-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
to...@starbridge.org a écrit :
> to...@starbridge.org a écrit :
>> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "to...@starbridge.org" wrote
I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
Rule2XSBody active. I've tried
Hi,
> header RCVD_IN_JMF_W eval:check_rbl_sub('JMF-lastexternal', '127.0.0.1')
> describe RCVD_IN_JMF_W Sender listed in JMF-WHITE
> tflags RCVD_IN_JMF_W net nice
> score RCVD_IN_JMF_W -5
Hopefully my comment isn't out of place with the current discussion of
JMF/Hostkarma. I think this is not onl
From: "Marc Perkel"
Sent: Monday, 2009/September/28 19:07
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/28/2009 06:53 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
...
I'd like to keep the name HOSTKARMA as standard.
If that's so, then we probably want that in the spamassassin rule name.
Your wiki page suggests JMF is the name
On 09/28/2009 10:07 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd like to keep the name HOSTKARMA as standard.
If that's so, then we probably want that in the spamassassin rule
name. Your wiki page suggests JMF is the name. A number of people
probably already configured their spamassassin using your suggested
JMF
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/28/2009 06:53 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/28/2009 01:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd be interested in how well it worked. Is there anything I need
to do
to help?
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists
Could you provide a
On 09/28/2009 06:53 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/28/2009 01:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd be interested in how well it worked. Is there anything I need to do
to help?
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists
Could you provide a URL redirector to this pa
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Evan Platt wrote:
At 04:10 PM 9/28/2009, you wrote:
Is it just me, or are others getting multiple copies of list posts the
last hour or so?
Not I Only see a few posts in the last day, and only one of each.
Huh. I guess the ASF MTA doesn't like me, then.
--
John Ha
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 16:10 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> Is it just me, or are others getting multiple copies of list posts the
> last hour or so?
>
Not here.
Martin
At 04:22 PM 9/28/2009, you wrote:
Not I Only see a few posts in the last day, and only one of each.
D'oh... forgot what day it is - I see more than a few posts from
today (19 dated todays date) , but still only one of each.
At 04:10 PM 9/28/2009, you wrote:
Is it just me, or are others getting multiple copies of list posts
the last hour or so?
Not I Only see a few posts in the last day, and only one of each.
Is it just me, or are others getting multiple copies of list posts the
last hour or so?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B8
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/28/2009 01:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd be interested in how well it worked. Is there anything I need to do
to help?
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists
Could you provide a URL redirector to this page? This URL is very
long. Perhaps shorte
This should be easy but I'm missing something. I have a RBL list (dnset)
for host testbl.junkemailfilter.com
:2:Test
.xx.host.example.com :4:
.host.example.com :3:
.example.com :9:
.com :6:
Works fine. But - I want to create an A record for
testbl.junkemailfilter.com of 65.49.42.100. How do I
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, jmunjr wrote:
Thanks once again.
Here is my procmailrc:
TRAP=/etc/webmin/virtual-server/procmail-logger.pl
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
Okay, that will indeed work, but it's a _lot_ of overhead if you have more
than a small ema
Thanks once again.
Here is my procmailrc:
TRAP=/etc/webmin/virtual-server/procmail-logger.pl
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
$DEFAULT
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
ORGMAIL=$HOME/Maildir/
# Mails with a score of 15 or higher are almost certa
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 16:52 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> I sent this to our support group, but looks like there can be some
> issues, and maybe a better way.
Wrong list - this is an amavisd question
> while there cannot be a duplicate id:
>
> (maddr id = 5) can't exist in partition_tag
I sent this to our support group, but looks like there can be some
issues, and maybe a better way.
while there cannot be a duplicate id:
(maddr id = 5) can't exist in partition_tag 23 AND 24,
the email address CAN exist in multiple partitions, is this the intended
results?
seems that daily,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, jmunjr wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. I really appreciate them.
Message size.
Mail is not being restricted by message size.
We'd need to see the spamc command line options to tell for sure.
System overload.
Server almost always has a load under 1.00, though
Thanks for all the responses. I really appreciate them.
> Message size.
Mail is not being restricted by message size.
> System overload.
Server almost always has a load under 1.00, though at night numerous scripts
run bringing the server load to ~1.50-2.00 at times.
> Possibly DNS timeouts.
On 09/28/2009 01:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd be interested in how well it worked. Is there anything I need to do
to help?
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists
Could you provide a URL redirector to this page? This URL is very long.
Perhaps shorter URL in the describe of
On 09/28/2009 01:45 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd be interested in how well it worked. Is there anything I need to do
to help?
1) I'm waiting to hear back what it will take for me to gain commit
access so I can add this to the sandbox.
2) Do you mind hundreds of thousands of rapid DNS lookups du
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/28/2009 01:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/09/2009 09:57 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth I'm now ahead of Barracuda on Jeff Makey's
blacklist
comparison chart. Not a scientific comparison but it's about all there
is to compare bla
On 09/28/2009 01:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/09/2009 09:57 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth I'm now ahead of Barracuda on Jeff Makey's blacklist
comparison chart. Not a scientific comparison but it's about all there
is to compare blacklists. Now only abuseat
Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/09/2009 09:57 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth I'm now ahead of Barracuda on Jeff Makey's blacklist
comparison chart. Not a scientific comparison but it's about all there
is to compare blacklists. Now only abuseat.org and spamhaus have me
beat. (apews doesn
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 09:25 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Karsten Brckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:37 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
Another note which I've seen here before: Drop the [.,] for the host
part of a uri rule. It's no
Henrik K wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:21:29PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Henrik K wrote:
>>
>> > Current iXhash has many bugs, which I noticed when I worked on my
>> > own version with SA native DNS lookups.
>> >
>> > One of the bigger problems of iXhash is probably of historical
>> > na
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:21:29PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Henrik K wrote:
>
> > Current iXhash has many bugs, which I noticed when I worked on my own
> > version with SA native DNS lookups.
> >
> > One of the bigger problems of iXhash is probably of historical nature.
> > There is no decoding
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 09:25 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Karsten Brckelmann wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:37 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> > Another note which I've seen here before: Drop the [.,] for the host
> > part of a uri rule. It's not a URI if it contains a comma,
On Monday September 28 2009 04:58:42 MySQL Student wrote:
> Mark suggested in the bugzilla update that I "change SpamAssassin to
> add 'use utf8' into code generated from rules when it sees it is being
> run with a pre-5.8 version of perl." How do I do this for the time
> being?
Try the following
Henrik K wrote:
> Current iXhash has many bugs, which I noticed when I worked on my own
> version with SA native DNS lookups.
>
> One of the bigger problems of iXhash is probably of historical nature.
> There is no decoding of messages (base64 etc).
>
> Looking at method #1, which is supposed to
30 matches
Mail list logo
