Theo Van Dinter writes:
Yes and no. There aren't many negative scored rules, which could easily be
put into a low priority to run first.
The issue, which is where Matt was going I believe, is that the reason score
based short circuiting was removed is that it's horribly slow to keep
I had read about the whois plugin into SA. But I cant seem to find it
now Can someone tell me how do I install this
I beleive that could be a very effective idea to score on domain names
who have bad registrars
Every hour hundreds of domains get registered purely for the purpose of
spamming.
Quoting ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had read about the whois plugin into SA. But I cant seem to find it
now Can someone tell me how do I install this
I beleive that could be a very effective idea to score on domain names
who have bad registrars
Every hour hundreds of domains get registered
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 04:51 -0600, Jeff Chan wrote:
Quoting ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had read about the whois plugin into SA. But I cant seem to find it
now Can someone tell me how do I install this
I beleive that could be a very effective idea to score on domain names
who have bad
ram wrote:
I hope this would change. Whois information must be standardized and
must be available for automated queries
whois.rfc-ignorant.org lists at least 165 top-level domains that have no
whois server or provides incomplete data. This includes TLDs such
as .dk, .de and .eu.
/Per
-Original Message-
From: ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:47 AM
I had read about the whois plugin into SA. But I cant seem to find it
now Can someone tell me how do I install this
You can get a copy of the uriwhois plugin at:
-Original Message-
From: Giampaolo Tomassoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 1:38 PM
...omissis...
In my own case, I see that the traffic of my MX servers is so low that
no
registrar banned my queries...
However, most gTLD registries don't run a
How install spamassassin with vhcs2? I search in google but I found
anything.
Robert - elists wrote:
You can't run the rules in score-order without driving SA's performance
into the ground.
The key here is SA doesn't run tests sequentially, it runs them in
parallel as it works its way through the body. this allows for good,
efficient use of memory cache.
By running
Matt Kettler wrote:
No, I'm saying it breaks the emails into pieces, then for the first
piece, it runs all the rules. Then it runs all the rules on the second
piece, and the third, and the fourth, etc.
Forcing score order causes it to run the whole message on one rule,
then then whole
From: ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 2008, January 19 03:14
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 04:51 -0600, Jeff Chan wrote:
Quoting ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had read about the whois plugin into SA. But I cant seem to find it
now Can someone tell me how do I install this
I beleive that could be
Well, it looks like I need to spend some time reading the code to study
exactly how SA runs rules, and see if it's doing something that pollutes
the memory cache, which would cause the over-sorting to not matter..
As best I recall, it runs rules by type, and sorted by priority within type.
12 matches
Mail list logo
