John D. Hardin writes:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Is it safe to use unbounded quantifiers like + and {2,} in uri
rules? I avoid them in regular body rules.
Probably. URIs are parsed out of the body, so they are going to be
fairly limited in length.
'course, if
If I'm not mistaken it doesn't show non standard headers and also
doesn't appear to allow the viewing of mime attachments. So it's quite
difficult to see exactly what the spam assassin headers/report look
like from an iphone's native mail client.
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 22:56 -0500, Ben Lentz wrote:
but this URI redirection stuff isn't very friendly
when used by a spammer.
Ben, the key is the btnI param, which maps to the I'm feeling lucky
button.
This technique appeared last summer (I deployed my non-SA-based rule on
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, UxBoD wrote:
Hi,
I got this SPAM through this morning and it didn't trip on anything. Any ideas
?
Looks like the sender address was NULL and maybe you don't filter that?
Justin.
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
Hi @ll,
does anyone know some more recent
spamassasin plugins for editing local
users_pref ( not sql!!! )
i ve tested spamassassin SpamFilter (Frontend) version 2
and
SpamAssassin Configuration
but both did not work like they should ( lots of php problems )
Why does spam continually get a hit on this rule? I noticed a lot more
spam coming in off the upgrade to 3.2.4. Are spammers getting crafty with
their mail messages to appear as coming from myself TO myself? I could
always reduce the adjustment that USER_IN_WHITELIST makes. However, I'd like
to
Hi,
I got this SPAM through this morning and it didn't trip on anything. Any ideas
?
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Sent: 11 January 2008 09:01:06 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: ATM Master CARD
Hi @ll,
does anyone know some more recent
spamassasin plugins for editing local
users_pref ( not sql!!! )
i ve tested spamassassin SpamFilter (Frontend) version 2
and
SpamAssassin Configuration
but both did not work like they should ( lots of php problems )
specially spamassassin SpamFilter
Hello all,
I'm so no nearer a solution to this...
To recap:
Since upgrading from SA 3.2.2 to SA 3.2.3 I have had no Botnet hits at all.
I have checked with SA --lint -D and Botnet v.0.8 seem to be installed
correctly.
I have run an old message through my current setup that hit Botnet when
I am running it with SA 3.2.4 with no problems at all.
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP
I am running Botnet 0.8 with SA 3.2.3 without issue. Try a fresh install of
all Botnet files.
-Original Message-
From: UxBoD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:45 AM
To: Arthur Dent
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: BOTNET 0.8 + SA 3.2.3
I am
Am 2008-01-08 10:12:28, schrieb Joseph Brennan:
I don't understand how refusing after MAIL could take 6 times as much
resources as accepting the message. By refusing, you don't receive
the message body and you don't have to output the message to a mailer.
That has to use less resources than
Hello List,
As an editor for the german Linux Magazine I am looking for an author who
would want to write articles for our Linux Technical Review 07 Spam about
solutions, possibilities and the current state-of-the-art of spamassassin,
rules updates (rules du jour, sare,...) and its affiliated
Matthew Goodman wrote:
Why does spam continually get a “hit” on this rule? I noticed a lot
more spam coming in off the upgrade to 3.2.4. Are spammers getting
crafty with their mail messages to appear as coming from myself TO
myself? I could always reduce the adjustment that USER_IN_WHITELIST
Real headers please.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
--On Friday, January 11, 2008 9:41 + UxBoD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this SPAM through this morning and it didn't trip on anything. Any
ideas ?
Pascal,
it seems that since my upgrade to spamassassin 3.2.4, the DKIM an
DomainKeys verifiers are no more used.
All I see in the debug test are the following line :
# spamassassin -D testmail.txt | grep -i dkim
[4163] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM from @INC
hello
it seems that since my upgrade to spamassassin 3.2.4, the DKIM an
DomainKeys verifiers are no more used.
All I see in the debug test are the following line :
# spamassassin -D testmail.txt | grep -i dkim
[4163] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM from @INC
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:49:19AM -0500, Dave Koontz wrote:
I am running Botnet 0.8 with SA 3.2.3 without issue. Try a fresh install of
all Botnet files.
Well I have only recently upgraded my OS from FC6 to F8 (and that's what
prompted me to check that everything was working properly).
Maybe just timed out?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:00 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
Pascal,
it seems that since my upgrade to spamassassin 3.2.4, the DKIM an
DomainKeys verifiers are no more used.
My 3.2.4 installation is working fine using Mail::DKIM version 0.29-4
Jan 11 11:20:35 sa amavis[14033]: (14033-16)
3.2.3 worked fine, but after upgrading to 3.2.4 (via cpan) no test seem to work
and generate points. All messages get thru.
Only header that SA adds is
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on myservername
I have two servers, and the problem is now on the second of them. When
On Friday 11 January 2008, McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 15:52 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 11 January 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:34:29PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hope this helps.
It doesn't Theo.
Copy/paste from the shell I was using:
On Friday 11 January 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:34:29PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Is there a fix in the works for those who use sa-update other than
disabling it in our crontabs?
