Since a rule update on or around September 21st, we've been getting lots
of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
majority of cases.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
NHS
On 9/20/10 11:33 AM, Steve Freegard wrote:
On 20/09/10 15:28, Bowie Bailey wrote:
You can get rid of the 'backslashitis' by using a different delimiter.
uri URI_BITLY_BLOCKED m~^http://bit\.ly/a/warning~i
You still need to escape the period, but since the tilde (~) is now the
delimiter
On 22.09.10 13:05, Randal, Phil wrote:
Since a rule update on or around September 21st, we've been getting lots
of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
majority of cases.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
no, unless you provide some
On 9/22/10 8:05 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
Since a rule update on or around September 21^st , we’ve been getting
lots of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
majority of cases.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Sure. Give me the root
OK, sorry for the noise.
It was apparently collateral damage from a typo in one of my own rules.
Note to self. Test rules using spamassassin -t against an email, and
not spamassassin --lint.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
NHS Herefordshire Herefordshire Council | Deputy
On 22/09/10 13:44, Michael Scheidell wrote:
one more: if # url_shortener_cache /tmp/DecodeShortURLs.sq3
you should not try to load SQLLite.pm.
ent host [79.98.90.156] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org;
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=79.98.90.156;
from=madeirau...@rossatogroup.com
On ons 22 sep 2010 14:05:56 CEST, Randal, Phil wrote
Since a rule update on or around September 21st, we've been getting lots
of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
majority of cases.
show a sample, no one here have crystall balls
Can
On ons 22 sep 2010 17:07:46 CEST, John Hardin wrote
can you reduce your sig ?
Probably not if he's posting from a commercial or government account.
road to hell is filled with bad excuseses :)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
