I am running SpamAssassin version 3.0.1 running on Perl version 5.8.6
on an Xserve G5.
When I try to test the spamassassin execution using 'spamassassin -tD
[test message]'
I receive the following:
I type 'spamassassin -tD 16146.'
and a bunch of debug results plus the end which looks like
I receive different results running the 'sa-learn --dump magic'
command depending on the user.
Running as user ‘atom’:
sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 8902 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0
Hi,
I read all about sa-learn in SA's wiki, but still have some doubts:
1) The spam and ham are regular mail accounts, right ?
2) After a user receives a false negative or a false positive, what
should they do ? Reply to the correspondent mail account ? Forward ?
I don't think so, but i'm
Kelsey Forsythe wrote:
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.0.1 running on Perl version 5.8.6
on an Xserve G5.
When I try to test the spamassassin execution using 'spamassassin -tD
[test message]'
I receive the following:
I type 'spamassassin -tD 16146.'
and a bunch of debug results plus
Kelsey Forsythe wrote:
I receive different results running the 'sa-learn --dump magic'
command depending on the user.
That's normal.
Which is truly the one used by the SpamAssassin program?
Which one is truly being used to call the SpamAssassin program? The
answer depends on how you've set
Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
On 3/2/07, Sietse van Zanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops, forgot to mention, you need to feed a sample message to
spamassassin
-D --lint or it will not do network and RBL checks, only local checks.
-Sietse
below is the result for spamassassin -D message on
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I read all about sa-learn in SA's wiki, but still have some doubts:
1) The spam and ham are regular mail accounts, right ?
SA has not created any mail accounts anywhere.
spam and ham are comamnd-line parameters to the sa-learn program. You
feed sa-learn mail
Hi,
Thank you for your enlightment.
A few details if you may please.
SA has not created any mail accounts anywhere.
Yes, i'm aware of that.
I wondered if i should create them so that sa-learn could fetch the
messages from there.
spam and ham are comamnd-line parameters to the sa-learn
Hi
sa-learn --spam spammail.txt
sa-learn --ham nonspammail.txt
Well, so now the question is: how do i feed those .txt files ?
That's all i need to know.
One possibility is that you have file-access to the mail directory.
The other (what I use on a server) is to fetch mails with
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
ALL, depending which user is the recipient.
If you want a site wide bayes, you should set that up. (run spamd with
-u 'username')
Users receive different e-mails, so their bayes db tokens will be
different too.
Excellent! This is something I've been wondering about
Hi All,
I've recently invested in some books and software to help me figure
out what I *thought* I already knew pretty well (regex). As was
pointed out by a kind list member, there are various 'flavours' of
regex. Can anyone tell me which particular flavour I'm best
concentrating on for SA rules?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
pointed out by a kind list member, there are various 'flavours' of
regex. Can anyone tell me which particular flavour I'm best
concentrating on for SA rules?
man perlre
- -- Matthias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
hello,
hope someone can help me. basically i'm new to all this and never setup this
freebsd box (with spam assassin and clam av). we use this box to filter mail
before it is sent to our exchange box, and now i broke it.
i was running out of space and normally i clear up the /var/spool/mqueue
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Why doesn't this list have something similar? This list could have [SA
User] in the subject and the Developer's list
Don Ireland wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Maybe, just maybe, you can filter through e-mail adresseses instead of
subjects.
-- Mário Gamito
Mário Gamito wrote:
Don Ireland wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Maybe, just maybe, you can filter through e-mail adresseses instead of
subjects.
Doc Schneider wrote:
Mário Gamito wrote:
Don Ireland wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Maybe, just maybe, you can filter through e-mail adresseses
Don Ireland wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Why doesn't this list have something similar?
Please don't start up that discussion again!
Check
On Mar 3, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Mário Gamito wrote:
Don Ireland wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it
is a mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Maybe, just maybe, you can filter through e-mail
On 3/3/07, Don Ireland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Why doesn't this list have something similar?
Because it's a really
Graham Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or even filter on the List-ID: or other RFC2191 headers.
