Hi Mous,
mouss wrote:
giga328 wrote:
Hi Anthony,
I will ask people from MailScanner also but for my email system is not
possible to use MailScanner directly so I'm using spamd. My question is
about lowering chances for false positives by having safe list from
MailScanner. But since I just
Thank you Jeff and Anthony.
If I'm right, there is big possibility for SpamAssassin to mark as spam some
email from for example doubleclick or other companies if there is
personalized URL in it because it can look like spam or even like phishing.
If I'm protecting only my mailbox it will be ok to
Quoting giga328 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you Jeff and Anthony.
If I'm right, there is big possibility for SpamAssassin to mark as spam some
email from for example doubleclick or other companies if there is
personalized URL in it because it can look like spam or even like phishing.
If I'm
Thank you, as always, you have been !extremely helpful.
So, your proposal is to block all email from all modern outlook clients.
Brilliant plan. No, I don't worship MS, but I live in reality.
We should just block anything with the Thread header, X-Mailers with Outlook
in it, any outlook/
Perhaps this information is useful for someone who suddenly
experiences long running bayes expiration in combination with MySQL
bayes storage.
Management summmary: :-)
Run an optimize table tablename on your Innodb Mysql SpamAssassin
tables, if you suddenly experience long bayes expiry
Here's my report about treating the output from:
spamassassin --mbox alltests.txt scanned.mbox
as an mbox file.
In summary
--
If you use SA to process a multi-message file with the --mbox option the
output is an acceptable mbox file.
Detail
--
After passing my standard regression
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Thank you, as always, you have been !extremely helpful.
why attack me?
So, your proposal is to block all email from all modern outlook clients.
Brilliant plan. No, I don't worship MS, but I live in reality.
sorry, I'm not as brilliant as you are.
We should
I've installed SpamAssassin (3.2.4), including DB_File to use the Bayesian
filters..If I execute spamassassin directly from the command line, it
executes as expected and uses the bayes filters:
% spamassasin -D bayes spammsg2.txt
[6868] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:55:22PM -0800, jeff986 wrote:
It must be something about procmail, but.. I officially have no clue.
Comments?Ideas? Thanks.
You don't happen to have PERL5LIB or PERLLIB in your environment, do you?
Where is DB_File installed, and what's the output of perl
I'm not using the environment variables. Should I be?
% perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 10 subversion 0) configuration:
Platform:
osname=solaris, osvers=2.7, archname=sun4-solaris
uname='sunos ultra 5.7 generic_106541-25 sun4u sparc sunw,ultra-2 '
Starting this afternoon I'm getting a raft of spams from Hotmail
advertising meds at throwaway Blogspot subdomains. Both have been
advised.
Here's a point added for such:
describe BLOGSPOT_01 Throwaway blogspot domain
uri BLOGSPOT_01 m;https?://[a-z]{8,}\d{5,}\.blogspot\.com/$;
It does
11 matches
Mail list logo
