Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.11.10 08:23, Per Jessen wrote:
I got the following reject this morning:
book...@example.com: host mail.example.com[1.2.3.4] said: 550
Dynamic
Style reverse DNS IP=[212.25.14.40].Rejected by MagicSpam
1.0.4-9.1 (http://www.magicspam.com/).
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:48:52 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 05.11.10 12:28, RW wrote:
It's not all that safe to deep-parse XBL because it's mostly
dynamically assigned IP addresses.
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:38:45 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11/10/2010 6:32 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 11/10/10 2:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.11.10 08:23, Per Jessen wrote:
I got the following reject this morning:
book...@example.com: host mail.example.com[1.2.3.4] said: 550 Dynamic
Style reverse DNS
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:48:52 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
can IP addresses in PBL get onto XBL?
On 10.11.10 08:46, RW wrote:
Yes, some servers reject on XBL, but not on PBL.
I was more interested iun spamhaus practice.
And not rejecting mail from PBL at SMTP level
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:57 -0800, Karl Meyer wrote:
This is dangerous. With lots of mail in the (Maildir?) folder, shell
expansion *quickly* will exceed the command line length limit.
The trailing dot also looks bad.
This is a good argument. I' ll think about that. The folder is a
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:57 -0800, Karl Meyer wrote:
This is dangerous. With lots of mail in the (Maildir?) folder, shell
expansion *quickly* will exceed the command line length limit.
The trailing dot also looks bad.
This is a good argument. I' ll think about that. The folder is a cyrus
Lee Dilkie wrote:
On 11/10/2010 6:32 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 11/10/10 2:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.11.10 08:23, Per Jessen wrote:
I got the following reject this morning:
book...@example.com: host mail.example.com[1.2.3.4] said: 550
Dynamic
Style reverse DNS
On 11/10/10 2:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.11.10 08:23, Per Jessen wrote:
I got the following reject this morning:
book...@example.com: host mail.example.com[1.2.3.4] said: 550 Dynamic
Style reverse DNS IP=[212.25.14.40].Rejected by MagicSpam 1.0.4-9.1
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:57 -0800, Karl Meyer wrote:
--showdots /var/spool/imap/user/kmeyer/[0-9]*. amavis
^^^
This is dangerous. With lots of mail in the (Maildir?) folder, shell
expansion *quickly* will exceed the command line length limit.
find /var/spool/imap/user/kmeyer/ -name '[0-9]*.' -exec sa_learn {} \;
which is a bit slower but avoids the command line overflow by running
sa_learn on every matching file.
A bit slower. Periodically re-learning the entire Inbox of 100+ users,
spawning a full Perl process for every
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 2010-11-10 07:37, Karl Meyer pisze:
But the 15 new messages weren't learnd yet.
I had 10 messages in my inbox and run sa-learn on that folder. Then I got 15
different new messages and re-run sa-learn again. But it said that
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 18:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
find /var/spool/imap/user/kmeyer/ -name '[0-9]*.' -exec sa_learn {} \;
which is a bit slower but avoids the command line overflow by running
sa_learn on every matching file.
A bit slower. Periodically re-learning the
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:48 +, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 18:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
find /var/spool/imap/user/kmeyer/ -name '[0-9]*.' -exec sa_learn {} \;
which is a bit slower but avoids the command line overflow by running
sa_learn on every
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:01 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:48 +, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 18:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
find /var/spool/imap/user/kmeyer/ -name '[0-9]*.' -exec sa_learn {} \;
which is a bit slower but
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 18:04 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:57 -0800, Karl Meyer wrote:
Using the Inbox rather than a dedicated ham folder therefore is NOT a
good idea.
The problem is, that I can't persuade about 120 users to store all their ham
below a
I've enabled SA on my RE 5 ES server by putting the following line in
/etc/procmailrc
INCLUDERC=/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin-default.rc
and I start the SA daemon.
No on my server I have a hard requirement to run SELinux. I cannot turn that
off. I find that when i enable SA with
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 11:25 +0200, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
We are having a problema with one of our users that all his email was
marked as spam. The problem is that all his emails has the
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR (or HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2) check, because
spamassassin thinks that the connection used
Do not reply, if you want to start a new thread. Changing the Subject
and removing the quote does not make it a new mail. It still is a
reply, indicated by the In-Reply-To and References headers. You just
hijacked a thread.
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 11:39 -0800, John Williams wrote:
I've enabled SA
18 matches
Mail list logo
