[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on 10/18/2007 11:01 PM -0800:
Check your $HOME for an ever growing ~/razor-agent.log apparently
brought in by sa-update two days ago, which will one day fill your
disk, according to a web search.
How to tell it that just like the other 99% of
This seems quite old, does anyone find it useful? I'm running 3.2.3
Thanks
A Thew
Hello Steve,
when I subscribed to this Mailinglist I have gotten a CONFIRMATION
message and a WELCOME message which told me HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE.
I do not know the exact text of the WELCOME message, but AFAIK there
was written, YOU SHOULD SAVE THE MESSAGE FOR FURTHER USE/INFOS.
Thanks, Greetings
Yoda Woda wrote:
Here my scenario: I have postfix and spamassassin installed in a
gateway machine. Postfix accepts incoming messages, pipes them to
spamassassin for scoring, which then pipes them back to postfix to be
relayed to another machine. This work fine for us
What I am
Justin Kim wrote:
I don't know what is causing my postfix server to defer messages couple of
times daily.
By looking at the logs, I can only tell there is something that keeps one
spam checking process running for 5~10 mins.
Likely bayes auto expiry. Disable bayes_auto_expiry and do the
Hi Justin,
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:09 -0700, Justin Kim wrote:
Hi All,
I need a help.
I don't know what is causing my postfix server to defer messages couple of
times daily.
When postfix server is deferring messages, our users does not get the email
delivery until the deferring action is
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat says
zh - Chinese (both Traditional and Simplified)
zh.big5 - Chinese (Traditional only)
zh.gb2312 - Chinese (Simplified only)
I want to block zh.gb2312. OK, I should use
ok_languages en zh.big5
but what about UTF-8 etc. zh messages? I don't want to
YMGT wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am sending two emails from the same system. One of these emails is giving
me extra spam penalty scores for failed reverse DNS tests. The header of
that email is:
I have no idea what these REVDNS_* rules come from. can you grep your
config files to find them?
TVD In short, add the following to your ~/.razor/razor-agent.conf file:
TVD debuglevel = 0
OK, I did mkdir .razor echo debuglevel=0 .razor/razor-agent.conf
That was at 7:56. Now the activity has shifted to that new directory:
$ ls -ogt .razor
-rw--- 1 854 2007-10-20 09:01
Hi All,
I need a help.
I don't know what is causing my postfix server to defer messages couple of
times daily.
When postfix server is deferring messages, our users does not get the email
delivery until the deferring action is done.
It usually takes 5 mins to 10 mins.
I was looking at the maillog.
* Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071019 14:59]:
Justin Kim wrote:
I don't know what is causing my postfix server to defer messages couple of
times daily.
By looking at the logs, I can only tell there is something that keeps one
spam checking process running for 5~10 mins.
Likely
-Original Message-
From: Rob Sterenborg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 22:48
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Anyway, the Faculty I work for tries to keep the e-mail system
On 10/19/07, David B Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/19/07, Yoda Woda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here my scenario: I have postfix and spamassassin installed in a gateway
machine. Postfix accepts incoming messages, pipes them to spamassassin
David B Funk wrote:
Using sendmail and a milter it is easily possible to do a proper
reject (571) at incoming SMTP time. How can this be properly done
using postfix?
You can do pre-queue filtering with postfix - whether you'll want to do
so depends on your inbound transaction rate.
/Per
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/19/07, Yoda Woda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here my scenario: I have postfix and spamassassin installed in a gateway
machine. Postfix accepts incoming messages, pipes them to spamassassin for
scoring, which then pipes them back to postfix to be
ram wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:55 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
ram wrote:
spf: relayed through one or more trusted relays, cannot use header-based
Envelope-From, skipping
[31516] dbg: spf: def_spf_whitelist_from: could not find useable
envelope sender
Enable
Steve Ingraham wrote:
Too often I get responses to a question that do not help me to
understand what is happening because they are condescending, short or
too vague for me to understand. My intent for my post was to ask those
of you who do understand these systems to be aware that many of us
SpamAssassin won't / can't reject mail. You'd need to use procmail or
another similar method.
At 07:30 AM 10/19/2007, Yoda Woda wrote:
Here my scenario: I have postfix and spamassassin installed in a
gateway machine. Postfix accepts incoming messages, pipes them to
spamassassin for scoring,
On 10/19/07, Yoda Woda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here my scenario: I have postfix and spamassassin installed in a gateway
machine. Postfix accepts incoming messages, pipes them to spamassassin for
scoring, which then pipes them back to postfix to be relayed to another
machine. This work fine
Here my scenario: I have postfix and spamassassin installed in a gateway
machine. Postfix accepts incoming messages, pipes them to spamassassin for
scoring, which then pipes them back to postfix to be relayed to another
machine. This work fine for us
What I am trying to do now is to
hi
use a filter as amavisd-new for example.
