On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote:
DNS checks would be overkill for a list that doesn't change that often.
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/ has good info,
Yes agreed, we have used Robs templates for a long time :)
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell o
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:16:29PM +1000, Res wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote:
>
>
> (?:[01257]|(?!127.0.0.)127|22[3-9]|2[3-9]\d|[12]\d{3,}|[3-9]\d\d+)\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+
Thats crazy! It's wrong since 1/8 is now allocated, it also does not
detect most other
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote:
(?:[01257]|(?!127.0.0.)127|22[3-9]|2[3-9]\d|[12]\d{3,}|[3-9]\d\d+)\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+
Thats crazy! It's wrong since 1/8 is now allocated, it also does not
detect most other bogon ranges, What is the point of this...
Another rule I now need to disable.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:00:46PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Res wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, RW wrote:
>>
>>> It appears to be just a regular expression:
>>
>>> sub check_for_illegal_ip {
>>> my ($self, $pms) = @_;
>>>
>>> foreach my $rcvd ( @{$pms->{relays_untrust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Res wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, RW wrote:
It appears to be just a regular expression:
sub check_for_illegal_ip {
my ($self, $pms) = @_;
foreach my $rcvd ( @{$pms->{relays_untrusted}} ) {
# (note this might miss some hits if the Received.pm skips any
invalid
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, RW wrote:
It appears to be just a regular expression:
sub check_for_illegal_ip {
my ($self, $pms) = @_;
foreach my $rcvd ( @{$pms->{relays_untrusted}} ) {
# (note this might miss some hits if the Received.pm skips any
invalid IPs) foreach my $check ( $rcvd->{ip},
We've delayed when we're going to do the press release so I'm still open
to (and looking for) quotes for use in the press release.
Please send quotes my way... it's a good way to get free publicity for
your organization.
Daryl
On 17/01/2010 4:45 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm
On 18/01/2010 1:05 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> How About:
>
> "As the per-seat costs for any available commercial spamfilter solution
> exceed the margin for a retail Internet service account, SpamAssassin
> is the only spamfilter solution usable by ISPs"
>
> Nothing like the truth, eh? ;-)
I'
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:19:14 +1000 (EST)
Res wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Can anyone tell me how the bogon list in this rule is updated?
> Does it query a live bogon DNS server? The wiki does not explain or
> say much at all about it.
>
> Thanks
>
It appears to be just a regular expression:
sub c
Greetings,
Can anyone tell me how the bogon list in this rule is updated?
Does it query a live bogon DNS server? The wiki does not explain or say
much at all about it.
Thanks
--
Res
"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 21:48 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Jason Bertoch a écrit :
> > This is an list administration problem, not something that every poster
> > here should have to fix locally.
>
> Unfortunately, that's only partially true.
>
> - if the problem is at the "MTA" side, then it will show ag
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Robert Ober wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:19:57 -0600:
"score FH-DATE-PAST-20XX 0.0"
which is wrong, the rule has underscores. Read the article on
http://spamassassin.apache.org/
Kai
Thanks, I cut and pasted that from someone's forum post. Fortunately
sa-
Jason Bertoch a écrit :
> On 1/18/2010 6:38 PM, mouss wrote:
>> David B Funk a écrit :
>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
>>>
Can a list admin disable the spamassas...@hundredacrewood.willspc.net
account as we're still getting bounces?
Original Message -
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mikael Syska wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Stephane MAGAND
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Since Jun 2008, he don't have a new version of spamassassin ? the project
>> are dead ?
>
> Are you even reading the mailing list? or 3.3.0 should published soon.
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Stephane MAGAND
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since Jun 2008, he don't have a new version of spamassassin ? the project
> are dead ?
Are you even reading the mailing list? or 3.3.0 should published soon.
> I wan change my mail server, actually with a old version of spama
Hi
Since Jun 2008, he don't have a new version of spamassassin ? the project
are dead ?
I wan change my mail server, actually with a old version of spamassassin.
Can you say me the best
choice for best result ?
SpamAssassin + ?
what rules.cf
Pyzor ? Razor ? Dcc ?
What RBL ?
If i
Robert Ober wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:19:57 -0600:
> "score FH-DATE-PAST-20XX 0.0"
which is wrong, the rule has underscores. Read the article on
http://spamassassin.apache.org/
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
I suggest you read the homepage: http://spamassassin.apache.org/
If this didn't help you, then please give more details about how you use
SA and what you did to correct the problem.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Mamalos wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:19:30 -0800 (PST):
> > $subject =~ s/[^a-zA-Z]//g; # only look at letters
The relevant part seems to be this. It removes all other characters
(i9ncluding the Greek ones). As I said, it's hard to determine capitals
for each and every language. So
On 1/19/10 9:19 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote:
> Daniel McDonald wrote:
>>
>> On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem
>>> persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5
>>> from that distribution.
