Am 2011-04-05 03:29:44, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I'm not sure I understand this bit. From what I see on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host, I already use a smart host, in
that the SMTP server specified in my mail client is not an open relay. Or is
there more to this?
On
Hello Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
Am 2011-04-10 15:00:53, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
SA never rejects messages. Your problem must lie elsewhere...
The problem is, it scores to high FOR ME! I have checked others and it
is working correctly, but if I send from my IP at free.fr it is OK,
not
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:59:29 +0200, Michelle Konzack
linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:30:46 -0400
Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote:
header __MANY_SENDER sender =~ /@.*@/
Trying to match email addresses with regexes is dangerous. The string:
funny@last@roaringpenguin.com
is a valid email address. Check the RFCs if you don't
Hi!
I hope someone can help me with this issue. At our company we are building a
mass mailing application. We have taken every measure to ensure that our
clients aren't sending spam to their clients, but one section of our
application still has potential of sending spam, which we do not want.
On Apr 9, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in this rule. So I
guess SpamAssassin
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, rokdominko wrote:
The problem is, we want to tell our client exactly which words, phrases
or sentences are problematic, so we need Spamassassin to return the list
of these words, phrases or sentences, so that we can tell our client
what exactly is wrong with their
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
back on topic... is there a way to lower the score for a particular
ruleset for certain hosts/clients?
I assume you don't want to just use whitelist_from_rcvd for this?
An alternative would be to write a header rule that checks the last
external
Le samedi 09 avril 2011 à 15:04 -0700, John Hardin a écrit :
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, David Touzeau wrote:
Le samedi 09 avril 2011 à 08:59 -0700, John Hardin a écrit :
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote:
This to manage a quarantine area.
Rejecting the message cause troubles according
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, David Touzeau wrote:
It's possible your MTA inserts a Content-Length: header before SA sees the
message. If so, then checking it is fairly trivial. Try to determine
whether your MTA does this.
If not, SA does not currently (that I can find) expose the raw size of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