Spamassassin give a score and amavisd-new with this score reject or
accept a message
in amavisd.conf (file configuration) :
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5; (score)
$sa_kill_level_deflt = $sa_tag2_level_deflt;
$final_spam_destiny = D_DISCARD;
if
Hi, Rob,
2007/10/19, Rob Sterenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Anyway, the Faculty I work for tries to keep the e-mail system only
for research purposes, and mostly students and (sadly) technicians
tend to goof around with mail. Bandwidth isn't cheap here, so they
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 7:49 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: unsubscribed
Hello Steve,
when I subscribed to this Mailinglist I have gotten a
CONFIRMATION message and a WELCOME
I don't think the MIMEHeader plugin in 3.1.x supports :raw
checks, though. This is bug 5127, which was never backported,
as far as I can tell.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5127
--j.
Jeremy Fairbrass writes:
No, MIMEHeader works fine with 3.1.x
- Jeremy
yep, the ones I have here do. however the Storm output is mutating
daily so it'll probably change tomorrow ;)
UxBoD writes:
Thanks Justin. Do they all follow the same patterns ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
//
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:55 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
ram wrote:
Hi,
I have been using spamassassin on my MX server
( postfix + MailScanner + SA )
Now I want to run the MX on a different server and relay to the SA
server, but my SPF checks have stopped working
In
Martin.Hepworth writes:
Hmm
I'm still running 3.1.8..
I think you need 3.2.x for the MIMEHeader plugin.
--j.
Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
Hello
I have a severe problem with one of my mailservers. I'm using spamassassin
3.2.3 in combination with exim 4.66, and experience hanging spamd processes
which consume all my server resources.
I've searched these mailing lists, searched google, searched documentation,
... I found very much old
Thanks Justin. Do they all follow the same patterns ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP
For this, SA 3.2.* has its own rules for DNSWL, which you throw away
with your custom rule, since they are identically named. The built-in
rule for SA 3.2.* is:
header RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW eval:check_rbl_sub('dnswl-firsttrusted',
'127.0.\d+.1')
describe RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 02:01:25PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check your $HOME for an ever growing ~/razor-agent.log apparently
brought in by sa-update two days ago, which will one day fill your
disk, according to a web search.
sa-update doesn't impact the razor config at all. If you're
LW At that point Bayes should kick in. Now you get to the hard part.
LW You need to watch Bayes like a hawk for a few weeks to make sure you
I have always had them turned off
use_auto_whitelist 0
use_bayes 0
and seem to be doing fine.
A couple spams slip through each day out of 100.
The key to
I too have experienced strange hangs with spamc/spamd combos on my
postfix box running maildrop/mailfilter. At first I was convinced it
was my bayes DB because it was using MyISAM tables and these are slow
and I'm doing a lot of mail. So I switched to InnoDB and then I was
convinced that the
I am also having this same problem, Just noticed it starting two days ago.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spamd-hangs-at-100--cpu-tf4651889.html#a13298064
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Justin
Well it's there, just doesn't seem to work !
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2007 10:55
To: Martin.Hepworth
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter
Get the latest ruleset for SA using sa-update, this works around an issue with
whois lookups.
Only run a few RBL's - you're running them all and this will take some time.
Running a local caching nameserver on the box will help as well.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid
Hmm
I'm still running 3.1.8..
Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
1.5 HOST_EQ_NL HOST_EQ_NL
3.0 BOTNET_IPINHOSTNAMEHostname contains
Hmmm, hit okay here Martin :-
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=27.6 required=10.0 tests=BAYES_99,BOTNET,CRM114_CHECK,
HELO_DYNAMIC_CHELLO_NL,JM_STORM_MP3,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,
RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_SPACE_RATIO autolearn=unavailable
version=3.2.3
Regards,
http://www.solidstatelogic.com/mp3-spam.txt
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
-Original Message-
From: UxBoD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2007 09:01
To: Martin.Hepworth
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MP3 Spam
Can you post a copy online Martin ? need a few examples to find the common
elements.
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
Thank you for your response, Michael.
I've done your suggestions (sa-update + less RBL's), but still the same
problem. We already have a caching nameserver in the same subnet.
Some further investigation learns that it's always the same mail which
spamassassin is crashing on! But I don't have
Check your $HOME for an ever growing ~/razor-agent.log apparently
brought in by sa-update two days ago, which will one day fill your
disk, according to a web search.
How to tell it that just like the other 99% of spamassassin, logging
should be off by default? Docs not clear.
Or must one rm
Just tried this on an example we had overnight and it's didn't hit ;-(
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
-Original Message-
From: UxBoD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2007 08:45
To: Justin Mason
Cc:
On 18.10.07 17:32, Lars Ippich wrote:
Now I added IPs to trusted_networks and that causes another problem: The
trusted_network IPs are in the DNSWL and therefore get a positive bonus
from SA.
I guess that's the meaning of trusted_networks setting (or at least one of
its meanings)
Hm,
No, MIMEHeader works fine with 3.1.x
- Jeremy
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin.Hepworth writes:
Hmm
I'm still running 3.1.8..
I think you need 3.2.x for the MIMEHeader plugin.
--j.
Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0
45 matches
Mail list logo
