ram wrote:
Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not
matching header from
Atleast the domain part
So, you want to match all messages from all mailing lists, including
this one? Envelope from to From: header mismatches are *very* common,
and there's RFC specified times at
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 PM maillist wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
Check for either /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf or
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 07:59 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
ram wrote:
Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not
matching header from
Atleast the domain part
So, you want to match all messages from all mailing lists, including
this one? Envelope from to From: header
On 29.10.07 10:19, tad1214 wrote:
Ok so I just threw a few hundred (thousand?) hams at it, we will see if that
helps, here is my dump magic
0.000 0 110832 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 11160 0 non-token data: nham
still not enough I'd say...
Qnet .. schrieb:
Hi Guys,
I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam.
The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB RAM.
The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is the processes
which take the most part of the load
(invoked by
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:43:44 +
Qnet .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi Guys,
I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam.
The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB
RAM.
The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is
--On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:43 PM -0700 Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in
any corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that this is
either a very recent thing or isn't all that universal.
Did you
If you need to reject unknown accounts at smtp time, go to
http://qmail.jms1.net
and check out validrcptto patch among other things
please read site in full to make good decisions re qmail
i.e. browser will not work there.
- rh
ram wrote:
Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not
matching header from
!__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH
Hello All,
After my post Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to filter
I decided to kind of clean up my configuration and also get rid of
RulesDeJour.
I now have configured sa-update with the following:
Cron updates daily with the following:
/usr/bin/sa-update
One thing that does plague me however is a periodic rash of Non
Delivery Receipt messages (I've just had one now - about 10-15 or so).
These score anywhere between 1.2 and 11.1 but mainly around the 3.7
mark (below my spam threshold of 5.0). They all hit the
ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE rule.
$ grep
11 matches
Mail list logo