On Sat, 21 May 2011 19:37:19 -0700, Quinn Comendant wrote:
> We have a client on our mail server who occasionally and randomly
> receives emails which contain nothing other than the output from
> `spamc --help`
I found the cause of this problem. The client was using a catch-all address,
and was
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Jezz wrote:
So here's the thing: I'm actually running SA on Windows, via the MDaemon
mail server. So I can't so easily create a symlink as you've described.
http://lifehacker.com/5496652/how-to-use-symlinks-in-windows
But then, this is just FYI as Justin is fixing the pro
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:38 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> > > Would renaming 20_sought_fraud.cf to 99_sought_fraud.cf, putting
> > > 20_sought_fraud.cf (from the yelp.org channel) after 72_active.cf (the
> > > default and assumed older SA rules) solve this problem?
> Is Lawrence's suggestion s
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 12:50 +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> drwxrwxr-x. 2 root root 4096 Jun 11 12:19 sought_rules_yerp_org
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 root root 120 Jun 11 12:19 sought_rules_yerp_org.cf
> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Jun 11 12:17 updates_spamassassin_org
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2599 Jun 11 12:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 20:01 +0200, Jezz wrote:
> So currently I'm thinking about this plan: I could create a file called
> 'zz_sought.cf' and place it into my /rules directory where it's safe. AFAIK
> the files in here would be parsed *after* the files inside the
> /default_rules directory - at
guys -- I'm going to make the whole question moot (in trunk at least)
-- the only reason SOUGHT and SOUGHT_FRAUD were being checked in there
was to make their accuracy visible in ruleqa. It's been months since
I've looked at that, so it's needless. I'll remove them from svn
asap.
--j.
2011/6/11
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 23:13 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> Wait a sec, I'm confused about this. "JM_SOUGHT_2 hitting on every
> legit Facebook message" on dev@ list February 17th 2011. If the SOUGHT
> channel was being overridden by the sa-update rules, how would this
> problem appear from
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 06:45 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 6/10/11 1:14 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > This merely requires a re-ordering hack, though. A symlink zzz_sought.cf
> > in your rule updates dir, pointing at the channel generated cf should
> > do. These channel cf files only hol
On 6/10/2011 11:13 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Wait a sec, I'm confused about this. "JM_SOUGHT_2 hitting on every legit
Facebook message" on dev@ list February 17th 2011. If the SOUGHT channel
was being overridden by the sa-update rules, how would this problem
appear from the SOUGHT channel? Doe
"Karsten Bräckelmann" wrote in message
news:1307726044.7307.29.camel@monkey...
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 18:07 +0200, Jezz wrote:
I recently upgraded SpamAssassin from 3.2.5 to 3.3.1, and I discovered
that
the JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_x rules are now included within the official ruleset,
within the 72_ac
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/10/11 9:56 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
spamassassin -D config --lint 2>&1 | less
so, one MORE option, we don't need to add the symlink to crontab?
Jun 11 06:39:13.419 [71425] dbg: config: read file
/var/db/spamassassin/3.003001/sought_ru
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 06:45 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 6/10/11 9:56 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > spamassassin -D config --lint 2>&1 | less
> so, one MORE option, we don't need to add the symlink to crontab?
>
> Jun 11 06:39:13.419 [71425] dbg: config: read file
> /var/db/spamassas
On 6/11/11 6:45 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/10/11 9:56 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
spamassassin -D config --lint 2>&1 | less
so, one MORE option, we don't need to add the symlink to crontab?
Jun 11 06:39:13.419 [71425] dbg: config: read file
/var/db/spamassassin/3.003001/sought_rules
On 6/10/11 9:56 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
spamassassin -D config --lint 2>&1 | less
so, one MORE option, we don't need to add the symlink to crontab?
Jun 11 06:39:13.419 [71425] dbg: config: read file
/var/db/spamassassin/3.003001/sought_rules_yerp_org.cf
Jun 11 06:39:13.419 [71425] dbg:
Wait a sec, I'm confused about this. "JM_SOUGHT_2 hitting on every
legit Facebook message" on dev@ list February 17th 2011. If the SOUGHT
channel was being overridden by the sa-update rules, how would this
problem appear from the SOUGHT channel? Doesn't this suggest that
spamassassin was suc
On 2011-06-11 3:38, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 6/10/2011 3:34 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 10/06/2011 10:24 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 6/10/2011 2:01 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > IFF you use the sought channel with SA 3.3.x, you will need
16 matches
Mail list logo
