Re: [sa-list] Re: Default Plugins?

2007-08-04 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:59:31PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Is there some default mechanism loading these things (for example, I notice loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM is only in v312.pre), and is it safe to remove the old ones? So then, what if, for example,

Re: Greeting card

2007-08-04 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:17:30PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: also, not everyone is using SARE rules, and I think that until SA devels won't trust them to include them into SA, many admins will not install them. On 03.08.07 18:14, Theo Van Dinter wrote: fwiw, it has nothing to do

Re: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SareChannels

2007-08-04 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I notice the above page is immutable, for some reason. You're not logged in. I noticed, upon trying to use the instructions at http://saupdates.openprotect.com/, that there IS no DNS record for 3.2.2 updates there, and I cannot edit the page to reflect

Re: hallmark greeting card spam and broken spf records.

2007-08-04 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Friday 03 August 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote: (yes, spf is broken) especially when companies like hallmark, who know they are being used as 'phishing' targets list the whole world as authoritative mail servers. That does not mean spf is broken. MX is not broken when someone sets his

Re: What is bug 5548

2007-08-04 Thread Justin Mason
Rosenbaum, Larry M. writes: In the SA 3.2.2 announcement was this item: - bug 5548: Certain mail input can take a long time to scan with 100% CPU utilisation, due to backtracking in a rule's regexp. fix but when I went to look up the bug, I didn't have permission. Could somebody give

help

2007-08-04 Thread Devilish Entity

Re: [sa-list] Re: [sa-list] Re: Default Plugins?

2007-08-04 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:59:31PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Is there some default mechanism loading these things (for example, I notice loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM is only in v312.pre), and is it safe to remove the old

Re: [sa-list] Re: [sa-list] Re: Default Plugins?

2007-08-04 Thread Justin Mason
Dan Mahoney, System Admin writes: Notes in there such as: 'Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys is officialy outdated by Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM' would be nice things too (as presumably, nothing is going to ever REMOVE that old module from its installed location for those of

Re: help

2007-08-04 Thread Matt Kettler
Devilish Entity wrote: What form of help do you need?

Re: [sa-list] Re: [sa-list] Re: Default Plugins?

2007-08-04 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Even now, there could be functionality I'm missing, simply because I haven't installed every minor version in between. No, that's not correct. Every version includes all of the pre files and plugins from every version before it. If they're not present on

Re: [sa-list] Re: [sa-list] Re: Default Plugins?

2007-08-04 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Even now, there could be functionality I'm missing, simply because I haven't installed every minor version in between. No, that's not correct. Every version includes all of the pre files and plugins from every version before it. If the pre files aren't

Re: [sa-list] [sa-list] Default Plugins?

2007-08-04 Thread Kai Schaetzl
System Admin Dan Mahoney wrote on Sat, 4 Aug 2007 07:55:06 -0400 (EDT): 'Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys is officialy outdated by Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM' would be nice things too (as presumably, nothing is going to ever REMOVE that old module from its installed location

3.2.2: spamd_allow_user_rules fails

2007-08-04 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I upgraded on one of my systems from 3.1.4 to 3.2.2 without a problem. All in all very straight forward as always, thanks! I noticed that the spamd_allow_user_rules test failed. As I'm not going to use spamd this doesn't matter for me, but I'd be interested in any hints why it may have failed.

Re: Default Plugins?

2007-08-04 Thread Matt Kettler
Jason Haar wrote: Theo Van Dinter wrote: All pre files are used. Nothing is automatically loaded. There are multiple files, based on the release where the plugins that are loaded by that file were in. This way, we can add new plugins and the new pre file will get installed, and there's