Hello, all.
Here's the current situation with what I was concerned was a memory
leak. Since the Network Settings DNS was changed to the named process
on the same machine as the CG Pro mail server some 36 hours ago, and
the spamd settings were changed to
spamd -d -x -q -u nobody -x -m 4
From: Ron Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 06:16
My results for time spamc (test email):
real 0m0.354s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.005s
My results for time spamassassin (test email):
real 0m5.310s
user 0m1.969s
sys 0m0.521s
I clearly see slowdowns in spam on the weekend so
What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's
quite common now?
I usually don't use BAYES
Things like
*Man killed by flying cocktail glass*
*A-rod dropped from team*
*Obama withdraws support for Israel*
On Sunday 27 July 2008 17:43:44 Robert Nicholson wrote:
What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's
quite common now?
nothing. see my previous post ( 0 Points)
I usually don't use BAYES
doesn't help anyway.
Things like
*Man killed by flying cocktail
What have people been using to curtail some of the new
disaster spam that's quite common now?
I usually don't use BAYES
Things like
Man killed by flying cocktail glass
A-rod dropped from team
Obama withdraws support for Israel
Content preview: McCain suffers sudden
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Robert Nicholson wrote:
What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's
quite common now?
I usually don't use BAYES
Things like
*Man killed by flying cocktail glass*
*A-rod dropped from team*
*Obama withdraws support for Israel*
That's
From: Arvid Ephraim Picciani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 08:53
On Sunday 27 July 2008 17:43:44 Robert Nicholson wrote:
What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam
that's
quite common now?
nothing. see my previous post ( 0 Points)
I usually don't
From: Jari Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 09:03
What have people been using to curtail some of the new
disaster spam that's quite common now?
I usually don't use BAYES
Things like
Man killed by flying cocktail glass
A-rod dropped from team
Obama withdraws
On 7/27/08 at 8:28 AM -0700 jdow wrote:
These are important results. They show that you have a plenty fast
enough machine for 100,000 emails per day, although given the fact
that daytime is pretty bad compared to night time you'd probably see
significant slowdowns in throughput during the day as
From: Larry Nedry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 2008, July 27 12:02
On 7/27/08 at 8:28 AM -0700 jdow wrote:
These are important results. They show that you have a plenty fast
enough machine for 100,000 emails per day, although given the fact
that daytime is pretty bad compared to night time
Greetings! New to the list so bear with me...
I have been running SA on Exchange 2003 for quite some time and recently
updated to 3.2.5. One thing I have noticed is sa-update doesn't actually
seem to be making a connection; as it had always done in the past. Our
company's firewall logs EVERY
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:19:19PM -0500, Shawn Berg wrote:
company's firewall logs EVERY outgoing connection and when I run
sa-update from the command prompt, no connection is established
anywhere. Previously, I could see the connection being logged.
Any troubleshooting help on this would
12 matches
Mail list logo
