Le 07/10/2010 17:24, Marc Perkel a écrit :
On 10/7/2010 7:56 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
* Marc Perkel:
Got this listing on sorbs:
On 07.10.10 16:33, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
No idea. We also got listed and can't even find out why. It says "last
occurence somedate.in.2006" - WTF?
o
Does anybody have or know of SA syntax (highlighting) definition for
BBedit (Mac) ?
If yes, would you share?
Thanks
Please keep list posts on-list.
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 12:27 -0400, Dennis German wrote:
> > Formail is your friend. To correctly extract all X-Spam headers, use
> > formail -X, and to remove them use -I instead of -X.
> >
> > formail -X X-Spam < $msg
> >
> > However, there is no need to remove
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 11:35 -0400, Dennis German wrote:
> #first run use
> echo setting aside user_prefs, running with system wide values
> mv ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ~/.spamassassin/user_prefss
> cp ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.rptonly ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
> grep -iv X-SPAM $1 | spamc >
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 11:35 -0400, Dennis German wrote:
> The question is: Has anyone seen unpredictable and different results
> when processing the same message?
No.
> The operative part of the script is:
>
> #first run use
> echo setting aside user_prefs, running with system wide values
> mv
There is at least one problem with my script, NOT spamassassin.
I did not expect the results to be in different order.
The grep -A14 'pts rule name' may not display all the errors.
Sorry 'bout that.
Dennis
On 10/9/10 11:35 AM, Dennis German wrote:
The question is: Has anyone seen unpredictable and different results when
processing the same message?
Sure. if your setup is messed up, you will get unpredictable results.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
> *|
The question is: Has anyone seen unpredictable and different results when
processing the same message?
The operative part of the script is:
#first run use
echo setting aside user_prefs, running with system wide values
mv ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ~/.spamassassin/user_prefss
cp ~/.spamassassin
corpus.defero wrote:
> This is all OT for a Spamassassin. If you want to bitch about
> blocklists why not do it on SPAM-L or at NANAE?
I'm not bitching about anything.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:58 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> corpus.defero wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:13 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> corpus.defero wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 08:56 -1000, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> >> >> Indeed no IP should be blacklisted undefinitely... at
corpus.defero wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:13 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> corpus.defero wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 08:56 -1000, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
>> >> Indeed no IP should be blacklisted undefinitely... at least
>> >> without checking regularily.
>> > I don't agree. An IP
11 matches
Mail list logo