Thanks, you were correct. It works I re built it in your order. Thanks every
one for the help. Matthew
_
From: maillist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 January 2007 19:53
To: Matthew Bickerton
Cc: 'Daryl C. W. O'Shea'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamc using
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Monty Ree wrote:
So in order to train bayes this mail with sa-learn to ham, I forwarded this
mail using outlook or outlook express to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this mail would be
saved at /var/spool/mail/ham.
and if I execute like this, this would be meaningful or
I had a customer requesting a whitelist of an address this morning. I
always look them up to see the SA score. This one seems to be a FP on
the FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK rule, see below. I say this due to finding
numerous posting via a google search, sonmeone even suggested disabling
this buggy rule.
-Original Message-
From: Roman Serbski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:52 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Razor2 servers are down?
Hi list,
It looks like Razor2 servers are down? SA stopped checking messages
for me this morning with the
You need to 'rediscover ' razor
razor-admin -discover -d
Hi list,
It looks like Razor2 servers are down? SA stopped checking
messages for me this morning with the following in razor-agent.log:
According to my logs, Razor went down sometime between:
Jan 30 21:39:05 fl (last contact
Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, list.
I would like to ask some about bayes.
If I have recevied ham mail which written ***SPAM***, So in order to
train bayes this mail with sa-learn to ham, I forwarded this mail
using outlook or outlook express to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this mail would
be saved at
I am using MySQL as the bayes database and I am starting to run into
problems when auto-expiry happens. I thought the ntokens was supposed
to be under 15, why is mine 3 million? Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
I'm running SA v3.1.7, under Perl v5.8.5 on a RedHat ES4 box. I call
spamc from each user's ~/.procmailrc.
I recently started using Botnet (v0.7) on several servers, and find
it's terrific. But today, I saw my first false positive. Here is the
report and the mail header:
Content analysis
[botnet0.7,ip=66.251.54.6,hostname=outbox2.onceanddone.com,maildomain=onceanddone.com,baddns]
host 66.251.54.6
6.54.251.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer outbox2.onceanddone.com.
host outbox2.onceanddone.com
outbox2.onceanddone.com has address 66.251.51.6
host 66.251.51.6
Host
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:21:08PM +0100, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
[botnet0.7,ip=66.251.54.6,hostname=outbox2.onceanddone.com,maildomain=onceanddone.com,baddns]
host 66.251.54.6
6.54.251.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer outbox2.onceanddone.com.
host outbox2.onceanddone.com
Matt Kettler wrote:
Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, list.
I would like to ask some about bayes.
If I have recevied ham mail which written ***SPAM***, So in order to
train bayes this mail with sa-learn to ham, I forwarded this mail
using outlook or outlook express to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this
Not every time I respond, but sometimes, when I reply to this maillist,
I get a bounce-back that starts off like this:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry
R Lists06 wrote:
I have disabled botnet for now
You can still use BotNet 0.6, it works fine
HTH
Oliver
--
Oliver Schulze L. | Get my e-mail after a captcha in:
Asuncion - Paraguay | http://tinymailto.com/oliver
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Proctor, Scott wrote:
I am using MySQL as the bayes database and I am starting to run into
problems when auto-expiry happens. I thought the ntokens was supposed
to be under 15, why is mine 3 million? Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
If an
I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
enabled.
The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
SA is
in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of these is user_prefs.
In same folder added a new rule I made (a .cf file) and
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:59:30 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
enabled.
The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
SA is
in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of these is
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:59:30AM -0800, z3r0 wrote:
I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
enabled.
The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
SA is
in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of these is user_prefs.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
header PALABRAS_MALAS_SUBJECT Subject =~ /\belefantes|ilegales|africanos\b
describe PALABRAS_MALAS_SUBJECT Contiene palabras malas en el asunto
score PALABRAS_MALAS_SUBJECT 1.1
My questions:
1) Is the rule ok?
You probably want it to end with /i
4)
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:59:30 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
enabled.
The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
SA is
in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of these is
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:05:12PM +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
..and don't forget to restart spamassassin (also make sure you run
--lint)
To note, one doesn't need to restart spamd when there's changes to the
user_prefs file. His issue is that unless spamd's specifically configured
to allow
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad icon, but the
original cf files
I have in my ftp, has no icon.
So perhaps that's not the way...
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:10:14 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad icon, but the
original cf files
I have in my ftp, has no icon.
