From: drkwc dr...@mindbodyspiritjournal.com
Sent: Tuesday, 2009/September/15 21:20
Jdow, you're pretty sophisticated with this. Afraid much of what you
described is beyond my skillset and/or patience for mastering at the
moment.
Am wondering if I can have two different settings. One for
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2009 02:33:27 schrieb drkwc:
New Spamassassin nb qs:
On the configuration panel, I have SpamAssassin set to mark as spam any
email scoring 5 or above.
I have a rule set in Outlook Express to route those to a SpamAssassin SPAM
folder.
Now, I'm wondering, can I
Hi all,
I have a postfix-amavisd-new-postfix-cyrus imapd through deliver chain up
and running, and amavisd-new faithfully uses clamav to scan for viruses.
I also have a working spamassassin / spamd with dcc and razor2 and all the
toppings, on the same host, with sql-based settings, AWL and
Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi all,
I have a postfix-amavisd-new-postfix-cyrus imapd through deliver chain up
and running, and amavisd-new faithfully uses clamav to scan for viruses.
I also have a working spamassassin / spamd with dcc and razor2 and all the
toppings, on the same host, with
drkwc wrote:
Hostgator told me that with their setup, using their SpamAssassin controls,
I can't set two concurrent rules. i.e. I can't tell SpamAssassin to
autodelete any mail with a score of 10 or higher and also tell it to mark as
[SPAM] and deliver any mail with a score between 5 and 10.
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Ryan Thoryk wrote:
Hi,
We're rebuilding a mail server and are having some issues with SQL-based
SA preference lookups. We're running Postfix 2.5.5 and SA 3.2.5 (Debian
Lenny version) - here's our Postfix config from master.cf:
spamassassin unix - n n -
On 09/04/2009 10:51 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
cheers!
--j.
-rw-r--r-- 174911850 2009/09/16 01:03:40 ham-bayes-net-hege.log
Duane Hill wrote:
You named your pipe in master.cf spamassassin. Do you have:
spamassassin_destination_recipient_limit = 1
in main.cf? To do individual scoring, you need to feed your spamassassin
pipe with one message per recipient.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong. That is, at
Warren Togami wrote:
One day from the deadline for spamassassin-3.3.0 scoring and we
currently have only three people reporting.
Would love to help, but my current mail environment isn't conducive to
keeping a corpus of mail to feed the tests.
Would it be worth contributing data from a brand-new corpus of mail
from the last few days? That's the best I can do presently.
I have plenty of dreams of creating a good, hand verified, corpus of
mail from the last several months, but the development work keeps
getting bumped...
On Wed, Sep
Hi guys
I am looking for a way to ask SA to skip DNSBL checks for a specific IP /
subnet, is it possible to do this ?
Id like something like skip_rbl_checks 1 from=1.2.3.4
And Id like to keep other tests (Bayesian, Razor, ...) active.
Thanks in advance
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:59 -0400, Philippe Ratté wrote:
I am looking for a way to ask SA to skip DNSBL checks for a specific IP /
subnet, is it possible to do this ?
Hmm, why would you want to do that? There are pretty much two scenarios
that immediately come to mind.
You don't want to do BL
On 09/16/2009 01:01 PM, Austin wrote:
Would it be worth contributing data from a brand-new corpus of mail
from the last few days? That's the best I can do presently.
I have plenty of dreams of creating a good, hand verified, corpus of
mail from the last several months, but the development work
-Message d'origine-
De : Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de] Envoyé : 16
septembre 2009 14:21 À : users@spamassassin.apache.org Objet : Re:
Skip DNSBL checks for a specific IP/Net
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:59 -0400, Philippe Ratté wrote:
I am looking for a way to
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Philippe Ratt? wrote:
Alternatively, without re-defining existing rules, you could write
similar metas on top, that counter such a rule hit.
Sorry I do not understand this one, I'm not very familiar with SA rules yet
but still learning :)
Essentially:
meta
Thanks, Rob. So it looks like Hostgator has neutered Spamassassin.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-auto-delete-emails-scoring-10-and-above%2C-yet-mark-as-spam-those-5-and-above--tp25463989p25479369.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 15:47, Warren Togami wtog...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2009 10:51 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the
3.3.0 rescoring, now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
cheers!
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 15:38 -0400, Philippe Ratté wrote:
If it is anything else, we might be much better able to help you, if
we know about the issue -- rather than what you think would be the
best solution. ;)
The situation is about Hotmail. Yesterday a customer told me he was having
I've definitely got the volume required. I'm currently selecting a
random sample of 1% of my site's inbound outbound mail on both ham
spam sides, and will still be reviewing the corpus for several (many?)
hours today to make sure it's clean. I'll see how soon I can get all
of the pieces in
On ons 16 sep 2009 19:59:30 CEST, Philippe Ratté wrote
I am looking for a way to ask SA to skip DNSBL checks for a
specific IP / subnet, is it possible to do this ?
i would say no, but try
trusted_networks 0.0.0.0/0
:-)
just not 0.0.0.0/0 use the skip ip there if you sure know its trusted
Michael Hutchinson [mailto:mhutchin...@manux.co.nz] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charles Gregory [mailto:cgreg...@hwcn.org]
Good users all. Never heard of a troll?
Nonsensical. Irritating. Taunting.
Best defense against this kind of childish antic is to IGNORE it.
On 16/09/2009 4:03 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Who is running a mass-check that's still in progress? (fwiw, I am ;)
I had a NAS failure over the weekend that consumed the time I was
planning on getting my systems right up-to-date for the mass-check. I
now hope to do this Thursday/Friday. I should
excellent. That's 2 people who could do with an extension, then!
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 20:16, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
spamassas...@dostech.ca wrote:
On 16/09/2009 4:03 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Who is running a mass-check that's still in progress? (fwiw, I am ;)
I had a NAS failure over the
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
spamassas...@dostech.ca wrote:
[snip]
now hope to do this Thursday/Friday. I should be able to scan my
million or so messages in a day on my cluster.
Wow, that makes me feel inadequate :) I'm struggling to clean up my
little ham sample of
24 matches
Mail list logo
