Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my configuration and gave it a score
of 0.1.
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my configuration:
loadplugin
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my configuration:
loadplugin
John D. Hardin wrote on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:21:35 -0700 (PPT):
I think there was some consensus about using that in concert with an
excessive number of A records as a spam sign. Check the thread
history. I don't think anyone is suggesting by itself it's a useful
indicator.
This is what I had
Gene Heskett wrote on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:43:38 -0400:
1: sa-update is NOT pulling new PDFInfo.pm or pdfinfo.cf files even when they
are available.
of course not!
2: spamassassin --lint -D ignores these rules when we install them by hand.
which means you probably haven't installed PDFInfo
From: Paul Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS. Sorry for multiple postings, I only saved my message during
editing, but it seems to be sent every time :(
Control-S save draft.
Alt-S send.
Easy way to make the mistake.
Control-Enter is an instant send, which is annoying when you
fat finger and hit the
From: Paul Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
I included Plugin\Test.pm into my
I agree. To catch the fast-flux servers you have to check not only low
ttl values but ALSO how frequently the IP addresses assigned to that
domain change.
I think everyone is looking for a fast fast-flux fix. I believe, and
this is just my opinion, that a dnsbl is the way to go. That way if the
Paul Lenz wrote on 12.08.2007 11:23:
Actually I write Perl programs since many years, but I am not
so familiar with the object oriented programming and I can not
discover the secrets of Spamassassin. Contretely: I was not able
to access the body of a mail.
You should consult man perltoot
Alex Woick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is already very good. You have it. That text is the text
of the internal test message that is processed on every
SpamAssassin startup or --lint.
Ah! It does not come from an email, only from the startup!
Now I got it. I stored the log file into
Paul Lenz wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:23:52 +0300:
PS. Sorry for multiple postings, I only saved my message during
editing, but it seems to be sent every time
BTW, it looks like you are using an outdated version of your mail client,
upgrade!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your
Thomas Raef wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:19:43 -0500:
a dnsbl is the way to go.
On first look I disagree. We already have SURBL and URIBL. I don't see how
this would add any benefit on top of that. We are talking about URI's in
mail, not about hostnames of mailservers or email adresses. The
Loren Wilton writes:
Ok. Sounds like they removed some base rules we were depending on. Maybe
time to remove those rules based on them, or recreate the base rules as our
own.
Feel free to recreate them; 3.2.x will efficiently merge duplicates
anyway so it won't have any runtime effect.
But I send them to people who are building public blocklists. I've
expanded my delivery system so I can keep up with the load. If anyone
out there is running a public black lists and wants a free feed contact
me privately and I'll set it up.
I have 2 main feeds. One is mostly messages
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:31:15 +0200:
SA is all about storing
SA is all about *scoring*
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Yes you are correct. I got so focused on the improper identification of
fast-flux that I lost sight of the details.
I stand, maybe not corrected, but at least with a broader understanding of the
real issue.
There must be some way of better identifying these domains in a URI.
Thank you for
Quoting Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Raef wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 06:19:43 -0500:
a dnsbl is the way to go.
On first look I disagree. We already have SURBL and URIBL. I don't see how
this would add any benefit on top of that. We are talking about URI's in
mail, not about
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Paul Lenz wrote:
After chmod 777 the logfile,
Bad practice. Bad practice. Please don't develop the habit of
reflexively chmod 777ing things. I dealt with that from my firm's
support department for five years and I still have the twitch.
(1) It completely turns off
John D. Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After chmod 777 the logfile,
Bad practice.
I know. I did this only to make the logfile working
for a short time. Since I know that my plugin works,
I deleted the logfile.
Paul Lenz
[ repost: obfusicating domains to avoid the apache.org SMTP filter... ]
Hi John,
John Rudd wrote:
I'm a prophet now!?
:-)
Hm. So, I'm sure I can figure this out eventually, but does anyone know
the right Net::DNS way to extract the TTL?
I could probably set it up as a value in
I want to be able to make SA rotate DNS servers.
Apparently that is a limitation of Net::DNS. There was some
discussion of it on-list a few weeks back; I don't clearly remember the
details.
You might want check the current status of Net::DNS w/r/t fallback,
rotation, etc., and work
I want to be able to make SA rotate DNS servers.
Apparently that is a limitation of Net::DNS. There was some
discussion of it on-list a few weeks back; I don't clearly remember the
details.
You might want check the current status of Net::DNS w/r/t fallback,
rotation, etc., and work with
I was wondering how to modify Lorens rule for the follwing type of emails
which I have been getting a lot of:
In the subject I get: some word[s]-userid or some word[s]-some
word[s]-userid
Loren answered that a month ago. Is in the archives. You may use:
header RULE_NAME ALL =~ /\nTo:
I was wondering how to modify Lorens rule for the follwing type of emails
which I have been getting a lot of:
In the subject I get: some word[s]-userid or some word[s]-some
word[s]-userid
Loren answered that a month ago. Is in the archives. You may use:
header RULE_NAME ALL =~
I was wondering how to modify Lorens rule for the follwing type of emails
which I have been getting a lot of:
In the subject I get: some word[s]-userid or some word[s]-some
word[s]-userid
You aren't too specific about the subject form, and you aren't specific
about the To: form. That leaves
On Sunday 12 August 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:43:38 -0400:
1: sa-update is NOT pulling new PDFInfo.pm or pdfinfo.cf files even when
they are available.
of course not!
And why not? They've been announced as available, so one would assume a
simple run
hi,everyone!
I want use rewrite_header To rewrite the spam mail rcpt to: address
to one accont named [EMAIL PROTECTED], I know there's private problem,
but the mail box is for business use only, the user ask
administrator(me) to pick up normal mail from spam mark mails, I really
hate this work
At 08:19 PM 8/12/2007, lynk wrote:
I'm totally confused re this spamassassin thingy... i can't seem to get MS
outlook to read the email i received (spam/ham) after spamassassin(3.1.9)
scanned the message.
You posted this 2 days ago. If no one answers again, I have two suggestions:
First
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:52:28 -0700, Evan Platt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:19 PM 8/12/2007, lynk wrote:
I'm totally confused re this spamassassin thingy... i can't seem to get MS
outlook to read the email i received (spam/ham) after spamassassin(3.1.9)
scanned the message.
You posted this 2
29 matches
Mail list logo
