Hello Marcin Mirosław,
Am 2011-03-07 14:08:01, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Please look at it:
$ host -t mx tamay-dogan.net
tamay-dogan.net mail is handled by 20 vserver04.tamay-dogan.net.
$ host vserver04.tamay-dogan.net.
vserver04.tamay-dogan.net has address 217.147.94.23
^^
$
Hello David B Funk,
Am 2011-03-07 18:18:48, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Even more fun:
# host vserver4.tamay-dogan.net.
Host vserver4.tamay-dogan.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
fix that reverse map for 217.147.94.23 and I bet you will be happier.
:-/
Thanks, Greetings and nice
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
Even if we don't change what AWL means,
Curious that in English awl is a tool of the shoe-maker (in italian
called lesina : since it was used to cut off tiny pieces, it even
generated a verb lesinare which means to save money at the point to be
stingy
Already sometimes we've had problems with
false positives
Mails get spam scores 5 ...internal mails with normal content...
The spam report says
X-Spam-Score: 5.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Start SpamAssassin results
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
On 3/8/11 10:45 AM, Margrit Lottmann wrote:
Already sometimes we've had problems with
false positives
Mails get spam scores 5 ...internal mails with normal content...
you need to correctly set internal and trusted networks.
if that is correct, you need to fix your MTA.
use wirewhark to
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/8/11 10:45 AM, Margrit Lottmann wrote:
Already sometimes we've had problems with
false positives
Mails get spam scores 5 ...internal mails with normal content...
you need to correctly set internal and trusted networks.
if that is
Margrit Lottmann wrote:
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.5 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
-0.0
FYI: Spamhaus created a new URL shortener/redirector zone in the
DBL. See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response code?:
127.0.1.3 spammed redirector domain
For details, see:
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_SPAM')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR Contains a URL listed in the DBL as a
spammed redirector
On 08/03/2011 4:54 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_SPAM')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR
On 2011-03-08 21:24, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_SPAM')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR
On 08/03/2011 5:12 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2011-03-08 21:24, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like that would be something like this?
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR dbl.spamhaus.org. A
127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR
On 2011-03-08 20:58, Bill Landry wrote:
FYI: Spamhaus created a new URL shortener/redirector zone in the
DBL. See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response code?:
127.0.1.3 spammed redirector domain
For
On 03/08, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR')
Thanks. Looks like the way to go about getting this in SA is opening a bug
to get it tested via mass checks, so I did:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6550
--
Force, my friends, is violence;
On 03/08, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
http://pastebin.com/CdDPHnTX
It doesn't look like it's working.
$ host dbltest.com.dbl.spamhaus.org
dbltest.com.dbl.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.1.2
Good.
$ host rdrct.us.dbl.spamhaus.org
Host rdrct.us.dbl.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
$ host
On Mar 8, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Dunno if mirrors are beign served the same data atm.. seems so.
My mirror is also commented out.
Chris
--
-
Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery
On 3/8/2011 9:58 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
FYI: Spamhaus created a new URL shortener/redirector zone in the
DBL. See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response code?:
127.0.1.3 spammed redirector domain
For
On 2011-03-08 22:12, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 3/8/2011 9:58 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
FYI: Spamhaus created a new URL shortener/redirector zone in the
DBL. See:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=667
Will Spamassassin be adding support for this new DBL
shortener/redirector response
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Spamhaus%20DBL#291
quote,
One way to address this problem would have been to treat URL shortener
domains the same way as any other spammed domain and include them in our
main DBL zone. But, as mentioned, most of these URL shortener
On 2011-03-08 22:28, Joseph Brennan wrote:
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Spamhaus%20DBL#291
quote,
One way to address this problem would have been to treat URL shortener
domains the same way as any other spammed domain and include them in our
main DBL zone. But, as
On 03/08/2011 01:46 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
I'll never grasp why one would use one of those in mail.
Many shortened links allow you to anonymously track click-throughs
(clicks-through?), e.g. adding a plus sign to any bit.ly or j.mp URI
will bring anybody to the stats (and target) of the
On 3/8/2011 4:46 PM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
I'll never grasp why one would use one of those in mail.
Many legitimate social networks auto-generate shortened URLs. These then
get copied into e-mails... sometimes in automated ways, sometimes via
people copying a twitter post (or whatever) and
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help. I had helped some, but finally told him to
add me to his distribution (he uses BCC lists;
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help. I had helped some, but finally told him to
add me to his distribution (he uses
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a clearinghouse
for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and finally
came to me for help.
Oh, and I am looking at setting up a mailman
25 matches
Mail list logo
