Re: doubt in using bayesian filter

2010-06-08 Thread Daniel Lemke
aquero wrote: Hi, i have setup spam-assassin and enabled Bayesian filter. Do i have to install the db required for Bayesian filter? or, is there any central database for spam-assassin Bayesian filter which it will automatically access? SpamAssassin uses Berkeley DB, an embedded

RE: Treat MAPI submitted mail like SMTP

2010-06-08 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
We are using the CommuniGate Pro mail server, which allows Outlook user to submit messages using the Microsoft's MAPI protocol to submit messages across the IMAP port. The problem that we are having is that although the messages are submitted directly from an authenticated client connection,

Re: doubt in using bayesian filter

2010-06-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:56:27 -0700 (PDT) aquero aravindr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, i have setup spam-assassin and enabled Bayesian filter. Do i have to install the db required for Bayesian filter? or, is there any central database for spam-assassin Bayesian filter which it will

Exim - Spamassassin

2010-06-08 Thread Grant Peel
Hi all, I am using spamassassin with Exim. I have a router in the middle of the Exim configuration as such: spamcheck_router: driver = accept no_verify condition = ${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq {$received_protocol}\ {spam-scanned}}} {1}{0}} transport = spamcheck When the

Re: Exim - Spamassassin

2010-06-08 Thread a . smith
Hi all, I am using spamassassin with Exim. I have a router in the middle of the Exim configuration as such: spamcheck_router: driver = accept no_verify condition = ${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq {$received_protocol}\ {spam-scanned}}} {1}{0}} transport = spamcheck When the

Re: Exim - Spamassassin

2010-06-08 Thread a . smith
Hi all, I am using spamassassin with Exim. I have a router in the middle of the Exim configuration as such: spamcheck_router: driver = accept no_verify condition = ${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq {$received_protocol}\ {spam-scanned}}} {1}{0}} transport = spamcheck When the

Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 13.10.2009 12:13, Jonas Eckerman wrote: John Hardin wrote: There were mutterings about a generic plugin that would take an attachment, process it somehow (e.g. wvHtml, antiword, ps2ascii, or whatever was appropriate), and insert the results into the body text to be scanned by the regular

RE: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Scott Ostrander
-Original Message- From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM Subject: Re: word file spam But SA -D --lint says Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at

Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote: -Original Message- From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM Subject: Re: word file spam But SA -D --lint says Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure dependency in eval

Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 8.6.2010 22:23, Jari Fredriksson wrote: On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote: -Original Message- From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM Subject: Re: word file spam But SA -D --lint says Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin:

RE: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Scott Ostrander
On 8.6.2010 22:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote: -Original Message- From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] But then no. It gets BAYES_99 now, but then I think it still does not work. Jun 8 22:38:00.931 [21328] dbg: extracttext: External call: unrtf

Re: word file spam

2010-06-08 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 8.6.2010 22:56, Scott Ostrander wrote: On 8.6.2010 22:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote: -Original Message- From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi] But then no. It gets BAYES_99 now, but then I think it still does not work. Jun 8 22:38:00.931 [21328] dbg: extracttext:

Re: Rules updates

2010-06-08 Thread James Ralston
On 2010-05-21 at 03:09+02 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote: 3.2.x is in maintenance, and gets emergency rule updates *exclusively*. As it has been for quite a long time. 3.3.x uses a new rule update model, and gets frequent updates. IFF the mass-check corpus is large

Re: Rules updates

2010-06-08 Thread Matt Kettler
On 6/8/2010 5:48 PM, James Ralston wrote: On 2010-05-21 at 03:09+02 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote: 3.2.x is in maintenance, and gets emergency rule updates *exclusively*. As it has been for quite a long time. 3.3.x uses a new rule update model, and gets frequent

SA Timed out..

2010-06-08 Thread Alex
Hi, I have a server that's frequently pretty busy during the day, and just started to notice these messages periodically: Jun 8 13:35:39 mail01 amavis[28784]: (28784-272) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace: at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/IO/Select.pm line

Re: Rules updates

2010-06-08 Thread Alex
Hi,  We also very loudly repeatedly state on the list that if you want to keep abreast of the latest spam, you need to be running the latest version of the codebase (can't take advantage of new features without it!), but don't have that clearly documented either. It would be great if you

Re: Rules updates

2010-06-08 Thread Matt Kettler
On 6/8/2010 11:22 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, We also very loudly repeatedly state on the list that if you want to keep abreast of the latest spam, you need to be running the latest version of the codebase (can't take advantage of new features without it!), but don't have that clearly

SA checking of authenticated users' messages

2010-06-08 Thread Louis Guillaume
Hi, Recently I've had a lot of reports of returned mail from authenticated users. The messages are being bounced on the way out. I understand that SA checks outbound messages, but I have discovered two things, one of them rather disturbing: 1. I cannot find a way to simply trust