Hi @ all
sorry, but I have to pick up this issue once again.
I´ve installed Spamassassin with bayes on a SuseLinux-Client.
My mailserver (hmailserver) is running on a Windows machine.
The Mailserver has a mailbox for spam and ham inside of themself, where
Users can send mails to.
I want
From: Hans-Werner Friedemann [mailto:h-w.friedem...@vds-herzberg.de]
Hi @ all
sorry, but I have to pick up this issue once again.
I´ve installed Spamassassin with bayes on a SuseLinux-Client.
My mailserver (hmailserver) is running on a Windows machine.
The Mailserver has a mailbox
Hello,
i don't know spamassassin not very well, i am using 3.2.4 on Ubuntu 8.04
LTS.
I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like Viagra,
Chronometer, Zeitmesser and so on, if an email has one of this words,
this email should directly put to the Spam-folder.
Is this possible?
Hello,
i don't know spamassassin not very well, i am using 3.2.4 on Ubuntu
8.04
LTS.
I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like Viagra,
Chronometer, Zeitmesser and so on, if an email has one of this
words,
this email should directly put to the Spam-folder.
Is this
You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
installation, but a simple rule like the one you suggest may easily yield
FPs (False Positives, ie: non-spam messages may get into your trashcan).
What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
chronometer...
What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
chronometer...
This is very unlikely because i have none. So even if he asked, it were in
vain :-)
SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes works, and
all the available SA plugins.
I trained SA since
You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
installation
Could you give me an example, or where to find one? In the local.cf i don't
find RegExp-sections.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Blacklist-for-spam-words-tp29726548p29726801.html
Sent from
On 2010-09-16 12:29, franc wrote:
You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
installation
Could you give me an example, or where to find one? In the local.cf i don't
find RegExp-sections.
see http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:42:44 -0400
Dennis German dger...@real-world-systems.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:42 PM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:18:20 -0400
Dennis German dger...@real-world-systems.com wrote:
I believe that bayes_seen is a perl hash and will not be reduced
in
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
Martin
franc wrote:
You may setup a regexp rule in the /etc/local.cf file of your SA
installation
Could you give me an example, or where to find one? In the local.cf i
don't find RegExp-sections.
body FRANCS_RULE /regexp/
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
Appears to be a perfectly reputable service to me... what makes
SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes
works, and
all the available SA plugins.
I trained SA since months with all those chronometer-zeitmesser-spam
and
only 5% is now set to spam.
I want to get rid of it immediately.
Well, you may try putting this into
On 2010-09-16 13:36, Giles Coochey wrote:
On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
Appears to be a
What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
chronometer...
This is very unlikely because i have none. So even if he asked, it were in
vain :-)
SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes works, and
all the available SA plugins.
On 16.09.10
You're probably too late, Matus: you've got into his trash folder... ;)
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
chronometer...
--^
This is very unlikely because i have none. So even if he asked, it
Hi there,
just finished a new release of SpamAssassin for Windows (a Windows port of
SpamAssassin).
Most important change to the previous version is the support of Razor and
some improvements to stability. However, there is still a memory leak so
using it with a service tool is still
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:36 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote:
On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, franc wrote:
I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like Viagra,
Chronometer, Zeitmesser and so on, if an email has one of this
words, this email should directly put to the Spam-folder.
Are you sure you want to embark in a project like that and will have
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
I?ve installed Spamassassin with bayes on a SuseLinux-Client.
My mailserver (hmailserver) is running on a Windows machine.
The Mailserver has a mailbox for spam and ham inside of themself, where
Users can send mails to.
I want to perform a
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, franc wrote:
i don't know spamassassin not very well, i am using 3.2.4 on Ubuntu 8.04
LTS.
I need a textfile where i can put in blacklist-words like Viagra,
Chronometer, Zeitmesser and so on, if an email has one of this
words, this email should directly put to the
But before you go trying to play whack-a-mole
with lists of poison-pill words (and deal with the FPs that result), you
should try upgrading to the latest release.
I would like to update spamassassin, but how?
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, franc wrote:
But before you go trying to play whack-a-mole with lists of poison-pill
words (and deal with the FPs that result), you should try upgrading to
the latest release.
I would like to update spamassassin, but how?
The rule for reliability is update the way you
Unfortunately Canonical probably is _not_ going to provide official SA
3.3.x packages for Ubuntu 8.x...
This is just what i noticed: there is no Ubuntu package update after the
3.2.4-ubu1 related to:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/hardy/spamassassin
But how then to update? Can i use a
On tor 16 sep 2010 17:41:05 CEST, John Hardin wrote
that result), you should try upgrading to the latest release. 3.2.4
is several years stale and is not getting any rule updates. Its
performance _will_ deteriorate over time as the nature of spam
changes.
agree, but if the host os still
On tor 16 sep 2010 17:47:12 CEST, franc wrote
But before you go trying to play whack-a-mole
with lists of poison-pill words (and deal with the FPs that result), you
should try upgrading to the latest release.
I would like to update spamassassin, but how?
42, na not this time, tell more on
On tor 16 sep 2010 18:08:46 CEST, franc wrote
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/hardy/spamassassin
But how then to update? Can i use a package for Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) or
is this the absolute wrong way?
ask a ubuntu maintainer, make a request for this in lunchpad seems to
me next step
if
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 03:26 -0700, Franc Walter(?) wrote:
SA goes farther than your simple idea. Have a look at how Bayes works, and
all the available SA plugins.
