OK, i updated it with cpan after uninstalling.
But i had to change something in amavis-new, according to:
http://o-o-s.de/?p=2735
And now my sa-config is in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
Before, it was one level higher, which is really not important.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.n
On fre 17 sep 2010 16:55:11 CEST, Lawren Quigley-Jones wrote
I'm running SpamAssassin on ubuntu hardy: spamassassin 3.2.4-1ubuntu1.2
is this a joke ?
:)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
στις 17/09/2010 09:21 μμ, O/H Neil Lazarow έγραψε:
Sergey Tsabolov ( aka linuxman ) wrote:
στις 17/09/2010 05:55 μμ, O/H Lawren Quigley-Jones έγραψε:
I've been repeatedly running into problems where dns white-lists
have been causing false negatives in spam. Valid looking headers are
being
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Joseph Brennan wrote:
On fre 17 sep 2010 00:30:27 CEST, Chris Owen wrote
> 1) From yahoo.com
> 2) Have a HTML attachment
> 3) Are base64 encoded
The html includes something like this, inside a comment. It's really
over a hundred escaped characters:
document.write(u
On fre 17 sep 2010 00:30:27 CEST, Chris Owen wrote
1) From yahoo.com
2) Have a HTML attachment
3) Are base64 encoded
The html includes something like this, inside a comment. It's really
over a hundred escaped characters:
document.write(unescape("%3C%53%43%52%49%50%54%20%4C
and I think
On Sep 17, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> They're not really from Yahoo. No DKIM, no Newman property. That's
> a fake header.
Looks like I missed the real header.
All the better I guess though. Makes catching these even easier.
Chris
--
--
--On Thursday, September 16, 2010 17:30 -0500 Chris Owen
wrote:
We're seeing a lot of what I assume are exploit files coming from
yahoo.com.
They are all base64 encoded HTML attachments with a bunch of javascript
in them.
http://pastebin.com/ZSmW0kwW
They're not really from Yahoo. No
στις 17/09/2010 05:55 μμ, O/H Lawren Quigley-Jones έγραψε:
I've been repeatedly running into problems where dns white-lists have
been causing false negatives in spam. Valid looking headers are being
injected at the beginning of emails which are tripping dns whitelists
(see below). As a result
On 9/17/2010 10:55 AM, Lawren Quigley-Jones wrote:
> I've been repeatedly running into problems where dns white-lists have
> been causing false negatives in spam. Valid looking headers are being
> injected at the beginning of emails which are tripping dns whitelists
> (see below). As a result I'
Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Thu, September 16, 2010 15:57, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:36 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>> On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> >> http://public.jessen.ch/files/ma
I've been repeatedly running into problems where dns white-lists have
been causing false negatives in spam. Valid looking headers are being
injected at the beginning of emails which are tripping dns whitelists
(see below). As a result I've been slowly disabling dns whitelist rules:
score HABE
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Milind Patil wrote:
I run spamassassin via MailScanner and in the MailScanner I have
enabled the DNSBL check.
Ah, okay. I'm not familiar with MailScanner so I can't offer any advice.
Perhaps someone else can, or if there's a MailScanner list you might be
able to ask the
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:11:41 +0100
Steve Freegard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently I've been getting a bit of filter-bleed from a bunch of
> spams injected via Hotmail/Yahoo that contain shortened URLs e.g.
> bit.ly/foo that upon closer inspection would have been rejected with
> a high score if the
On 17/09/10 14:33, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
It has a typo.
describe URIBL_SHORT...
The rule name is wrong, should be SHORT_URIBL
Didn't you --lint it? ;)
Doh! - fixed.
Regards,
Steve.
On 17.9.2010 16:11, Steve Freegard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently I've been getting a bit of filter-bleed from a bunch of spams
> injected via Hotmail/Yahoo that contain shortened URLs e.g. bit.ly/foo
> that upon closer inspection would have been rejected with a high score
> if the real URL had bee
2010/9/17 Steve Freegard
> Hi All,
>
> Recently I've been getting a bit of filter-bleed from a bunch of spams
> injected via Hotmail/Yahoo that contain shortened URLs e.g. bit.ly/foothat
> upon closer inspection would have been rejected with a high score if
> the real URL had been used.
>
> To t
Hi All,
Recently I've been getting a bit of filter-bleed from a bunch of spams
injected via Hotmail/Yahoo that contain shortened URLs e.g. bit.ly/foo
that upon closer inspection would have been rejected with a high score
if the real URL had been used.
To that end - it annoyed me enough to wr
Brent Kennedy wrote:
> My setup looks something like this...I use postfix to strip the
> headers in emails.
That is helpful. This service will be ahead of Exchange in many instances
as well.
Brent Kennedy wrote:
> I know there are some ISP guys on this list who would know how to
> handle a cu
On 17/09/10 11:21, franc wrote:
In that case, uninstalling Spamassassin from Apt (and then doing an
apt-get --autoremove to clear out Perl libs installed through apt/dpkg)
and re-installing with CPAN should be fine, and you'll be able to keep
it up to date.
I use aptitude, is this the
στις 17/09/2010 12:55 μμ, O/H Dominic Benson έγραψε:
On 17/09/10 10:42, franc wrote:
I doubt if this is possible on a VPS. At least the kernel is not
changeable
because coming from the host and is old enough (2.6.9). I guess an
update to
Lucid Lynx (10.04) will be if not unpossible but problem
> In that case, uninstalling Spamassassin from Apt (and then doing an
> apt-get --autoremove to clear out Perl libs installed through apt/dpkg)
> and re-installing with CPAN should be fine, and you'll be able to keep
> it up to date.
I use aptitude, is this the same then? Will this uninstall a
On 17/09/10 10:42, franc wrote:
I doubt if this is possible on a VPS. At least the kernel is not changeable
because coming from the host and is old enough (2.6.9). I guess an update to
Lucid Lynx (10.04) will be if not unpossible but problematic.
So if i use CPAN and keep my Hardy Heron, there w
>
> If you can, upgrade to Lucid. If you can't - and don't ever plan to
> upgrade the machine to a later Ubuntu release - then you could uninstall
> and then install via CPAN, but I would fairly strongly recommend against
> doing that if you have any intention of upgrading it in the future. In
This is just what i noticed: there is no Ubuntu package update after the
3.2.4-ubu1 related to:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/hardy/spamassassin
But how then to update? Can i use a package for Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) or
is this the absolute wrong way?
If you add hardy-backports to your a
Hi , in you sources.list you have 2 lines
#deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main restricted
universe multiverse
#deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-backports main
restricted universe multiverse
Uncomment that lines and try to
apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
25 matches
Mail list logo
