Since you don't need Net::Ident for SA, I'm going to say no.
:)
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009, Bill Landry wrote:
>>Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Using cpan, trying to install Net::Ident (the other bits except razor were
>>> nominal from the same
Gene Heskett a écrit :
> On Saturday 21 February 2009, Bill Landry wrote:
>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>[snip]
>>> Warning (usually harmless): 'YAML' not installed, will not store
>>> persistent state
>>> Running make install
>>> make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
>>> Failed
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:51:29 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> Sounds like bug 5962 and it's friends.
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5962
Yeah, I read that one. The fix that was pushed for that bug however does
not include the __HOTMAIL_BAYDAV_MSGID pattern as a
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sat, February 21, 2009 19:11, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> Very well, but you're also using a RBL with a known high risk of
>> blocking nonspam email.
>>
>
> http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=verizon.net
>
> your "small" isp should really have power enou
At 01:20 22-02-2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
you dont know it either ?
The term "dynamic hostname" is used in intermediate system routing.
Regards,
-sm
On Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 10:47:00 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I'm alarmed at some of the stuff GoDaddy did, completely on their own
> without orders from ICANN. See http://www.nodaddy.com. I don't want
> the domain name registration system turned into a nanny-state tool.
It would be, if i
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On Sat, February 21, 2009 19:11, Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Very well, but you're also using a RBL with a known high risk of
>> blocking nonspam email.
>
> http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=verizon.net
>
> your "small" isp should really have power enough to so
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On Sat, February 21, 2009 12:32, mouss wrote:
>>> rejecting because HELO does not match violates RFC. case open.
>> I said "invalid". a "bare" IP is invalid in helo, and has been since
>> 822.
>
> just use all helo rules that postfix can do pr default is better
> gives t
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On Sat, February 21, 2009 02:38, mouss wrote:
>> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>>> Since you're bouncing any off-list emails because you reject my
>>> entire ISP, I'm going to drop out of aiding on this matter.
>> probably a rule that considers "vms173007pub.verizon.net" as a
>>
On Sun, February 22, 2009 09:15, SM wrote:
> What is a dynamic hostname?
you dont know it either ?
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
On Sun, February 22, 2009 01:11, Greg Troxel wrote:
> X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed
> by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (fnord.ir.bbn.com [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 21 Feb
> 2009 18:44:45 -0500 (EST)
greylist on remote ip 0.0.0.0 ? :)
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100%
On Sat, February 21, 2009 19:11, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Very well, but you're also using a RBL with a known high risk of
> blocking nonspam email.
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=verizon.net
your "small" isp should really have power enough to solve the above
listning very easely,
At 23:16 21-02-2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why does a smtp server have dynamic hostname alike in the first place ?
What is a dynamic hostname?
Regards,
-sm
13 matches
Mail list logo
