http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/06/09/04/2215210.shtml
Tesseract, developed by HP labs, is touted as one of the most
accurate OCR programs available. Google cleaned it up and has
released it OS.
{^_^}
Hi,
report_safe 0 doesn't help.
I have also:
always_add_headers 1
spam_level_stars 1
always_add_report 1
Do you have any other idea?
Best regards,
e2rd
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, e2rd wrote:
I would like to add headers X-Spam-Status, X-Spam-Level, X-Spam-Flag to
every
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:18:55 -0700 (PDT), e2rd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
report_safe 0 doesn't help.
I have also:
always_add_headers 1
spam_level_stars 1
always_add_report 1
Do you have any other idea?
Best regards,
e2rd
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, e2rd wrote:
I would
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 00:18, e2rd wrote:
Hi,
report_safe 0 doesn't help.
I have also:
always_add_headers 1
spam_level_stars 1
always_add_report 1
Do you have any other idea?
My local.cf has the following :
report_safe 1
add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
add_header all Status
Hi
I just noticed an older ruleset which produces some warnings on --lint
-D which I'm not sure anymore where it's from or if it's already
incorporated or whatever...
It's called obfuscated.cf and starts with:
#
# Catch financial report advisorys.
#
body__FIDEW1/project/i
body
Hi list,
I have a question about SPF support.
On my server, SPF_HELO_* tests work properly while SPF_* checks are
never performed; why this?
How does spamassassin decide to perform one test or the other?
In 25_spf.cf I see:
tflags SPF_PASS net nice userconf
but I cant'understand
Hi
i am using spamassassin as mail-filter, it tags me about the 40-50% of the spam.
I've use sa-learn on spam and ham messages, (i've learned about 3000
spam messages)
I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is
recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=195752cid=16041870
Theo just mentioned this on the -devel list:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.devel/45374
Kenneth Porter wrote:
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=195752cid=16041870
Theo just mentioned this on the -devel list:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.devel/45374
I posted about this last week on the Devel-Spam and Maia-Users lists,
along with the
--On Friday, September 01, 2006 9:25 AM -0400 Gino Cerullo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And he's signed his work this time.
Hail 'The Fat Bastard Controller' :P Whooop!
I tried to post direct links to other hacked sites but didn't see it go to
the list. So here's the google term I used to find
-Original Message-
From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
Starting out with another clean database, further testing
shows that in fact
the message
Hi
i am using spamassassin as mail-filter, it tags me about the 40-50% of the
spam.
I've use sa-learn on spam and ham messages, (i've learned about 3000
spam messages)
I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is
recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores
-Original Message-
From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report
Starting out with another clean database, further testing
shows that in fact the message was
Sipos Gabor schrieb:
Hi
i am using spamassassin as mail-filter, it tags me about the 40-50% of the spam.
I've use sa-learn on spam and ham messages, (i've learned about 3000
^^
spam messages)
I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of
Hi
ihave problem with vpopmail and spamassassin everything works fine
email message delivered but user preferences not working
#tail -n20 /var/log/everything/current
Sep 5 13:04:25 [spamd] config: cannot write to
/.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such file or directory_
Sep 5
Marco Michelino wrote:
Hi list,
I have a question about SPF support.
On my server, SPF_HELO_* tests work properly while SPF_* checks are
never performed; why this?
Actually, if any SPF tests are run, they are ALL run.
My guess is you have a broken trust path, which is causing the normal
SPF
mikemacfr wrote:
OK, but isn't spamd the settings file for spamassassin?
How does spamassassin know how to work if spamd is not used when
amavis is doing the routing?
The way it works is that Amavis uses SpamAssassin routines to score
the mail and then uses its own settings to decide what to
Hi Miles,
I'm currently using the spamassassin version from sarge-backports. I
have not encountered any issues but I have also based my setup on this
excellent how-to: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/ the author
provides a very thorough explanation.
- Joe
-Original Message-
From:
# sa-learn -L --spam and spamassassin -L -r learn the same spam differently.
SA version 3.13, using db or sql database, doesn't seem to matter,
--sync or not --sync, doesn't matter.
Also, it doesn't matter if I run sa-learn --spam or spamassassin -r first.
Further, spamassassin -r and sa-learn
OK, after Googling around for a bit, I may have stumbled on something... specifically this trust path thing. I had my trusted_networks and internal_networks set as my SMTP's and MX's class C network. Because of that, is that causing SA to look at the relay beyond the trusted network as the agent
Starting out with another clean database, further testing
shows that in fact the message was learned when I ran
'spamassassin -r' (though bayes_toks remained at 12288
bytes), and the same message was learned again when I ran
'sa-learn --spam' (and the size once again grew to 24576 bytes).
Chris Santerre writes:
-Original Message- From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Monday, September 04, 2006 8:36 PM To: Loren Wilton Cc: SpamAssassin
Users List Subject: Re: Enumerating the robots?
Loren Wilton wrote:
It was mentioned that several people are getting
Title: RE: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.
So, here's your first (of 3) warning to disable RDJ for antidrug until
the move is completed. (If you have SA 3.0.0 or higher you
shouldn't be
using antidrug.cf anyway).
