A weird thing has started within the last couple of days. It is only
affecting mail received from the SA users mail list and only to mail
received from Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The messages have a To header like this:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Users
Martin Gregorie wrote:
A weird thing has started within the last couple of days. It is only
affecting mail received from the SA users mail list and only to mail
received from Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The messages have a To header like this:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Saturday 09 February 2008, jdow wrote:
From: John Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 21:03
Gene Heskett sez:
running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
There's no fool like an old fool.
I'm close enough to Gene's age and have known him long
Martin Gregorie wrote:
A weird thing has started within the last couple of days. It is only
affecting mail received from the SA users mail list and only to mail
received from Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The messages have a To header like this:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
KB No, you are not. Please note that these are version numbers, not floats.
KB With respect to minor versions, 24 is massively larger than 2...
It's all a usability (http://www.useit.com/alertbox/) problem. You
might say SpamAssassin is usability exempt, as it is only for computer
pros. But I'm
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008, jdow wrote:
From: John Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 21:03
Gene Heskett sez:
running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
There's no fool like an old fool.
I'm
Hello,
This sample message that I got had no link in the
message but I got the same ? for the spam score
also. It appears some message with links or
without links I get that ? score. However it
appears after investigating the most of them have
links.
Thank you,
Frank
Return-Path: [EMAIL
