Re: Enevelope from does not match header from

2007-10-31 Thread Matt Kettler
ram wrote: Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not matching header from Atleast the domain part So, you want to match all messages from all mailing lists, including this one? Envelope from to From: header mismatches are *very* common, and there's RFC specified times at

RE: required_score

2007-10-31 Thread Jason Bertoch
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 PM maillist wrote: SpamAssassin version 3.2.3 running on Perl version 5.8.8 mimedefang version 2.63 sendmail Version 8.14.0 Check for either /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf or /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf Jason A. Bertoch Network Administrator

Re: Enevelope from does not match header from

2007-10-31 Thread ram
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 07:59 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: ram wrote: Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not matching header from Atleast the domain part So, you want to match all messages from all mailing lists, including this one? Envelope from to From: header

Re: Everything beying flagged positive by Bayes

2007-10-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.10.07 10:19, tad1214 wrote: Ok so I just threw a few hundred (thousand?) hams at it, we will see if that helps, here is my dump magic 0.000 0 110832 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 11160 0 non-token data: nham still not enough I'd say...

Re: High Qmail-Server Load

2007-10-31 Thread Matthias Haegele
Qnet .. schrieb: Hi Guys, I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam. The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB RAM. The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is the processes which take the most part of the load (invoked by

Re: High Qmail-Server Load

2007-10-31 Thread Duane Hill
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:43:44 + Qnet .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Hi Guys, I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam. The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB RAM. The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is

Re: The Bat! reanimated (suspicious Date header)

2007-10-31 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:43 PM -0700 Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in any corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that this is either a very recent thing or isn't all that universal. Did you

RE: High Qmail-Server Load

2007-10-31 Thread Robert - elists
If you need to reject unknown accounts at smtp time, go to http://qmail.jms1.net and check out validrcptto patch among other things please read site in full to make good decisions re qmail i.e. browser will not work there. - rh

Re: Enevelope from does not match header from

2007-10-31 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
ram wrote: Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not matching header from !__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH

Confirm configuration settings

2007-10-31 Thread Joey
Hello All, After my post Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to filter I decided to kind of clean up my configuration and also get rid of RulesDeJour. I now have configured sa-update with the following: Cron updates daily with the following: /usr/bin/sa-update

Re: What to do with backscatter?

2007-10-31 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
One thing that does plague me however is a periodic rash of Non Delivery Receipt messages (I've just had one now - about 10-15 or so). These score anywhere between 1.2 and 11.1 but mainly around the 3.7 mark (below my spam threshold of 5.0). They all hit the ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE rule. $ grep