So
On Thursday 01 February 2007 3:10 pm, z3r0 wrote:
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad icon, but the
original cf files
I have in my ftp, has no icon.
So perhaps that's not
z3r0 wrote:
I'm a common user, just have a hosting account and spamassassin 3.1.7
enabled.
The only directory in all my ftp folder that contains something related to
SA is
in root .spamassassin, where lives just 4 files, one of these is
user_prefs.
In same folder added a new rule I
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
Yes.
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad
icon, but the original cf files I have in my ftp, has no icon.
I generally have to use Wordpad with cf files supplied by others
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:10:14 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad icon, but the
original cf files
I have
On 02/01/07 z3r0 wrote:
Depending on the level of access you have to your Linux box I'd
suggest writing them in joe or vi from the command line. linux can
get
very picky about line breaks in files created in windows.
I can't lint anything, I just have a CPanel access and my wordpad.
This
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:52:02 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:10:14 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
I notice that files that I
Hello z3r0,
Thursday, February 1, 2007, 3:10:14 PM, you wrote:
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad icon, but the
original cf files
I have in my ftp, has no icon.
So
Maciej Friedel wrote:
On 02/01/07 z3r0 wrote:
Depending on the level of access you have to your Linux box I'd
suggest writing them in joe or vi from the command line. linux
can get very picky about line breaks in files created in windows.
I can't lint anything, I just have a CPanel
I am looking for some advise on which rules to apply:
Where are the guidelines for (not) applying rules like antidrug.cf? I
see the header stipulates that it is not intended for v3.0 and higher.
If these stipulations exist, are they always found in the comments of
each cf or can I find this
Fred T wrote:
Hello z3r0,
Thursday, February 1, 2007, 3:10:14 PM, you wrote:
Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
yourfile.cf (with quotes)
I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad icon, but the
original cf files
I have in my ftp, has no
Hello Clay,
Thursday, February 1, 2007, 4:48:42 PM, you wrote:
I am looking for some advise on which rules to apply:
Where are the guidelines for (not) applying rules like antidrug.cf? I see the header stipulates that it is not intended for v3.0 and higher. If these stipulations
Jan Doberstein wrote:
deepak schrieb:
Suddenly, i notice huge cpu usage by SA on 3 different servers. nothing
was changed in custom rules or configuration recently. kindly suggest,
what might have been casing this.
awl enable ?
No, awl is not enabled. also custom rules are less
Clay Davis wrote:
I am looking for some advise on which rules to apply:
Where are the guidelines for (not) applying rules like antidrug.cf?
I see the header stipulates that it is not intended for v3.0 and
higher. If these stipulations exist, are they always found in the
comments of each
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:19:53 +0530, deepak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jan Doberstein wrote:
deepak schrieb:
Suddenly, i notice huge cpu usage by SA on 3 different servers. nothing
was changed in custom rules or configuration recently. kindly suggest,
what might have been casing this.
HI all,
I have been running sendmail dual mta+amavis+spamassassin+milter-spiff,
also on every stmp there is a access-list that permit only working
address to be accepted.
This setup as been working fine on 5 servers for a while now each
servers blocking a average of 300K connections per
Asked my hosting about the issue. The response was:
We do not allow clients to install custom SpamAssassin rules.
That's terrible. Why can't users decide what rules to use. I want a life
spam free...
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:59:30 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
Asked my hosting about the issue. The response was: We do not
allow clients to install custom SpamAssassin rules.
That's terrible. Why can't users decide what rules to use. I want
a life spam free...
A user could easily define a set of rules that would
z3r0 wrote:
Asked my hosting about the issue. The response was:
We do not allow clients to install custom SpamAssassin rules.
That's terrible. Why can't users decide what rules to use. I want a life
spam free...
Myself, I'd be afraid of a provider who did allow user rules. It's
trivial to
As commented in other post my hosting doesn't allow custom rules.
I don't know if they don't like happy people, or what.
Is there some kind of installation I can perform with my limitations in
order to use
custom rules?
Is that a common policy of hosting providers?
All I have access to is to
rules that would kill system performance
I suppoused rules were nice and good, no time-bombs.
So any chances for me or I must forget SA?
Daryl C. W. O wrote:
z3r0 wrote:
Asked my hosting about the issue. The response was:
We do not allow clients to install custom SpamAssassin rules.
I'm seeing all my spam and those with images and lot of nonsense words only
scores 1.5.
