Although our SA setup works very well in general, one issue that has
come up a few times recently is airline E-tickets/reservations.
Travel stuff in general seems to be designed specifically to hit as many
spam rules as possible. *Everything* from Travelocity and Alaska Air get
around 20
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Given that airline messages are important, are related to meney, and
recipients dont want to get forged ones, it would be a great idea to
start a campaign with airlines / travel agents to use some sort of
proof of origin (spf, digital signature, whatnot)
Hi everybody, I hope
I am sending this to the right place :)
I have the following
problem after having run the new spamassassin 3.1.3 for several
days
The emails dont get
stamped correctly after being evaluated and this shows up in their
headers:
SA:0(?/?)
And these lines show
up
Hi Loren, everyone
Loren Wilton wrote:
bayes token 'visa' = 0.997839158297152
bayes token 'refund' = 0.997646909307943
bayes token 'drinks' = 0.997585038685398
bayes token 'NUMBER' = 0.990398319296953
bayes token 'nights' = 0.98853871069642
This suggests you are still on 2.6x. It is possible
--On Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:10 PM -0400 Dave Koontz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Unfortunately, in our environment, inline images do get extensive use
from our users (College Students, Faculty). Much of their email is for
entertainment value, and many email jokes make use of Inline images of a
Chase James wrote:
I'm using sa-exim to run checks against incoming mail at SMTP time. It seems
to be working great, except it won't run my custom rules in
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf.
Check to see if /etc/spamassassin is your site rules dir.. SA will
automatically hunt for several different
I have found the problem: Never underestimate the power of your own systems
to make you feel dumb!.
It seems that our SonicWall firewall, sometime recently, had decided that this
was a forbidden site, so the 403 error was due to my own firewall blocking
access.
Have since unblocked the site
Hi,
just wanted to let everyone know that I found a SPAMD option that cannot
be configured via commandline: server-scale-period
By looking at the documentation, this option sets how much time the
system will wait before determining whether a new child is spawned, the
current default is 2
Hi,
I get the following error when starting spamd:
error: Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Sys/Hostname/Long.pm line 91,
GEN11 line 222.
System:
Solaris 9/sparc
Perl 5.8.6
This does not affect general operation, but it is
List -
I did quite a bit of searching, but didn't find anything relevant.
Basically I have a user on a mailing list that is getting an email which
they do receive but it's marked as spam in the subject. I've placed the
sender in the manual whitelist (local.cf), but it doesn't work, it still
List -
I did quite a bit of searching, but didn't find anything relevant.
Basically I have a user on a mailing list that is getting an email which
they do receive but it's marked as spam in the subject. I've placed the
sender in the manual whitelist (local.cf), but it doesn't work, it still
Are you sure that the subject rewriting is occurring at your server?
I've seen similar problems when the sending mail server marked it as
spam on the way out. Your amavis hits clearly show a different score.
Rgds,
Magnus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 08:48, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Given that airline messages are important, are related to meney, and
recipients dont want to get forged ones, it would be a great idea to
start a campaign with airlines / travel agents to use
Hi,
I plan to keep all my white_list from addresses in a separate file
instead of local.cf. Can anyone please tell me how to use an include
file in local.cf?
With warm regards,
-Payal
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:51:15PM -0400, Payal Rathod wrote:
I plan to keep all my white_list from addresses in a separate file
instead of local.cf. Can anyone please tell me how to use an include
file in local.cf?
You could use an include, but just put the whitelist entries in another
From: Jorge Valdes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I get the following error when starting spamd:
error: Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Sys/Hostname/Long.pm line 91,
GEN11 line 222.
System:
Solaris 9/sparc
Perl 5.8.6
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:19 -0500, Larry Starr wrote:
I have found the problem: Never underestimate the power of your own systems
to make you feel dumb!.
It seems that our SonicWall firewall, sometime recently, had decided that
this
was a forbidden site, so the 403 error was due to my
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Jorge Valdes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I get the following error when starting spamd:
error: Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Sys/Hostname/Long.pm line 91,
GEN11 line 222.
System:
Solaris
I have 2 email addresses that I would like only local domains to be able to
send messages to. Is there a way to do this with SpamAssassin 3.1.1?
