Thanks for your help.
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Admin
QualiSpace - A QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India: +91 (22) 6792 - 1480
Tel US: +1 (614) 827 - 1224
Fax India: +91 (22) 2530 - 3166
URL: http://www.qualispace.com
===
For Any Technical Query
I did that in the loca.cf file but it's not refecting. What do I have to do
after modifying the local.cf file.
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Admin
QualiSpace - A QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India: +91 (22) 6792 - 1480
Tel US: +1 (614) 827 - 1224
Fax India: +91 (22) 2530 -
1) That should be local.cf.
2) Restart spamassassin or the tool that has spamassassin daemonized.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Suhas (QualiSpace) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did that in the loca.cf file but it's not refecting. What do I have to do
after modifying the local.cf file.
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:31:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What can I do to catch and handle Spam that has profanity with fuzzy
matching?
Is there anything that has a good level of accuracy of trapping porn spam?
Try the SARE Adult ruleset.
I'm planning to
upgrade my server from SA 3.1.5 to SA 3.1.7 and want to be sure that I had well
understoodabout theses warnings :
spamassassin
--lint[19969] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule
X_OSIRU_DUL[19969] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule
The rules in question almost by definition don't address spam, they
address whether people are peeved at how hard it is to contact a
domain's postmaster. Which is why I dispute the score attached to them.
I've also been annoyed by Yahoo FPs based on the RFCI list. However:
1) In my
Hello,
Can anybody explain me why SA did not flagged this message
as spam?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-81.0 required=4.5
tests=BAYES_40,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_90_100,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,
On Friday 13 October 2006 00:11, Suhas (QualiSpace) wrote:
USER_IN_WHITELIST
--
_
John Andersen
John D. Hardin writes:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
For the purposes of SpamAssassin, it only matters if spam is
filtered and ham is let through. As I keep harping on, I don't
think it's SpamAssassin's job to crusade for abuse@/postmaster@
compliance.
The rules in
On Friday 13 October 2006 00:23, Justin Mason wrote:
John D. Hardin writes:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
For the purposes of SpamAssassin, it only matters if spam is
filtered and ham is let through. As I keep harping on, I don't
think it's SpamAssassin's job to crusade for
Hello,
We are running v3.1.5 with mimedefang.
Here is our setup :
our own MTA with spamassassin ---/-- MTA at our ISP, our MX is HERE
w.x.y.z / INTERNET
In the local.cf file we have :
trusted_networks w.x.y.z # Our MX
Every time mimedefang spawn a child, we get this warning in
Justin Mason wrote:
OTOH, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, and DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS will
likely not make it into the next release going by those rates.
Thank-you very kindly for your work.
I apologize (to all) for any overzealousness on my part. I realize I
addressed the issue on a
On Oct 13, 2006, at 4:11 AM, Suhas (QualiSpace) wrote:Can anybody explain me why SA did not flagged this message as spam? X-Spam-Status: No, score=-81.0 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_40,HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,HTML_90_100,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,
Hi!
Max Clark said the following, On Friday 13 October 2006 04:57 AM:
I have seen an increase in the amount of spam that has made its way
through our filters and in to our inboxes. Most of this seems to be
the stock pitches that are image attachments. Is there any way to
effectively combat
Yes, that was the prb.
Thanks
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Administrator
QualiSpace - A QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India: +91 (22) 6792 - 1480
Tel US: +1 (614) 827 - 1224
Fax India: +91 (22) 2530 - 3166
URL: http://www.qualispace.com
Ok, just understood the reason of the warnings : I
found a no_osiru.cf file in my
/etc/mail/spamassassin
no-osiru.cf:score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM
0no-osiru.cf:score
X_OSIRU_DUL
0no-osiru.cf:score
X_OSIRU_DUL_FH
0no-osiru.cf:score
X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY
0no-osiru.cf:score
X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC
Currently I am using
spamassassin version 3.0.3 on a Debian 3.1 sarge (stable release) linux system.
According to Debian this version is stable but is more than a year old. Which
version should I use, or must I use, to maintain a stable environment? Still go
on with version 3.0.3 or upgrade
Version 3.1.3 is available from sarge-backports. This source is stable
enough but do give you some recent version of programs like spamassassin.
Check the backports:
Adjust your /etc/apt/sources.list
# BACKPORTS
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main contrib non-free
You
Gilles Hamel wrote:
Hello,
We are running v3.1.5 with mimedefang.
