-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
i'm trying to create a package of SpamAssassin, using DESTDIR. however, the
make install step fails when DESTDIR is set:
$ gmake DESTDIR=$HOME/sa install
[...]
Writing
RobertH wrote on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:18:56 -0800:
we use other network tests so turning off rbl checks wouldnt be a good idea
right?
Sorry, don't understand what you mean.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 22:17, RobertH robe...@abbacomm.net wrote:
A general grasp of how it performs across a diverse range of
email can be gotten from the STATISTICS-set*.txt files
included in the tarball.
Look in the rules directory.
The file contains the mass-check results that were
Ned Slider wrote on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:02:19 +:
Also, I have a low scoring generic 'body' rule for common drug names
that should have hit on Dan's mail (and your reply) if SA did strip that
junk, but it obviously doesn't (at least not for me).
It will not work on these messages as they
Ned Slider wrote on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:02:19 +:
Also, I have a low scoring generic 'body' rule for common drug names
that should have hit on Dan's mail (and your reply) if SA did strip that
junk, but it obviously doesn't (at least not for me).
On 30.01.09 16:31, Kai Schaetzl
Sorry, don't understand what you mean.
Kai
recently i put a small list of RBL rulenames we have zero'd out on the list
to ask if anyone would share their experience and comments about how
effective they are in stopping spam in their large installations.
we have them zero'd out cause
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ned Slider wrote on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:02:19 +:
Also, I have a low scoring generic 'body' rule for common drug names
that should have hit on Dan's mail (and your reply) if SA did strip that
junk, but it obviously doesn't (at least not for me).
It will not work on
how is it that the country in africa so often mentioned in email scams is
not worth a point in SA default config
nor do i see it anywhere
- rh
On 30.01.09 08:22, RobertH wrote:
how is it that the country in africa so often mentioned in email scams is
not worth a point in SA default config
What do you mean? How and why should it be mentioned in the defalt config?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:22 -0800, RobertH wrote:
how is it that the country in africa so often mentioned in email scams is
not worth a point in SA default config
Because single-word rules are a bad idea.
Use JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD (part of the general Sought rule-set). Some of us
are *manually*
matus,
what i mean is how could an email with nigeria make it through SA without a
score based on the word nigeria?
- rh
On 30.01.09 08:42, RobertH wrote:
what i mean is how could an email with nigeria make it through SA without a
score based on the word nigeria?
because if they could not, I could not see this e-mail nor answer it.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I
Karsten and Matus
i hear you, yet lets get real...
and, we do use jm_sought stuff.
the word nigeria alone is worth a point is all i was saying.
guess that should be in local rules eh?
;-)
- rh
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:53 -0800, RobertH wrote:
Karsten and Matus
i hear you, yet lets get real...
and, we do use jm_sought stuff.
the word nigeria alone is worth a point is all i was saying.
No. Scoring based on single-words is pretty much the opposite of the SA
approach. That's all
On Fri, January 23, 2009 17:36, Dennis Hardy wrote:
Yes already done: http://pastebin.com/m4400a74d
why not get it listed on http://uribl.com/ ?
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
On 30.01.09 08:53, RobertH wrote:
the word nigeria alone is worth a point is all i was saying.
It was already explained by Karsten...
guess that should be in local rules eh?
if you want... yes.
But note that scoring on a single word is really a bad idea...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
RobertH wrote:
how is it that the country in africa so often mentioned in email scams is
not worth a point in SA default config
You mean the rules?
nor do i see it anywhere
You must not be looking very hard. It's there, both in the
default ruleset and in the updated ruleset, but not as a
On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
messages?
(except in this mailing list :-)
[ snip]
Report: Hi Brian, Thank you for getting this to us so quickly! We
will be sending a PO over within the next couple
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:47 -0800, Kelson kel...@speed.net wrote:
On the subject of style vs style type=text/css
*Technically* the TYPE attribute is required in HTML 4, but in practice,
no one really uses anything other than CSS, and most browsers will
assume it.
The current draft of HTML 5
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 13:12 -0500, sa-li...@techsuperpowers.com wrote:
On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
messages?
(except in this mailing list :-)
i noticed the same thing when we first started
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, January 23, 2009 17:36, Dennis Hardy wrote:
Yes already done: http://pastebin.com/m4400a74d
why not get it listed on http://uribl.com/?
Both uribl and ivmURI listed this domain back on January 23rd. But it is
unclear exactly *when* this spam sample
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:28 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, January 23, 2009 17:36, Dennis Hardy wrote:
Yes already done: http://pastebin.com/m4400a74d
why not get it listed on http://uribl.com/ ?
Benny, this is going to help how?
Dennis clearly stated a *week* ago that the domains
--On Friday, January 30, 2009 4:41 PM +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
Aren't there any MUAs that try to autodetect the right content type?
Even from microsoft?
IE had a nasty habit of ignoring the MIME type in HTTP headers and
rendering HTML even when one wanted it
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:56 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
IE had a nasty habit of ignoring the MIME type in HTTP headers and
rendering HTML even when one wanted it displayed as text/plain. So it
wouldn't surprise me if Outlook (Express) had the same annoying
helpfulness.
I've wasted more
You must not be looking very hard. It's there, both in the
default ruleset and in the updated ruleset, but not as a
single-word rule:
grep -i nigeria
/var/db/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/*
jo...@chip:~$ grep -i nigeria
No. Scoring based on single-words is pretty much the
opposite of the SA approach. That's all I was saying.
karsten,
i get the SA approach
and to the no answer, baloney
this word should get a *HIT* no mattter how small it is scored.
- rh
26 matches
Mail list logo