Regards, Jess Mooers
~~~
Landmann InterActive
1423 S. Park St., Madison, WI 53715
W 608-257-1558
Jess Mooers wrote:
I have 2 email addresses that I would like only local domains to be able to
send messages to. Is there a way to do this with SpamAssassin 3.1.1?
SA is really the wrong tool for this, you should look at setting up a
filter via your Mail Server...
Jay
begin:vcard
fn:Jay
Jay Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, June 28, 2006:
Jess Mooers wrote:
I have 2 email addresses that I would like only local domains to be able to
send messages to.
Is there a way to do this with SpamAssassin 3.1.1?
SA is really the wrong tool for this, you should look at
I don't administer the SonicWall personally, but it has a pro-active web
filter, using rules that nobody here completely comprehends, to block
categories of Web Content.
The category that this URL was hitting was Free Software Downloads.
We're a fairly small organization so it's easy for me
As i understand it, in trusted networks you want to have any ip or ip range
that you trust to be reporting correctly the details of the server from which
it received the email.
If this is the case, presumably it is good to have the main service provider
servers in this list.
So if i know that
yeah I saw that -- looks like hermes.apache.org -- one of the ASF's
massive dedicated servers -- displayed behaviour like a zombie to some CBL
tester somewhere ;) It also made it to the XBL.
It was quickly delisted though, as far as I can see -- although I'm on the
road so can't check.
--j.
Hi
All,
After 6 months or
more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam has been missed over the
last few weeks. Running SA with -D option shows nothing obvious in the
logs.
A small selection of misses is posted
here:
http://www.pacificwireless.com.au/spam/
Anybodygot any
ideas why
Title: Setting bayes directory on Windows
Is anyone running on Windows (server 2003) and been able to get bayes_path and auto_whitelist_path to work properly? I can't get either to do anything for me. I've tried short names, no spaces, etc. Nothing seems to work. If I'm logged on it uses the
Ben Wylie wrote:
As i understand it, in trusted networks you want to have any ip or ip range
that you trust to be reporting correctly the details of the server from which
it received the email.
If this is the case, presumably it is good to have the main service provider
servers in this
Leigh Sharpe wrote:
Hi All,
After 6 months or more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam
has been missed over the last few weeks. Running SA with -D option
shows nothing obvious in the logs.
A small selection of misses is posted here:
http://www.pacificwireless.com.au/spam/
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leigh Sharpe wrote:
Hi All,
After 6 months or more of perfect operation, I have had heaps of spam
has been missed over the last few weeks. Running SA with -D option
shows nothing obvious in the logs.
A small selection of misses is posted here:
Leigh you have a large boatload of spam trained as ham. Make sure your
users realize that GOOD messages train as ham and BAD messages train as
spam. It appears at least one person has been feeding them both to the
ham training.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Sharpe [EMAIL
This was my first suspicion. I turned off Bayes tests temporarily and it had
little effect.
I'm seriously considering resetting the bayes and starting again, but this time
I'll be making sure that it only gets fed by people who are actually competent
enough to put their spam in the spam
As i understand it, in trusted networks you want
to have any ip or ip range that you trust to be
reporting correctly the details of the server from
which it received the email.
Yes, however there's another stipulation.. By default,
if undeclared, internal_networks will copy the values
of
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Leigh Sharpe wrote:
I'm seriously considering resetting the bayes and starting again,
but this time I'll be making sure that it only gets fed by people
who are actually competent enough to put their spam in the spam
folder and ham in the ham folder, not the other way
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:55:07PM -0700, jdow wrote:
1) all of this spam is hitting BAYES_00.. you really should check your
bayes training and correct it.
THAT is a bad thing. Getting down to BAYES_00 for spam takes some
doing. At the very least a whole lot of spam got trained as ham.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:11:33PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
You could use an include, but just put the whitelist entries in
another file
named something.cf, and you're done. SpamAssassin reads all .cf files in
/etc/mail/spamassassin -- local.cf is just the common one that gets used.
-Original Message-
From: Payal Rathod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:34 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: whitelist include file
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:11:33PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
You could use an include, but just put
Marc Perkel wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm trying to use the spamc -d option and it doesn't seem to be
working. I have multiple hosts listed and it works fo the first host
bot not for the second.
spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,localhost
What am I doing wrong? Or is there a bug?
Am I
37 matches
Mail list logo