Here is our setup :
our own MTA with spamassassin ---/-- MTA at our ISP, our MX is HERE
w.x.y.z / INTERNET
In the local.cf file we have :
trusted_networks w.x.y.z # Our MX
Every time mimedefang spawn a
On Friday 01 Sep 2006 10:23, Justin Mason wrote:
There's also a very good ruleset I've been using for a while now, at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_vbou
nce.cf
It catches almost all my unwanted bounces. Requires a little hand-editing
before it'll
Is there anyway to get points added if the sending mail
server has no PTR record (unknown [196.211.162.65])?
I am using Redhat Fedora and Spamassassin 3.1.2 and Postfix
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.2 (2006-05-25) on
SPAM1
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0
Bob Mortimer writes:
On Friday 01 Sep 2006 10:23, Justin Mason wrote:
There's also a very good ruleset I've been using for a while now, at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/rules/trunk/sandbox/jm/20_vbou
nce.cf
It catches almost all my unwanted bounces. Requires a little
Title: Having issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
HTMLHEADTITLEJoin the thousands of people who got slim/TITLE
/HEAD
BODY
IMG alt= hspace=0 src="" align=baseline border=0
p
/p
Note the img tag.
It's using
Title: Having issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
Im trying to write a rule to score
src="" but I cant seem to get it right. Can somebody shed some
light on what Id use for the 20_phrases.cf file so I can start scoring
this? Thanks.
Dylan
From: Thomas Lindell
Title: Having issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
but whas is the CID . Is that some sort of alternate
notation for an ip address?
From: Dylan Bouterse
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:38
AMTo: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE: Having
issue
Robert Swan wrote:
Is there anyway to get points added if the sending mail
server has no PTR record (unknown [196.211.162.65])?
Received: from lyonop.com (unknown [196.211.162.65])
This is totally untested, but:
header LOCAL_INVALID_PTR Received =~ /\(unknown /
This might be more
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:24:11PM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
I sometimes wonder if 3.1.5 broke something in razor report because
that is when I first noticed it seemed to be ineffective to report.
I'm not quite sure why people think SA changed or is broken. If you're
seeing different
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Thomas Lindell wrote:
but whas is the CID . Is that some sort of alternate notation for an ip
address?
Short for Content-ID, it'll be a reference to a MIME part (with a Content-ID
header matching that value) in the message.
--
Randomly Selected
Robert Swan wrote:
Is there anyway to get points added if the sending mail server has no
PTR record *(unknown [196.211.162.65])?*
I am using Redhat Fedora and Spamassassin 3.1.2 and Postfix
I was looking for the same thing some time ago, but I couldn't easily
find a way to do that in SA.
Thomas Lindell wrote:
but whas is the CID . Is that some sort of alternate notation for an
ip address?
It's a reference to an attached image.
--
Andreas
I don't see anything attached to the message though.
Even when I view the source I don't see a mime attachment.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pettersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:14 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Having issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to install FuzzyOCR on RHEL4 x86_64.
When running configure for libgocr-0.7.2 I get
configure: error: Cannot find PNM library
Yet,
I have 'netpbm', 'netpbm-prog' and 'netpbm-devel' packages installed and
libnetpbm.so.* are available.
As is usually the answer, if you're interested in knowing what's
going on, run
with -D (and in this case, the reporter facility), and you can
see the razor
agent debug output. ie:
$ spamassassin -r -D reporter message
[...]
Oct 13 10:50:43.803625 report[512]: [ 5] mail 1.0, eng 4:
On 10/13/06 17:12, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
Robert Swan wrote:
Is there anyway to get points added if the sending mail server has no
PTR record *(unknown [196.211.162.65])?*
I am using Redhat Fedora and Spamassassin 3.1.2 and Postfix
With a postfix mail gateway, I use a local SA rule
Thomas Lindell wrote:
I don't see anything attached to the message though.
Even when I view the source I don't see a mime attachment.
Well, the attachment is missing then.
Come to think of it, that would be some excellent rule :-]
--
Andreas
On 10/13/06 17:34, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Received =~ /from \S{1,30} \(unknown
\[\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\]\)\s+by\s+your\.smtp\.server\.desy/
Replace your.smtp.server by your server's name ...
Oops, and leave out \.desy of course ;)
And - just to make sure - that's a header
Hello:
Is it possible to configure spamassassin to update itself with some rule
sets categories?
Today what I know is that exist some sites on internet where I download
rulesets periodically, I was thinking to have features inside the
configuration files of spamassassin like
* On 13/10/06 15:52 +, enediel gonzalez wrote:
| Hello:
|
| Is it possible to configure spamassassin to update itself with some rule
| sets categories?
|
| Today what I know is that exist some sites on internet where I download
| rulesets periodically, I was thinking to have features
Jeroen Tebbens wrote:
Version 3.1.3 is available from sarge-backports. This source is stable
enough but do give you some recent version of programs like spamassassin.