I still get hits to the original SARE website! This is like 2
Title: RE: Enumerating the robots?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:17 AM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; SpamAssassin Users List
Subject: Re: Enumerating the robots?
Chris Santerre
Title: Test: anyone else getting a deltahealthgroup bounce?
I'm getting a very weird bounce messege from the list.
Reporting-MTA: dns;dhgsrv26.DeltaHealthGroup.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;DHG
Arrival-Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:46:01 -0500
Final-Recipient:
Hallo und Guten Abend spamassassin-users,
I`ve installed SA 3.1.5 on Debian Woody (Perl v5.6.1)
and see the following error:
--snip
spamassassin --lint
[[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 588.
--snap
but
perl
* Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo und Guten Abend spamassassin-users,
I`ve installed SA 3.1.5 on Debian Woody (Perl v5.6.1)
and see the following error:
--snip
spamassassin --lint
[[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Matthias Haegele wrote:
I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is
recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores
You could adjust the score for HTML_MESSAGE (or adjust it for other
rules that hit your spam) ...
(afaik default is 0, in
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, nik600 wrote:
I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is
recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores
***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on unixmail.
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
The only /non-technical/ issue that occurs to me is in the
licensing, which is a combination of the Apache License (2.0) and
a custom clause that may be a non-starter for some applications:
If you wish to use it for commercial gain you must contact
Matt,
Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue
publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to wherever
eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional updates
foreseen it should probably be removed from RDJ altogether.
LMK.
Chris Thielen
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, nik600 wrote:
I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is
recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores
***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on unixmail.
mouss wrote:
(counter) examples are available on this list (see a message sent on
2006/07/27) and on other lists. I've also seen many corportae mail with
empty subject (forgotten, or considered irrelevant by the sender). It
even happens to me from time to time (delete the subject to replace
mouss wrote:
It
even happens to me from time to time (delete the subject to replace it,
then see an error in the body, switch to correct the body, then forget
that the subject was deleted).
*blink* What happened to the New Message button (or whatever it's
been (re)labelled this week)
Title: Test: anyone else getting a deltahealthgroup bounce?
yes, and administrators should unsub someone who is doing
stuff like this.
From: Chris Santerre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September
05, 2006 12:05 PMTo: SaTalk (E-mail)Cc:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
D.J. wrote:
OK, after Googling around for a bit, I may have stumbled on
something... specifically this trust path thing. I had my
trusted_networks and internal_networks set as my SMTP's and MX's
class C network. Because of that, is that causing SA to look at the
relay
Heute (05.09.2006/19:09 Uhr) schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt,
* Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo und Guten Abend spamassassin-users,
I`ve installed SA 3.1.5 on Debian Woody (Perl v5.6.1)
and see the following error:
--snip
spamassassin --lint
[[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:41:19PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
spamassassin --lint
[[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 588.
perl -MNet::DNS -e'print $Net::DNS::VERSION\n;'
0.58
You apparently have
John D. Hardin wrote:
You also might want to upgrade to 3.1.3 or 3.1.4, and make sure you're
running sa-update at least weekly.
Any reason not to use 3.1.5? It includes some improvements to sa-update
itself.
Daryl
D.J. wrote:
D.J. wrote:
OK, after Googling around for a bit, I may have stumbled on
something... specifically this trust path thing. I had my
trusted_networks and internal_networks set as my SMTP's and MX's
class C network. Because of that, is that causing SA to look at the
relay
Bowie Bailey wrote:
You should also list any other mail servers that accept mail for your
domain. This includes email gateways and relays under your control.
This can also include your ISP's mailservers, but if you do that, make
sure to specify internal_networks separately and leave the ISP's
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
You also might want to upgrade to 3.1.3 or 3.1.4, and make sure you're
running sa-update at least weekly.
Any reason not to use 3.1.5? It includes some improvements to
sa-update itself.
No, I'm just a little
Gestern (05.09.2006/22:47 Uhr) schrieb Theo Van Dinter,
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:41:19PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
spamassassin --lint
[[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 588.
perl -MNet::DNS -e'print
Hello,
Running SA 3.1.4, I see messages such as these in the log file:
Sep 6 00:05:21 tracy spamd[1710]: prefork: child states: KKI
From the code the various letters seem to indicate killed, initialised,
busy etc. My question though is are these just informational type
messages? Are they
Chris Thielen wrote:
Matt,
Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue
publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to
wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional
updates foreseen it should probably be removed from RDJ altogether.
Matt Kettler wrote:
Chris Thielen wrote:
Matt,
Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue
publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to
wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional
updates foreseen it should probably be removed from
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, e2rd wrote:
I would like to add headers X-Spam-Status, X-Spam-Level, X-Spam-Flag to
every e-mail tested by SpamAssassin.
Try report_safe 0
Shouldn't that be report_safe 1?
No, report_safe =
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Chris Thielen wrote:
Matt,
Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue
publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to
wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional
updates foreseen it should
DAve wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Chris Thielen wrote:
Matt,
Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue
publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to
wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional
updates foreseen
Using the newest SA with Amavisd
Most of my messages keep getting hit by EMPTY_MESSSAGE and
MISSING_SUBJECT when these are plaintext emails with subjects and
messages
Where should I start troubleshooting?
--
View this message in context:
50 matches
Mail list logo