I trained SA since months with all those chronometer-zeitmesser-spam and
only 5% is now set to spam.
I want to get rid of it
... Do you train *both*, spam *and* ham? Any chance these
have been trained incorrectly before? What Bayes score do they actually
get? The X-Spam-Status header would be sufficient to see.
The few lines of 'sa-learn --dump magic' would be good, too. Oh, and you
are training Bayes as the
are spamassassin the only thing you like to upgrade ?
what os are you running ?, and what package managedment rpm ?, cpan ?,
lastly dont mix cpan with rpm
yes, spamassassin is the only thing to upgrade at the moment.
I am running Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (Hardy Heron) and i installed spamassassin
You're probably too late, Matus: you've got into his trash folder... ;)
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
What if a friend of yours sends you an email asking to lend your
chronometer...
--^
haha, this one is good!
:-)
But anyway, i didn't put an i to the
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 11:32 -0700, franc wrote:
... Do you train *both*, spam *and* ham? Any chance these
have been trained incorrectly before? What Bayes score do they actually
get? The X-Spam-Status header would be sufficient to see.
The few lines of 'sa-learn --dump magic' would be
On tor 16 sep 2010 20:37:07 CEST, franc wrote
yes, spamassassin is the only thing to upgrade at the moment.
I am running Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (Hardy Heron) and i installed spamassassin with
aptitude.
then i will suggest to try here
https://launchpad.net/hardy-backports
make a request for upgrade
OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
is bounced.
I think after a while i will know if i can put 2,5,6.31,10 or something like
this.
Thank you for the hints!
--
View this message
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 14:19 -0700, franc wrote:
OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
is bounced.
I think after a while i will know if i can put 2,5,6.31,10 or something like
I seriously hope you just mis-worded that. Bounce!? That would be after
*accepting* a message, and with spam generally will be bounced to a
forged, innocent bystander -- not the spammer. So please, tell me you
actually meant to say REJECT. That is, not accept by the MX.
No, i didn't know it
We're seeing a lot of what I assume are exploit files coming from yahoo.com.
They are all base64 encoded HTML attachments with a bunch of javascript in them.
http://pastebin.com/ZSmW0kwW
I've gone ahead and put a pretty high scoring rule in place to block things
that are:
1) From yahoo.com
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:10 -0700, franc wrote:
I seriously hope you just mis-worded that. Bounce!? That would be after
*accepting* a message, and with spam generally will be bounced to a
forged, innocent bystander -- not the spammer. So please, tell me you
actually meant to say REJECT.
The next thing i just discovered is:
$final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS;
with this rule, each Subject, containing 8-Bit, is sent to the quarantine
folder.
I didn't know this and now i am discovering many emails in the quarantine
which were no spam at all :-)
I commented it out:
#
Hi , in you sources.list you have 2 lines
#deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main restricted
universe multiverse
#deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main
restricted universe multiverse
Uncomment that lines and try to
apt-get update apt-get upgrade
On tor 16 sep 2010 23:19:34 CEST, franc wrote
OK, i put now till i am sure there is no more FP the threshold on -, 5, 10,
15 so between 5 and 10 it is delivered into the spam-folder, and with 10 it
is bounced.
rejected please, eg dont accept and bouce
--
xpoint
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 01:57 +0300, Sergey Tsabolov wrote:
I Just upgrade my SpamAssassin to version 3.2.5
Can some one tell me if the SpamAssassin rules files is up to date or is
older with this version :
5682 2010-01-02 17:23 10_default_prefs.cf
Jan 2 2010
στις 17/09/2010 02:15 πμ, O/H Karsten Bräckelmann έγραψε:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 01:57 +0300, Sergey Tsabolov wrote:
I Just upgrade my SpamAssassin to version 3.2.5
Can some one tell me if the SpamAssassin rules files is up to date or is
older with this version :
5682 2010-01-02 17:23
We currently have this combination as part of our control panel with Exim,
SpamAssassin, and ClamAV. I would like to be able to offer this as an
e-mail scrubbing service that would allow the customer to register only his
domain. Then he would make his lowest-cost MX our server. We would bring
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:29 -0700, IT_Architect wrote:
We currently have this combination as part of our control panel with Exim,
SpamAssassin, and ClamAV. I would like to be able to offer this as an
e-mail scrubbing service that would allow the customer to register only his
domain. Then he
On fre 17 sep 2010 00:30:27 CEST, Chris Owen wrote
1) From yahoo.com
2) Have a HTML attachment
3) Are base64 encoded
My question is how important is #1.
check dkim if its signed by yahoo there is better chances thay listing :)
I'd think a HTML attachment is a little unusual period but how
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, IT_Architect wrote:
We currently have this combination as part of our control panel with
Exim, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV. I would like to be able to offer this
as an e-mail scrubbing service that would allow the customer to register
only his domain. Then he would make
I gather from all of this you don't know how to build such a filter nor know
of a How To I'm buying this type of service now from DynDNS that uses
this combination and it works quite well.
--
View this message in context:
You're asking for help, being rude about it will not get you very far.
Little google search foo:
http://www.section6.net/wiki/index.php/Setting_up_Postfix_Spamassassin_Amavi
sd_Clamav
Without avis:
http://www.xtarutaru.com/2009/04/16/spamassassin-clamav-postfix-without-amav
is-debian/
There
Hi
I run spamassassin via MailScanner and in the MailScanner I have
enabled the DNSBL check.
Regards
Milind Patil
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Sent: 14 September 2010 11:37
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamassassing not
50 matches
Mail list logo