Agreed. I highly recommend sarge-backports for spamassassin.
Check the backports:
Adjust your /etc/apt/sources.list
#
Gary V wrote:
I failed to find an example where a client or clients can be excluded
from a network that is configured in internal_networks. Some stupid NAT
boxes proxy the mail so it appears to come from that host. I would like
to include the internal network in internal_networks, but exclude
I copied the VBounce.pm and 20_vbounce.cf from the rulesrc SVN repository,
path sandbox/jm, into my 3.1.x rules dir, then modified the code for
have_any_bounce_relays() to output a warning; sure enough, running
spamassassin --lint output it just fine.
It really seems likely that the .pm and .cf
Gary V wrote:
I failed to find an example where a client or clients can be excluded from
a network that is configured in internal_networks. Some stupid NAT boxes
proxy the mail so it appears to come from that host. I would like to
include the internal network in internal_networks, but exclude
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 06:58:42PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
| Is it possible to configure spamassassin to update itself with some rule
| sets categories?
You can cron-ize sa-update to do this.
FWIW, the official SA rulesets aren't broken up into groups, it's really an
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:35:33PM +0530, Suhas (QualiSpace) wrote:
I have added those to the local.cf but doesn't seems to be working, what
could be the reason?
These rule score adjustments depend on having added some of the SARE
rules; I'm not sure which set they're from.
-- Clifton
...
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:08:23PM -0700, Max Clark wrote:
Thanks - this is exactly what I was looking for.
-Max
On 10/12/06, Kelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max Clark wrote:
I have seen an increase in the amount of spam that has made its way
through our filters and in to our inboxes.
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:35:33PM +0530, Suhas (QualiSpace) wrote:
I have added those to the local.cf but doesn't seems to be working,
what could be the reason?
These rule score adjustments depend on having added some of the SARE
rules; I'm not sure which set
James Lay wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Zeikat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:49 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is there any way to score this?
On 10/13/06 17:34, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Received =~ /from \S{1,30}
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, alex wrote:
just got a bunch of bounced mails that have my ip in the header,
but I checked my mail logs and don't see any relaying.
does that mean the header is forged?
I've seen lots of this over the last couple of months. It seems to be
related to malware activity,
On Friday 13 Oct 2006 17:55, Justin Mason wrote:
I copied the VBounce.pm and 20_vbounce.cf from the rulesrc SVN repository,
path sandbox/jm, into my 3.1.x rules dir, then modified the code for
have_any_bounce_relays() to output a warning; sure enough, running
spamassassin --lint output it
--On Friday, October 13, 2006 9:23 AM +0100 Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please bear in mind, also, that there are 5 different rules that
use RFCI data, and they have wildly varying accuracies and scores:
SPAM%HAM%S/ORANKSCORE NAME
3.7247 0.0540 0.986 0.85
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Friday, October 13, 2006 9:23 AM +0100 Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please bear in mind, also, that there are 5 different rules that
use RFCI data, and they have wildly varying accuracies and scores:
SPAM%HAM%S/ORANKSCORE NAME
3.7247
John Rudd wrote:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Friday, October 13, 2006 9:23 AM +0100 Justin Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please bear in mind, also, that there are 5 different rules that
use RFCI data, and they have wildly varying accuracies and scores:
SPAM%HAM%S/ORANKSCORE
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 10:38 -0400, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
I’m trying to write a rule to score src=cid” but I can’t seem to get
it right. Can somebody shed some light on what I’d use for the
20_phrases.cf file so I can start scoring this? Thanks.
Here's what I am using with success:
rawbody
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Jo for Groups and Lists wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:01:32 -0400
From: Jo for Groups and Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Having issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
Are you using Outlook by any chance? If you are,
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 15:22 -0600, Chris Stone wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 10:38 -0400, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
I’m trying to write a rule to score src=cid” but I can’t seem to get
it right. Can somebody shed some light on what I’d use for the
20_phrases.cf file so I can start scoring this?
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Jo for Groups and Lists wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:01:32 -0400
From: Jo for Groups and Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Having issue with a type of spam I havn't seen before
Are you using Outlook by any chance? If
I think I already know the answer to this, but does FuzzyOCR process
all frames of an animated GIF?
I think the answer is no, because the spam that's getting through
untagged by FOCR contains multi-frame animated GIF images, the second-
to-last last frame of which contains the commercial
Thanks bowie.
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Admin
QualiSpace - A QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India: +91 (22) 6792 - 1480
Tel US: +1 (614) 827 - 1224
Fax India: +91 (22) 2530 - 3166
URL: http://www.qualispace.com
===
For Any Technical Query Please
58 matches
Mail list logo