Great for spammers awfull for all the rest of the world.
Since I can't use custom rules because I'm a normal hosting user. I have to
receive
those uglly spams daily.
Any other way? I'm really sick of spam.
z3r0 wrote:
rules that would kill system performance
I suppoused rules were nice and good, no time-bombs.
I'm not sure what you're saying there.
So any chances for me or I must forget SA?
That, of course, is up to you. If you've got a shell account that you
can run whatever you want on,
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:34:09 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
z3r0 wrote:
rules that would kill system performance
I suppoused rules were nice and good, no time-bombs.
I'm not sure what you're saying there.
So any chances for me or I must forget SA?
That, of course, is up
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:29:13PM -0800, z3r0 wrote:
Since I can't use custom rules because I'm a normal hosting user. I have to
receive those uglly spams daily.
Any other way? I'm really sick of spam.
It sounds like your main issue is that you're unhappy with the service
from your current
My hosting is cool, but I'm spammed. Never thought custom rules
where something beyond common users, but seems like it is.
Perhaps living with pharmaceutical messages in inbox is not
so bad when you get used to.
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:29:13PM -0800, z3r0 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:29:13 -0800 (PST), z3r0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing all my spam and those with images and lot of nonsense words only
scores 1.5.
Great for spammers awfull for all the rest of the world.
Since I can't use custom rules because I'm a normal hosting user. I have to
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
rules that would kill system performance
I suppoused rules were nice and good, no time-bombs.
A hosting provider can't make the assumption that all their customers
will play nice (or, for that matter, are competent).
So any chances for me or I must forget SA?
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
I'm seeing all my spam and those with images and lot of nonsense
words only scores 1.5.
You may want to see whether your hosting provider is using any of the
SARE rules, the image info plugin or the fuzzyOCR plugin. They may be
willing to implement those if
From my hosting admin:
We do not allow custom rules for customers because those custom rules would
apply server-wide and not to that particular user. Your custom rulesets
could actually end up blocking legit mail for other customers and this in
turn would make some people very mad.
You can add
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
My hosting is cool, but I'm spammed. Never thought custom rules where
something beyond common users, but seems like it is. Perhaps living with
pharmaceutical messages in inbox is not so bad when you get used to.
Er, ... pardon me for jumping into this thread.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 16:02 -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
My hosting is cool, but I'm spammed. Never thought custom rules where
something beyond common users, but seems like it is. Perhaps living with
pharmaceutical messages in inbox is not so bad when you get
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, z3r0 wrote:
From my hosting admin:
You can add custom test rules to your user_prefs file in your home directory
if you wish.
Good...
In case I want to add 3 rules just paste all that text in there and that's
enough?
Just to confirm that works, try putting this into
Hi Theo,
Did the fix we discussed drop me off the list as well?
Kind regards
Nigel
I'm not much of a coder but I needed something for a client so they
didn't have to call me to add addresses to the whitelist or blacklist,
I'm sure other here can improve on this but thought maybe someone else
needs this also.
---code---
#!/bin/bash
if [ ! $# == 2 ]; then
echo Usage:%0
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
host 66.251.54.6
6.54.251.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer outbox2.onceanddone.com.
host outbox2.onceanddone.com
outbox2.onceanddone.com has address 66.251.51.6
host 66.251.51.6
Host 6.51.251.66.in-addr.arpa not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Yep, I get them too.
If you trace back through the headers quoted in one it looks like the
admin of billmerriam.com screwed up and the server is looping mail back
to the list. (ie: it's delivering mail based on the To: header instead
of the envelope.)
maillist wrote:
Not every time I respond,
As commented in other post my hosting doesn't allow custom rules.
I don't know if they don't like happy people, or what.
Is there some kind of installation I can perform with my limitations in
order to use
custom rules?
Is that a common policy of hosting providers?
All I have
Hi there
I have an old machine running Suse 9.0 with SA version 2.55 .
For certain reasons I am not able to update the whole system but as there is
too much undetected Spam I need to update SA.
Does anyone have suggestion how to install an up-to date SpamAssassin on this
system?
Any hints are
Here is a typical error report in the log file:
Feb 1 11:31:47 yellowsrv amavis[11701]: (11701-03) (!)collect_results
from [] (/usr/bin/ripole): exit 30 ripOLE: decoding of
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20070201T113001-11701/parts/p002 resulted
in error 30\n
I'm using
Name: ripole
61 matches
Mail list logo
