At 23:01 30-11-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
So then, you're saying the behavior for ipv4 and ipv6 is somehow different?
If you start spamd without specifying the IP addresses to listen on,
spamd will listen on the 127.0.0.1 IP address only.
You should have the IO::Socket::INET6
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, SM wrote:
At 23:01 30-11-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
So then, you're saying the behavior for ipv4 and ipv6 is somehow different?
If you start spamd without specifying the IP addresses to listen on, spamd
will listen on the 127.0.0.1 IP address only.
And on
Think twice before doing this -- just like a computer cannot interpret
the intent of a message, it cannot interpret the content of an image.
The computer is most certainly guessing, and many of the algorithms
spammers use these days to make their images unique would likely defeat it.
Karsten
Kate,
The previous discussion of the windows live spaces spam was from
10/18/2008 and it has the subject Windows Live Spaces spam. That
should help you search the archive.
I will look into the BOTNET as I don't believe we are using this at the
moment. Do you get many fp's with this?
In
I am new to administrating a server with SpamAssassin. Currently, our server
is using score set (0), and I would like for it to be (3) - Bayes + network.
I need some specific instructions on how to change this server-wide -
assistance much appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
Has anyone who switched to 1.5 of iXHash received any hits? I haven't seen any
since switching. One thing that I've noticed is if I pass the same message
thru SA using the old iXhash, the hash is computed via Method 1 and 2, if I use
1.5 of iXhash, it's only computed using method 2
On one
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 08:30:32AM -0800, jlefvendahl wrote:
I am new to administrating a server with SpamAssassin. Currently, our server
is using score set (0), and I would like for it to be (3) - Bayes + network.
I need some specific instructions on how to change this server-wide -
I noticed this morning that I also had 0 ixhash hits. Is something wrong?
Rose, Bobby wrote:
Has anyone who switched to 1.5 of iXHash received any hits? I haven't seen any
since switching. One thing that I've noticed is if I pass the same message
thru SA using the old iXhash, the hash is
Rose, Bobby wrote:
Has anyone who switched to 1.5 of iXHash received any hits? I haven't seen
any since switching. One thing that I've noticed is if I pass the same
message thru SA using the old iXhash, the hash is computed via Method 1 and
2, if I use 1.5 of iXhash, it's only computed
*Good afternoon,
I am trying to write a rule that gives negative scores to messages that
contain names of our company's and products. I have a few question
regarding this. Will the rule at the end of this message work? Can I put
line brakes in the rule? How can I go about adding an optional s
At 07:03 01-12-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
And on an ip6 enabled system, where will spamc localhost try to
connect to first? 127.0.0.1 or ::1?
By default, spamc connects to 127.0.0.1. On a properly configured
network, it will try ::1, then 127.0.0.1.
Yes, but there's no way to
Greetings,
Anyone have any issues getting Jim Mason's sought rules updated from
yerp.org? I am running SA 3.0.25 and the last successful update was Nov.
26, 2008. It looks like some bits need to be flipped on.
Here is my channel.conf file:
sought.rules.yerp.org
Here is the error from
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 13:50 -0500, Ray Jette wrote:
I am trying to write a rule that gives negative scores to messages that
contain names of our company's and products. I have a few question
regarding this. Will the rule at the end of this message work?
No. Well, it's technically (almost)
Paul Griffith wrote:
Greetings,
Anyone have any issues getting Jim Mason's sought rules updated from
yerp.org? I am running SA 3.0.25 and the last successful update was Nov.
26, 2008. It looks like some bits need to be flipped on.
Here is my channel.conf file:
sought.rules.yerp.org
Here
Ray Jette wrote:
*Good afternoon,
I am trying to write a rule that gives negative scores to messages
that contain names of our company's and products. I have a few
question regarding this. Will the rule at the end of this message
work? Can I put line brakes in the rule? How can I go about
Ray Jette wrote:
*Good afternoon,
I am trying to write a rule that gives negative scores to messages
that contain names of our company's and products. I have a few
question regarding this. Will the rule at the end of this message
work? Can I put line brakes in the rule? How can I go about
This issue, apparently, has been a problem for me for several Spamassassin
releases, but I just now figured out what may be happening. I've been
closing spamd once per hour, just to make it read new local.cf, notice
sa-update changes, etc., but occasionally my system can't start new tasks
(usually
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:42:05PM -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
How do I go about trapping this error in locker? (Specifically, how do I
figure out who Called locker, to find the code that's not closing the file
it opened?)
Has anyone else run into this sort of issue?
The last time this sort of
From: Ray Jette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 2008, December 01 12:41
Ray Jette wrote:
*Good afternoon,
I am trying to write a rule that gives negative scores to messages that
contain names of our company's and products. I have a few question
regarding this. Will the rule at the end of
jdow wrote:
From: Ray Jette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 2008, December 01 12:41
Ray Jette wrote:
*Good afternoon,
I am trying to write a rule that gives negative scores to messages
that contain names of our company's and products. I have a few
question regarding this. Will the rule at
Ray Jette schrieb:
Thanks again for the help. Following is the rule I ended up using:
body DEVISIONS_AND_PRODUCTS/\b(Air
Balance|Airtherm|Alton|American Warming|AWV|Anemostat|Applied Air|Argo
Baseboard|Arrow United|Axon Electric|Beacon Morris|Cesco
Hello.
I'm writing my custom rule
uri LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL /www\.viapaypal\.com\//
score LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL 5.0
(for add five points to e-mail contains www.viapaypal.com into body)
I've add it to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf but I can't see it with
spamassassin --lint -D (and
does spamassassin --lint give you any errors?
Joe
Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Hello.
I'm writing my custom rule
uri LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL /www\.viapaypal\.com\//
score LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL 5.0
(for add five points to e-mail contains www.viapaypal.com
http://www.viapaypal.com/ into
Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Hello.
I'm writing my custom rule
uri LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL /www\.viapaypal\.com\//
score LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL 5.0
(for add five points to e-mail contains www.viapaypal.com
http://www.viapaypal.com/ into body)
I've add it to
No, it gives me nothing.
:~# spamassassin --lint
:~#
2008/12/1 Joe Vieira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does spamassassin --lint give you any errors?
Joe
Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Hello.
I'm writing my custom rule
uri LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL /www\.viapaypal\.com\//
score LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL
Folks,
as some of you already noticed I f... up the last (1.5) release of the
iXhash plugin.
Plain simple a wrong regular expression practically disables hash #1.
I just uploaded a fixed version to ixhash.sf.net that runs the correct
RE ( on a modified version of the email's body to
Hi Jonathan,
nice to hear this.
I'm using amavisd-new also.
My local.cf is owned by root, but readable from world
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1304 Dec 1 19:00 local.cf
Do you think this is the problem?
2008/12/1 Jonathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Hello.
I'm writing
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:37:36PM +0100, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
uri LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL /www\.viapaypal\.com\//
score LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL 5.0
(for add five points to e-mail contains www.viapaypal.com
http://www.viapaypal.com/ into body)
I've add it to
It works!
I sent a mail with www.viapaypal.com in the body:
*X-Spam-Flag:* YES
*X-Spam-Score:* 13.178
*X-Spam-Level:* *
*X-Spam-Status:* Yes, score=13.178 tagged_above=undef required=6.31
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
LOCAL_URI_VIAPAYPAL=5,
Hi Dirk,
I'm not getting any hits on the new version either.
Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Folks,
as some of you already noticed I f... up the last (1.5) release of the
iXhash plugin.
Plain simple a wrong regular expression practically disables hash #1.
I just uploaded a fixed version to
30 matches
Mail list logo
