Re: HELP!! spamasssin killing my server

2008-06-11 Thread Matthias Leisi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [sent only to the original poster by accident - reply-to considered needs brain ;) ] | [skipped the debug output] A couple of notes: 1) This advice: | Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not | configured; it is

RE: HELP!! spamasssin killing my server

2008-06-11 Thread Bowie Bailey
Matthias Leisi wrote: A couple of notes: 1) This advice: Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks manually should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce the

Re: how to keep updated against german spam?

2008-06-11 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 10. Juni 2008 peter pilsl wrote: I just uploaded three different examples of recent spamwave to my webpage: http://www.goldfisch.at/goldfisch/temp/spam1 As others said already, with simple network tests you could filter that mails. Consider using the BOTNET tool, that helps too.

Re: WrongMX plugin

2008-06-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, On 30.05.08 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I'd like to use WrongMX plugin on our mailservers (I found it very good idea and I was explicitly searching for it), but I'd like to ask a few questions, if someone of you uses it: - did you modify score of it? - did you modify the

VBOUNCE FP when whitelist_bounce_relays matches

2008-06-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, I noticed when having whitelist_bounce_relays mailhub?.nextra.sk smail2.tnce.sk *.fw.nextra.sk some messages are still marked as BOUNCE, even when received by matching host: SA headers: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on t02.nx X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No,

Re: HELP!! spamasssin killing my server

2008-06-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11.06.08 09:07, Matthias Leisi wrote: [sent only to the original poster by accident - reply-to considered needs brain ;) ] your MUA needs brain, pardon, List-Reply function... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail

Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-11 Thread Linda Walsh
Matthias Leisi wrote: 1) This advice: | Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not | configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks manually should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce the number of DNS lookups and can avoid

Re: Discussion side point: levels of Trust

2008-06-11 Thread SM
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote: How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be useful to assign a probability to Trust at the least. I mean do I put my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partnering with It could be a reputation system where you

trusted_networks

2008-06-11 Thread Chris
If I do not control any mail servers is it necessary for the trusted networks line to be set in my local.cf? If so, what addresses would I enter there? I'm asking this because of this line in the Wiki: Generally you want trusted_networks set to contain all the mailservers you control that add

Re: trusted_networks

2008-06-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris wrote: If I do not control any mail servers is it necessary for the trusted networks line to be set in my local.cf? In most cases you want to trust all the mailservers the MX back. If you don't control any mailservers at all, then you would substitute to trusting your ISPs mailsers.