Hi,
I recently upgraded to 3.2.5 and re-trained bayes db from scratch. The
auto-learn is on so now I have about 6000 mails trained as spam and 3000
as ham. I tried to manually keep both spam and ham at the same level in
the bayes db but it seems that spamassassin is learning spam twice as
hi --
I've answered a couple, and cc'd the message to the SA users list for more
feedback from other developers and contributors -- it's a lot of questions! ;)
--j.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 18:56, DEMBELE Mariam mariam.demb...@unifr.ch wrote:
Dear Mr Mason,
I am doing my masters in
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
Find out where else you've got use_auto_whitelist 0 in your config,
and remove it.
On the plus side, it does confirm you've correctly disabled the plugin.
I searched all over the place, and following your directions, do you think
this command will find where
From: realshock wael.alt...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 06:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
Find out where else you've got use_auto_whitelist 0 in your config,
and remove it.
On the plus side, it does confirm you've correctly disabled the plugin.
I
What source file is the registry barrier code in?
Thanks in advance.
Jeff Mincy-2 wrote:
spamassassin -D --lint prints out the config files, eg:
spamassassin -D --lint 21 | fgrep 'config: read file'
The use_auto_whitelist is in one of those config files.
-jeff
Worked ... spamassassin --lint returning no errors Rules update are back
to
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
I tried to manually keep both spam and ham at the same level in
the bayes db but it seems that spamassassin is learning spam twice as
fast as ham.
Not surprising, as raw email traffic has a very skewed spam:ham ratio.
Surely you've heard the stats
Marc,
What source file is the registry barrier code in?
Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm
but is slightly out of date, for example it does
not include registered IDN tld names:
XN--0ZWM56D
XN--11B5BS3A9AJ6G
XN--80AKHBYKNJ4F
XN--9T4B11YI5A
XN--DEBA0AD
XN--G6W251D
XN--HGBK6AJ7F53BBA
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 07:25 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
What source file is the registry barrier code in?
M::SA::Util::RegistrarBoundaries
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 16:14, Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
Marc,
What source file is the registry barrier code in?
Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm
but is slightly out of date, for example it does
not include registered IDN tld names:
XN--0ZWM56D
John Rudd wrote on Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:44:29 -0700:
1) Does anyone know of a convenient command line tool (perl library
being ideal) that lets you give it an IP address, and it tells you the
country and/or continent (and that's it)?
google for GeoIP.
2) similarly, does anyone know of a
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 16:31, Justin Mason j...@jmason.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 16:14, Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
Marc,
What source file is the registry barrier code in?
Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm
but is slightly out of date, for example it
Thanks - that was what I was looking for.
Mark Martinec wrote:
Marc,
What source file is the registry barrier code in?
Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm
but is slightly out of date, for example it does
not include registered IDN tld names:
XN--0ZWM56D
XN--11B5BS3A9AJ6G
Arthur Kerpician wrote on Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:41:22 +0300:
The docs mention that after 5000 spam and ham learned,
spamassassin doesn't improve spam detection much.
do they? What is meant is that once you reach some threshold the detection
rate doesn't improve as good as before. You can't get
unsubscribe
As every header states:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
At 09:41 AM 4/9/2009, Juergen Boehm wrote:
unsubscribe
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Arthur Kerpician wrote on Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:41:22 +0300:
The docs mention that after 5000 spam and ham learned,
spamassassin doesn't improve spam detection much.
do they? What is meant is that once you reach some threshold the detection
rate doesn't improve as
Arthur Kerpician wrote:
I was thinking to increase bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam to a higher
number, so less spam is auto-learned. Is this ok?
I try to keep it a 10 to 1 ratio (dropping the _ham threshold and
increasing the _spam threshold), basically, trying to mimic the global
stats
What I am complaining about is that the IP is reported to be dynamic
because it does not have hostname that follows kind of sick rules.
On 09.04.09 01:28, Mark wrote:
Their rules DO seem a mite odd:
Also remember, according to Best Practises, having a reverse DNS that
appears to be part
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 23:49 +0200, mouss wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
Even if that record would be listed in SPF?
SPF again? any spammer can buy a domain and add arbitrary IPs to the SPF
record. you know about fast flux, right?
You are thinking of SPF at the wrong layer. It
On 09/04/09 2:35 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
That's the question. I do not object against listing of a spammer, but
dynamic? naming convention? Will they block host if it spams, if it sends
mail from gmail com and the hostname is qw-out-1920.google.com which looks
like
BWA HAHAHAHA
Someone here isn't just using SA.
Got a bounce saying I said a bad word. For the record, it wasn't me.
Microsoft Antigen for SMTP found a message matching a filter. The message is
currently Purged.
Message: Re_ Spam Rats _ does anyone know them_
Filter name: KEYWORD= profanity:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:55 -0400, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
On 09/04/09 2:35 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
That's the question. I do not object against listing of a spammer, but
dynamic? naming convention? Will they block host if it spams, if it sends
mail from gmail
On 09/04/09 4:06 PM, McDonald, Dan dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com wrote:
I won't block on it alone, but if someone wants a whitelist entry, they
have to have rDNS correct. And preferably an SPF or DKIM policy
Well, an Sender ID-compliant SPF record has long been a requirement for our
McDonald, Dan a écrit :
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 23:49 +0200, mouss wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
Even if that record would be listed in SPF?
SPF again? any spammer can buy a domain and add arbitrary IPs to the SPF
record. you know about fast flux, right?
You are thinking of SPF at
Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
What I am complaining about is that the IP is reported to be dynamic
because it does not have hostname that follows kind of sick rules.
On 09.04.09 01:28, Mark wrote:
Their rules DO seem a mite odd:
Also remember, according to Best Practises, having a
I notice that uribl is listing livejournal.com as a util_rb_2tld host,
but http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/90_2tld.cf doesn't have
livejournal.com yet, and updates_spamassassin_org/25_uribl.cf has
livejournal.com listed in uridnsbl_skip_domain.
If I were to add util_rb_2tld livejournal.com
On Fri, April 10, 2009 00:10, McDonald, Dan wrote:
[snip]
If I were to add util_rb_2tld livejournal.com to local-foo.cf, would
the presence of uridnsbl_skip_domain prevent it from being
checked? And if so, how do I unskip that domain?
no its just subdomain that might be blacklisted in url,
Hi Rob,
At 12:52 07-04-2009, Rob McEwen wrote:
I had no idea that emailreg.org was owned and operated by Barracuda. I
http://www.barracudacentral.org/about/emailreg
http://www.emailreg.org/index.cgi?p=about
But, as the post you mentioned said, emailreg.org resolves to
64.235.146.64 and
29 matches
Mail list logo