You'd want to be more specific about what your problem is. If the issue
is the
New upgrade is running GREAT here :)
Running fine here on Windows Server 2003 with CommuniGate Pro. :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:34:29PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Is there a fix in the works for those who use sa-update other than disabling
it in our crontabs?
You'd want to be more specific about what your problem is. If the issue
is the cross-certify problem for the updates.spamassassin.org
Gene Heskett wrote:
Even though I have followed the intructions in the error message twice now, I
still have the same error when sa-update is run:
Did you also follow the instructions for the channel you are
trying to update? They are available at
http://saupdates.openprotect.com/.
#
Is there a fix in the works for those who use sa-update other than disabling
it in our crontabs?
Thanks.
--
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Never put off until tomorrow what
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 15:52 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 11 January 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:34:29PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hope this helps.
It doesn't Theo.
Copy/paste from the shell I was using:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now it works without
error, but doesn't report that anything was updated
Sounds like it's working then. You can check the exit code to see
if there was an update (it's in the man page).
/usr/bin/sa-update --allowplugins --gpgkey
D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10 --channel
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# wget http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/GPG.KEY
--14:33:42-- http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/GPG.KEY
= `GPG.KEY.1'
Resolving spamassassin.apache.org... 140.211.11.130
Connecting to
(Please keep it on the list...)
Gene Heskett wrote:
Did you also follow the instructions for the channel you are
trying to update? They are available at
http://saupdates.openprotect.com/.
First time anybody has mentioned that in about 6 months,
Maybe it is, but in that case it was
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 15:52 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# wget http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/GPG.KEY
--14:33:42-- http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/GPG.KEY
= `GPG.KEY.1'
[...]
14:33:43 (53.32 KB/s) - `GPG.KEY.1' saved [3304/3304]
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:56:03PM +, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:49:19AM -0500, Dave Koontz wrote:
I am running Botnet 0.8 with SA 3.2.3 without issue. Try a fresh install of
all Botnet files.
Well I have only recently upgraded my OS from FC6 to F8 (and
I just found my MSDN renewal in my spam folder, and rightly so. It has all
kinds of spam-sign in it. I'm pasting the offending headers below.
Apparently these are being sent from some non-MS server with a long
delivery delay, all-HTML. Any comments?
(My company name replaced with mycompany.)
Nope sorry...
Here's what I did:
I removed the botnet files from /etc/mail/spamassassin and restarted
spamd.
I ran --lint which confirmed that no there was no botnet installation.
I downloaded Botnet 0.8 *again* from
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/Botnet-0.8.tar
I untarred
Arthur Dent wrote:
Nope sorry..
Please confirm... that your botnet.pm file is where your other plugin PM
modules reside. And that the botnet.cf file is where your custom rules
live (may be a different path depending on configuration). Make sure
the botnet.cf is in the same directory as
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:52:34PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hope this helps.
It doesn't Theo.
Copy/paste from the shell I was using:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/bin/sa-update --allowplugins --gpgkey
D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10 --channel saupdates.openprotect.com
error: GPG
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:13:58PM +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
If anyone can get any constructive ideas from it, I would be ethernally
greatful!
When you use third party rule updates, you need to also use the SA rule
updates if you want those rules. ie: run just sa-update or specify
Hi,
I updated from spamassassin 3.2.3 to 3.2.4 and I'm still getting
these question marks in score from spamassassin.
Here is a sample of the header I get with this message:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 23882 invoked by uid 501); 11 Jan 2008
On Friday 11 January 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:52:34PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hope this helps.
It doesn't Theo.
Copy/paste from the shell I was using:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/bin/sa-update --allowplugins --gpgkey
D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10
When you use third party rule updates, you need to also use the SA rule
updates if you want those rules. ie: run just sa-update or specify multiple
channels appropriately.
I use sa-update, and multiple channels.
My /etc/cron.daily/sa-update:
Top post, sorry!
Now it works. I just ran sa-update; sa-compile without that channel-file!
Puzzled, but works anyway.
When you use third party rule updates, you need to also
use the SA rule
updates if you want those rules. ie: run just
sa-update or specify multiple
channels
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:56:57 +0200
Jari Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
My /etc/spamassassin/channels.txt:
--(8)--
On Friday 11 January 2008 6:20 pm, Dave Koontz wrote:
Arthur Dent wrote:
Nope sorry..
Please confirm... that your botnet.pm file is where your other plugin PM
modules reside. And that the botnet.cf file is where your custom rules
live (may be a different path depending on configuration).
fchan wrote:
Hi,
I updated from spamassassin 3.2.3 to 3.2.4 and I'm still getting these
question marks in score from spamassassin.
Here is a sample of the header I get with this message:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 23882 invoked by uid 501);
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:56:57 +0200
Jari Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
My /etc/spamassassin/channels.txt:
I am also having this error in my spamd.log file.
Spamd is being run with:
SPAMD_OPTS=-c -d -v -m 40 -s local4 -q -u vpopmail
--virtual-config-dir=/var/vpopmail/domains/%d/%l/.spamassassin/ -H
/var/vpopmail
And spamc is being called by qmail-scanner-2.01 with /usr/bin/spamc -t 30
NONE of my
47 matches
Mail list logo
