Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rob McEwen wrote:
(on-list follow-up)
By "proactive listings", I discovered in my off-list conversation with
Dallas that this refers to URIBL-Gold listings... where items are
listed in "uribl-gold" in advance of seeing them in actual spams. But
this uribl-gold list isn
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
I'm not repeating for the 5th time that there are no trusted
mailservers. Only this host.
That's a contradiction, because "this host" is a mailserver. Clearly
you have a trusted mailserver.
However, in the interest of moving the
On Sun, May 4, 2008 01:55, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
> I think you got it wrong this 201.11.150.2 is my customer,
> which really is in a DSL dynamic ip address line. This is NOT my mail
> server. My mail server is on a static ip address which has no problem at
> all with RBLs.
does
Nigel Frankcom escreveu:
On Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:32 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Guys,
im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
application.
Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
becau
On 02.05.08 17:13, Matt wrote:
> When already running Spamassassin with Razor how much would adding
> Pyzor and DCC to the mix help?
DCC adds much. Pyzor helps a bit too, however is not so effective. I
recommend turning on both
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk
On Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:32 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hello Guys,
>
>im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
>application.
>
>Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
>because of RBL checks, for
Hello Guys,
im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
application.
Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
because of RBL checks, for example:
Content analysis details: (8.4 points, 8.0 required)
pts rule name descript
Dear spamassassin users,
we are using spamassassin on a site-wide basis. It is invoked via a
script from postfix and is simply called by "spamassassin -e -x".
Suprisingly, when executing it by a user named filter and executing it
by root, different tests are executed (See below). Why could t
