hi all, i think this is my 1st mail..
here's the problem i'm facing
i want to know how to setup or configure spamc in detailed
and is it related that much to configuring the procmail ??
another question
who recieves the mail from the clients as first time?? is it spamc or spamd??
Hi,
Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the
last months?
Is it still reasonable to run an orc plugin? I see the latest FuzzyORC
version is
not SA 3.2.x compatible. Are there more recent product compatible to 3.2.x?
Are you guys still running an ocr plugin on
I am getting spams on my spamtraps which are coming with
HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI
Where do I report these
---
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from omxp01.mx.ning.com (omxp01.mx.ning.com [208.82.16.109])
by
mx1.netcore.co.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B901DE4AF for
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:06:02PM -0700, Ibrahim Hashem wrote:
hi all, i think this is my 1st mail..
here's the problem i'm facing
i want to know how to setup or configure spamc in detailed
and is it related that much to configuring the procmail ??
You don't mention your OS or
On 02.05.08 19:11, ram wrote:
I am getting spams on my spamtraps which are coming with
HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI
Where do I report these
try searching the habeas website...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising
On 01.05.08 16:06, Ibrahim Hashem wrote:
hi all, i think this is my 1st mail..
here's the problem i'm facing
i want to know how to setup or configure spamc in detailed
you don't configure spamc, you just use it.
You only configure spamassassin...
and is it related that much to
We are using the SVN version of FuzzyOCR. It seems to be working fine.
-William
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:38:41PM +0200, polloxx wrote:
Hi,
Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the
last months?
Is it still reasonable to run an orc plugin? I see the latest
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:38:41PM +0200, polloxx wrote:
Hi,
Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the
last months?
Has there been any in a year? That's when I dropped using it.
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:06:05PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:38:41PM +0200, polloxx wrote:
Hi,
Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the
last months?
Has there been any in a year? That's when I dropped using it.
It's probably not
SA-Users,
I'm running spamassassin rules 648641 for 3.2.4 fetched by sa-update.
I've run into two issues with my current setup. First, group messages
sent through my MTA (CommuniGate) are getting classified with
BOUNCE_MESSAGE by vbounce. Below is one such message.
Secondly, even if the
Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the
last months?
Right. There's close to none now. Spam techniques come and go.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University IT
Am I right to say that picture spam has dropped dramatically since the
last months?
On 02.05.08 11:38, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Right. There's close to none now. Spam techniques come and go.
does it push the extracted text back to SA so it could be used by e.g.
bayes? This is how it imho
On Friday 02 May 2008 17:24, Jesse Stroik wrote:
SA-Users,
I'm running spamassassin rules 648641 for 3.2.4 fetched by sa-update.
I've run into two issues with my current setup. First, group messages
sent through my MTA (CommuniGate) are getting classified with
BOUNCE_MESSAGE by vbounce.
Stefan,
Fantastic. This works. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
Best,
Jesse
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
On Friday 02 May 2008 17:24, Jesse Stroik wrote:
SA-Users,
I'm running spamassassin rules 648641 for 3.2.4 fetched by sa-update.
I've run into two issues with my current setup.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
does it push the extracted text back to SA so it could be used by e.g.
bayes? This is how it imho should be used.
(and imho the same for .pdf and/or .doc - extract text _and_ images from
it, call OCR for images...)
That is a question that was very frequently
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:12:12PM +0200, decoder wrote:
Also, the SA plugin architecture is not designed to modify the message
in any way, so you cannot push back the text into the normal processing
line.
Really? Who says? I made very specific modifications in 3.2 to allow for
just that.
On May 1, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Anyway, just thought you ought to know about the high volume thing.
You
might get your end running sweet and fast, but it may cause rejected
lookups when you're scanning mail.
I'm pretty much putting Pyzor on the back burner for now.
DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
I found a possible reason for such a low hit rate with 3.2.4,
uridnsbl_skip_domain. Holy smokes it has been killing me.
We routinely get thousands of spam with URIs from geocities, mail.ru,
blogspot, yahoo.com.br, netzero and more. I have had custom rules to
score
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:12:12PM +0200, decoder wrote:
Also, the SA plugin architecture is not designed to modify the message
in any way, so you cannot push back the text into the normal processing
line.
Really? Who says? I made very specific modifications
When already running Spamassassin with Razor how much would adding
Pyzor and DCC to the mix help?
Matt
Hello,
Recently, on 4/30/2008, Perl update 5.8.8-39 for Fedora was released which
addresses the following:
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2008-1927
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1927 to the following
vulnerability: Double
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Todd N wrote:
Double free vulnerability in Perl 5.8.8 allows context-dependent
attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and crash)
via a crafted regular expression containing UTF8 characters.
We are using Spamassassin 3.1.1. It is urgent that I find
http://RMAILinEmacs.blogspot.com
23 matches
Mail list logo
