Re: The ninjas have left the building (was Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush)

2010-01-31 Thread Jeff Chan
On Friday, January 29, 2010, 12:27:59 PM, Marc Sherman wrote: Matija Nalis wrote: Also note that SARE Ninjas are long gone - see main page http://www.rulesemporium.com/. So nobody could fix those rules even if they thought it was a good idea (and at least some people are not convinced it is

Re: The ninjas have left the building (was Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush)

2010-01-31 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! Also note that SARE Ninjas are long gone - see main page http://www.rulesemporium.com/. So nobody could fix those rules even if they thought it was a good idea (and at least some people are not convinced it is a bad idea); and even if the rules could be fixed, still at least half the world

Re: repair bayes db ?

2010-01-31 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote on Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:56:34 +0100: it should be enough to rebuild table bayes_global_vars. He isn't using SQL it seems. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: spamassassin-3.3.0 for Fedora/RHEL

2010-01-31 Thread Kai Schaetzl
R-Elists wrote on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:56:22 -0800: i appreciate your input, yet i really wanted Warren to answer for his blog post on it in specific terms related to SA i can handle absolutes pretty easy... if we shouldnt use SARE with 3.3.x, no prob. How long have you been following

LDAP error: Argument scope isn't numeric in addition (+) at /usr/share/perl5/Net/LDAP.pm line 468

2010-01-31 Thread ml ml
Hello List, i am using Debian Lenny with spamassassin (3.2.5-2+lenny2), perl (5.10.0-19lenny2) and slapd (2.4.11-1+lenny1). In /etc/spamassassin/local.cf i have: user_scores_dsn ldap://localhost:389/ou=customer,dc=hq,dc=example,dc=net?attr?scope?uid=__USERNAME__ In my log i get this error:

Re: LDAP error: Argument scope isn't numeric in addition (+) at /usr/share/perl5/Net/LDAP.pm line 468

2010-01-31 Thread ml ml
ok, this was a stupid Copy+paste mistake. the correct line should be: ldap://localhost:389/ou=customer,dc=hq,dc=example,dc=net?spamassassin?sub?uid=__USERNAME__ :) On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:43 PM, ml ml mliebher...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello List, i am using Debian Lenny with spamassassin

LDAP Filter: __USERNAME__

2010-01-31 Thread ml ml
Hello List, i currently have this dsn: user_scores_dsn ldap://localhost:389/ou=customer,dc=hq,dc=imos,dc=net?spamassassin?sub?uid=__USERNAME__ However, i do not want user based configs, but a Domain based config. Somthing like: user_scores_dsn

PORTERS QUESTION: SA 3.3.0 and rules

2010-01-31 Thread Michael Scheidell
Working on official SA 3.3.0 port for Freebsd, have a Question: if user who installs SA 3.3.0 does NOT install or use sa-update, then I have to install the default ruleset. where should I put it? into the updates directory? ../3.003000/updates_spamassassin_org/ or where it was for 3.2.5?

Re: Magical mystery colon

2010-01-31 Thread Philip A. Prindeville
On 01/30/2010 12:24 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 12:16 -0800, Philip A. Prindeville wrote: I ran yum update on my FC11 machine a couple of days ago, and now I'm getting nightly cron errors: Would be nice and maybe even helpful to know, what command(s) that

Re: PORTERS QUESTION: SA 3.3.0 and rules

2010-01-31 Thread Jack Raats
From: Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net Working on official SA 3.3.0 port for Freebsd, have a Question: if user who installs SA 3.3.0 does NOT install or use sa-update, then I have to install the default ruleset. where should I put it? into the updates directory?

Re: PORTERS QUESTION: SA 3.3.0 and rules

2010-01-31 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 1/31/10 3:51 PM, Jack Raats wrote: I would vote for the update directory and automagically run sa-update when installing the port unattended. would save disk space, and (I assume) overwrite older files. however.. there still is ../share/spamassassin these files anyway: (raw install, no

RC1 for Freebsd port of 3.30.

2010-01-31 Thread Michael Scheidell
I am the official Freebsd ports maintainer for SA. I have RC1 of the Freebsd port ready for testing. post request here. note: everything is up for changing as I test. looks like it installs on 7.1, amd64, perl 5.8.9. Looking to test perl 5.8.8, 5.10.0, threaded perl 5.10.0, i386, 7.2 and

Re: PORTERS QUESTION: SA 3.3.0 and rules

2010-01-31 Thread Michael Scheidell
maybe I should have read ../INSTALL file :-) Install rules from a compressed tar archive: sa-update --install Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-xxx.tgz -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2008-9 Hot

Re: PORTERS QUESTION: SA 3.3.0 and rules

2010-01-31 Thread RW
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:21:10 -0500 Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net wrote: maybe I should have read ../INSTALL file :-) Install rules from a compressed tar archive: sa-update --install Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-xxx.tgz Isn't it sending out the wrong message to automate this as an

warn: reporter: DCC report via dccproc failed

2010-01-31 Thread Chris
SA 3.3.0, just installed via CPAN this afternoon. When running my spam reporter script I noticed this: warn: reporter: DCC report via dccproc failed: Can't locate object method close_pipe_fh via package Mail::SpamAssassin::Reporter at /etc/mail/spamassassin/DCC.pm line 803, DCC line 2. Jan 31

Re: warn: reporter: DCC report via dccproc failed

2010-01-31 Thread Chris
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 20:03 -0600, Chris wrote: SA 3.3.0, just installed via CPAN this afternoon. When running my spam reporter script I noticed this: warn: reporter: DCC report via dccproc failed: Can't locate object method close_pipe_fh via package Mail::SpamAssassin::Reporter at

Summary Tokens

2010-01-31 Thread Chris
Has the format for this changed from 3.2.5 to 3.3.0? Looking at the headers of a message scanned with 3.2.5 I see: X-spam-token: Summary Tokens: new, 170; hammy, 151; neutral, 474; spammy, 0. X-spam-hammy: 0.000-173--219h-0s--7d--H*RU:sk:owner-t, 0.000-96--122h-0s--5d--Smarter With 3.3.0:

Re: how can i finetune to spamassassin to handle spams

2010-01-31 Thread ram
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote: ram wrote: The rules in /usr/share/spamassassin are the original rules from the install. If /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002.005 exists, those rules will be used instead. You can verify which rules

Re: how can i finetune to spamassassin to handle spams

2010-01-31 Thread ram
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:41 PM, David Morton morto...@dgrmm.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bowie Bailey wrote: ram wrote: iam still in confuse, how can i fine tune sitewide rules to send all the users to send spam mails to one user ID and configure rule to

Sought Rules Back?

2010-01-31 Thread Jared Hall
Update returned sought rules 1/31/2010. Had to pinch myself 2.5 times (1 per month) to be sure. Thanks.

Re: Smut spam

2010-01-31 Thread John Wilcock
Le 30/01/2010 10:32, Ned Slider a écrit : There is already a from Hotmail rule in 20_head_tests.cf for use in meta rules that may suffice? header __FROM_HOTMAIL_COMFrom =~ /\...@hotmail\.com\b/i Bear in mind, however, that not all hotmail users have hotmail.com domains. There are