Does anyone know how to stop this menace?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Merry Christmas 2008 NOT 2o8 and Happy New Year 2009 NOT 2o9
--
This message has been scanned for viruses
On Fri, December 26, 2008 13:48, The Doctor wrote:
Does anyone know how to stop this menace?
http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/postfix_restriction_classes3_en.shtml
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
so you're basically sharding the bayes_token tables... could you open
a bug on the SpamAssassin bugzilla with this patch? thanks!
--j.
Thorsten Meinl writes:
--nextPart9059977.pG6Pp7397c
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=Boundary-01=_oj8UJ9IS8rBJw6M
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The Doctor a écrit :
Does anyone know how to stop this menace?
Post a sample to pastebin so that we see which one(s) make it to your
inbox.
if your server does not need to allow unauthenticated access to your
users, then you can configure your MTA to block such mail except from
authenticated
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt
I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?
i
On Fri, December 26, 2008 20:06, Igor Chudov wrote:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt
I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and
the same person, any way of filtering them out?
add the domain to http://uribl.com/ (you need a login there)
currently
Igor Chudov wrote:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt
I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?
The sending IP is currently blacklisted on FiveTenSig and ivmSIP/24.
Both of these are best used as scoring lists and
At 11:06 26-12-2008, Igor Chudov wrote:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt
I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?
Autolearning is categorizing that email as ham because of the zero
score. Turn off autolearning or
DNS seems to have been reporting 709395 as current for about eight weeks
HK If you want more up-to-date protection, use latest SVN (3.3). That's where
HK the development happens. It's been working fine here for a long time.
All I know is I have
$ crontab -l
33 3 * * * PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 04:31:48AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
DNS seems to have been reporting 709395 as current for about eight weeks
HK If you want more up-to-date protection, use latest SVN (3.3). That's where
HK the development happens. It's been working fine here for a long time.
m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/sa-update.sh.txt
m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/channel.conf
They give 403 Forbidden.
m those I looked at triggered JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_1. so make sure you use the
m sought channel in your sa-update.
OK, I did all the research to find what it might be that you were
talking about.
I completed the steps (some of them exposing how sa-update fails to
catch a bumbling user):
$ wget
jida...@jidanni.org a écrit :
m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/sa-update.sh.txt
m http://www.netoyen.net/sa/channel.conf
They give 403 Forbidden.
should be fixed now. sorry for the annoyance.
jida...@jidanni.org a écrit :
m those I looked at triggered JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_1. so make sure you use the
m sought channel in your sa-update.
OK, I did all the research to find what it might be that you were
talking about.
I completed the steps (some of them exposing how sa-update fails to
Igor Chudov schrieb:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt
I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?
i
perhaps you can check it whith http://www.openrbl.org and then you can
modificate your config on your mail server
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
m those I looked at triggered JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_1. so make sure you use the
m sought channel in your sa-update.
OK, I did all the research to find what it might be that you were
talking about.
I completed the steps (some of them exposing how sa-update fails to
catch a
So what's the worst thing that could happen to me with sa-update
--nogpg? Just a little more spam getting through? Ha!
If you would just follow instructions, you wouldn't need --nogpg
Yes, well, let's just say things didn't work out, and we want to use
--nogpg just for that risky feel. Like
SM wrote:
At 11:06 26-12-2008, Igor Chudov wrote:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt
I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?
Autolearning is categorizing that email as ham because of the zero
score. Turn off
HK If SVN does not ring a bell,
Oh, you mean like the example on
http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/trunk/grub2/docs/grub.texi?root=grubview=log
$ svn co svn://svn.sv.gnu.org/grub/trunk/grub2/docs/grub.texi
svn: URL 'svn://svn.sv.gnu.org/grub/trunk/grub2/docs/grub.texi' refers to a
file, not a
jida...@jidanni.org a écrit :
So what's the worst thing that could happen to me with sa-update
--nogpg? Just a little more spam getting through? Ha!
If you would just follow instructions, you wouldn't need --nogpg
Yes, well, let's just say things didn't work out, and we want to use
OK, I have just finished
$ sa-update -D --no-gpg --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
And would just like to warn other users that 'sought' rules take three
times longer:
$ time spamassassin --local -t a_typical_spam_message /dev/null
real0m14.081s
user0m13.489s
sys 0m0.588s
Up from
real
On Fri, December 26, 2008 22:44, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
So what's the worst thing that could happen, our mailbox
getting cancer?
cheers
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
The point of the GPG sig check is to verify the authenticity of the
source of the rules you're downloading. To get in the frame of mind as
to what it means to skip this, consider what it would mean to have an
unknown (obviously malicious) person masquerade as your wife/husband
for a while. What
I took a look at Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit, but what I
really want to do is if it is ham, run it through the expensive
'sought' extra tests, to see if it really is ham.
I.e., if the end result is below required_score, continue on into the
sought tests.
Probably the only way to do
24 matches
Mail list logo