On 01/19/2010 10:47 AM, Robert Ober wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well.
Warren
I did not think it was enabled on that machine but it was. I ran
sa-update and problem solved.
Sorry to 'bother y'all, I should have checked for sa-up
Warren Togami wrote:
Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well.
Warren
I did not think it was enabled on that machine but it was. I ran
sa-update and problem solved.
Sorry to 'bother y'all, I should have checked for sa-update.
Thanks,
Robert A. Ober
Did you enable sa-update? That will get rid of the broken rule as well.
Warren
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Mike Cardwell wrote:
: Then I don't know the Greek alphabet. The relevant subroutine from
: SpamAssassin::Plugin::HeaderEval is below:
:$subject =~ s/[^a-zA-Z]//g; # only look at letters
I think the 'issue' is that spamassassin *should* have some 'higher level'
c
Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote:
Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem
persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5
from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The
local.cf fix did not c
On 1/19/10 9:02 AM, "Robert Ober" wrote:
> Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem
> persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5
> from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The
> local.cf fix did not change anything after
Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem
persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5
from that distribution. They have no newer according to yum. The
local.cf fix did not change anything after restarting spamassassin.
For some reason spamass
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
rp wrote on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:07:17 -0800:
Anyone else having this problem?
You should have read the list or googled first.
Kai
Well, I have googled it and read lot's of stuff and the problem
persists. I have a server on CentOS 5.3 with spamassassin-3.
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:52 -0200, Taylon Silmer wrote:
> Hello guys!
>
> I have a lot of mail servers running spamassassin and I never had false
> positives problems.
>
> Recently I installed more one server and I'm having a lot of false
> positives problem with it. I understand that spamassas
On 1/19/2010 7:52 AM, Taylon Silmer wrote:
Hello guys!
I use:
Postfix 2.3.3
Amavis 2.6.4
Spamassassin 3.2.5
CentOS 5.4 with linux kernel 2.6.18
The spamassassin rules are updated and the amavis and postfix
configuration files are the same in all servers (so, make no sense to be
some problem o
On 1/18/2010 6:38 PM, mouss wrote:
David B Funk a écrit :
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Can a list admin disable the spamassas...@hundredacrewood.willspc.net
account as we're still getting bounces?
Original Message
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
On 19.01.10 10:52, Taylon Silmer wrote:
> I have a lot of mail servers running spamassassin and I never had false
> positives problems.
>
> Recently I installed more one server and I'm having a lot of false
> positives problem with it. I understand that spamassassin is a software
> and it can get
Mamalos wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:11:49 -0800 (PST):
> The mail is encoded as well as the subject. Here is an example:
Yeah, and they are lower-case, I see.
> So, where should I report this bug?
I think the problem here is determination of capital/non-capital letters in
other scripts than A
Mike Cardwell-16 wrote:
>
> On 19/01/2010 10:07, mamalos wrote:
>
>>> I just pasted that email into spamalyser.com and it gave this:
>>> http://spamalyser.com/v/u32d10ix/mime
>>>
>>> The subject looks fully capitalised to me when decoded? I'm not overly
>>> proficient on my Greek though.
>>>
>
Hello guys!
I have a lot of mail servers running spamassassin and I never had false
positives problems.
Recently I installed more one server and I'm having a lot of false
positives problem with it. I understand that spamassassin is a software
and it can get wrong sometimes, the another servers ge
On 19/01/2010 10:07, mamalos wrote:
I just pasted that email into spamalyser.com and it gave this:
http://spamalyser.com/v/u32d10ix/mime
The subject looks fully capitalised to me when decoded? I'm not overly
proficient on my Greek though.
--
Mike Cardwell: UK based IT Consultant, LAMP deve
Mike Cardwell-16 wrote:
>
> On 19/01/2010 09:11, mamalos wrote:
>
and at least one of the
Greek words is not capitalized,
>>>
>>> Greek? In a subject? Encoded, unencoded?
>>>
I assume that through this list, someone who is an editor of
these rulesets may be informed and cor
On 19/01/2010 09:11, mamalos wrote:
and at least one of the
Greek words is not capitalized,
Greek? In a subject? Encoded, unencoded?
I assume that through this list, someone who is an editor of
these rulesets may be informed and correct this misbehavior.
You can submit it as a bug. But fir
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> Mamalos wrote on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:01:53 -0800 (PST):
>
>> and at least one of the
>> Greek words is not capitalized,
>
> Greek? In a subject? Encoded, unencoded?
>
>> I assume that through this list, someone who is an editor of
>> these rulesets may be informed and
39 matches
Mail list logo