Ooops RFC 2919
Brian Wilson wrote:
On Mar 3, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Mário Gamito wrote:
Don Ireland wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Maybe, just maybe, you can
Bart Schaefer wrote:
On 3/3/07, Don Ireland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Why doesn't this list have something similar?
OK sorry. Didn't realize it was such a sore spot. :)
You must not subscribe to very many technical mailing lists. Most of
the mailing lists that I subscribe to preserve the precious small amount
of visible subject line space
I've been a part of a few--although not computer related (prefer
Don Ireland wrote:
Every email list I've ever subscribed to has had something in the
subject line (usually in square brackets) to identify 1) that it is a
mailing list and 2) what list it is.
Why doesn't this list have something similar?
It does. It's got a List-Id header.
List-Id:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Mário Gamito wrote:
SA has not created any mail accounts anywhere.
Yes, i'm aware of that.
I wondered if i should create them so that sa-learn could fetch the messages
from there.
If you want your users to be able to bounce/resend messages to the
accounts, then yes,
Hi,
If you want your users to be able to bounce/resend messages to the
accounts, then yes, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be
just normal mailboxes.
Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't the answer to your question
right above it?
I use Maildir, therefore i din't have a
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
If you want your users to be able to bounce/resend messages to the
accounts, then yes, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be
just normal mailboxes.
Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't the answer to your question
right above it?
I use Maildir,
-Original Message-
From: mrj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 3:57 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: help! i'm a newbie and just broke our spam assassin / clamav
3)
/var/spool/MD-Quarantine -- i deleted all the subfolders and
files in
The above line in my local.cf on version 3.1.7 produced
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=48.6 required=5.0tests=AWL=1.313,BAYES_99=5,
BOTNET=5,DCC_CHECK=2.17,DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.765,FM_MULTI_ODD2=1.1,
This has quit working for 3.1.8 and only produces this output
-Spam-Status: Yes,
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Mário Gamito wrote:
I use Maildir, therefore i din't have a single file for sa-learn to act upon
Sure you do. Each message is a single file. Just run:
for msg in /var/spool/spam/*; do
sa-learn --spam /var/spool/spam/${msg}
done
Or, if you really wanted to make a
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Chris wrote:
The above line in my local.cf on version 3.1.7 produced
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=48.6 required=5.0tests=AWL=1.313,BAYES_99=5,
BOTNET=5,DCC_CHECK=2.17,DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.765,FM_MULTI_ODD2=1.1,
This has quit working for 3.1.8 and only
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the output?
That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
causing that line to not get used. Have you run spamassassin --lint ?
--
Randomly Selected
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
output?
That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
causing that line to not get used.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:51:03PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
causing that line to not get used. Have you run spamassassin --lint ?
What config line? Chris didn't list a config line.
The subject of this thread is a
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:51:03PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
causing that line to not get used. Have you run spamassassin --lint
?
What config line? Chris
On Saturday 03 March 2007 10:40 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
output?
That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
causing that line to not get
On Saturday 03 March 2007 10:51 pm, John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
output?
That config line is fine. My guess is that you
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Chris wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007 10:51 pm, John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:20:17PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Is there any reason why the actual rule scores stopped being in the
output?
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:10:33PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
What config line? Chris didn't list a config line.
The subject of this thread is a config line.
Oh, that one.
No, its not fine.
it should be tests=_TESTSSCORES_
Why is that not ok? a) it works fine in a cf file -- I
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Why is that not ok?
Cuz it doesn't work?
--
_
John Andersen
pgphFmMfiALje.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:11:46PM -0600, Chris wrote:
That config line is fine. My guess is that you have an error elsewhere
causing that line to not get used. Have you run spamassassin --lint ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ spamassassin --lint
No errors are shown
Hrm. Is that config file
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:19:49PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
Cuz it doesn't work?
We could go back and forth all night about this, but I'm going to stop
with this message. If you cut/paste that line into a config file and
run a message through a functional 3.1.8, as I have done, you will find
43 matches
Mail list logo
