBJS ALL =~ /(?:^|\n)Subject:.*\nSubject:/s
header DOUBLE_SUBJECT ALL =~ /\nSubject: *\nSubject:.\s+\S/m
So this is what it boils down to, tested:
header L_DOUBLE_SUBJECT ALL =~ /^Subject:.*^Subject:/smi
score L_DOUBLE_SUBJECT 0.9
header L_DOUBLE_FROMALL =~
On May 26, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Loren Wilton wrote:
Is it possible to add some score points to mail which has multiple
Subject header fields and/or multiple From header fields?
Sure. Ugly, but certainly possible. Something like
header DOUBLE_SUBJECT ALL =~ /\nSubject: *\nSubject:.\s+\S/m
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:26:33 -0600:
No, it's to a list. At the list exploder, we want to be able to apply
certain per-list policies. For instance, for most lists (but not all),
the following would be applicable:
I don't use MimeDefang, but I guess it should be
Craig Emmitt wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 12:02:57 -0500:
I had checked the changelog and didn't see anything obviously relevant.
I mean this:
- bug 3754: if there's a problem opening a file via sa-learn or
spamassassin, return an error exit value.
It indicates there might have been changes
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 00:52:39 +0100:
After some research, I came to the conclusion that .de is, indeed,
still broken:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3912.txt
And *where exactly* does this
Is this a valid Message ID?
?7[14
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:26:33 -0600:
No, it's to a list. At the list exploder, we want to be able to apply
certain per-list policies. For instance, for most lists (but not all),
the following would be applicable:
I don't use MimeDefang,
I'm not sure what's the problem why I can't send mail with spam header.
Below are my master.cf and local.cf file, there maybe a misconfiguration?
master.cf:
# ==
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are fired... And you might have a specific set of rules for a list like
alsa-devel (the 'L' in ALSA is for Linux, so it might be reasonable
to assume that no one will be posting with charset='windows-1252'...
it's also an English language list, so
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 00:52:39 +0100:
After some research, I came to the conclusion that .de is, indeed,
still broken:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3912.txt
And *where exactly* does this RFC say that the whois input and
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 13:32:10 -0600:
Except that developers aren't vetted in any particular way.
vetted?
The spammer
with time on his hands could subscribe himself... plus there's always the
chance of a legitimate user's machine becoming infected with an email
jdow wrote:
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are fired... And you might have a specific set of rules for a list
like
alsa-devel (the 'L' in ALSA is for Linux, so it might be reasonable
to assume that no one will be posting with charset='windows-1252'...
it's also an English
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 13:32:10 -0600:
Except that developers aren't vetted in any particular way.
vetted?
You can sign yourself up for most lists, if you have a valid address
and a web browser.
You have to try to get yourself
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are fired... And you might have a specific set of rules for a list
like
alsa-devel (the 'L' in ALSA is for Linux, so it might be reasonable
to assume that no one will be posting with
jdow wrote:
(Otherwise - what in hell are the STD-XXX documents?)
Good question... Medical test results for people who *ahem* perform in
a certain film genre?
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications www.speed.net
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I don't use MimeDefang, but I guess it should be possible to tell MD to use a
specific configuration file when calling SA (depends on how it calls SA).
Absolutely. Here's an example from our mimedefang-filter:
---8---
if ($is_result_query) {
debug_log(2,spam:
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Thu, 25 May 2006 20:42:47 -0400:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.2 is now available!
rpm built, installed, linted, checked, running fine it seems.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
I notice that CPAN has the version listed as 3.001002, I take it this is
actually 3.1.2?
--
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
17:29:03 up 12 days, 5:29, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.43, 0.24
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
pgpepAHrLMQnQ.pgp
- Original Message -
I notice that CPAN has the version listed as 3.001002, I
take it this is actually 3.1.2?
--
Yes, I just finished upgrading it myself using CPAN and it
is 3.1.2.
=
Kevin W. Gagel
Network Administrator
Information Technology Services
On Friday 26 May 2006 5:35 pm, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
- Original Message -
I notice that CPAN has the version listed as 3.001002, I
take it this is actually 3.1.2?
--
Yes, I just finished upgrading it myself using CPAN and it
is 3.1.2.
Thanks Kevin, appreciate it.
--
Chris
...
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 00:52:39 +0100:
After some research, I came to the conclusion that .de is, indeed,
still broken:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3912.txt
And *where exactly* does this RFC say that the whois
On Fri, 26 May 2006, wrote:
Is this a valid Message ID?
?7[14
No, see RFC-2822 section 3.6.4
It clearly says that a Message ID must be:
\s id-left @ id-right \s
where you can more-or-less call the left right parts: [\w\.-\?]{1,}
(using perl reg-ex syntax, this is a slight
39 matches
Mail list logo
