Am 11.01.2012 23:37, schrieb Rob McEwen:
> On 1/11/2012 5:10 PM, David B Funk wrote:
>> Problem with all those methods is that they're reactive, will not hit
>> until -after- somebody has seen the bad crap and created filers,
>> RBL-lists, taught Bayes, etc.
>>
>> The OP explicitly said that the fi
> "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes:
MS> On 1/11/12 9:35 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
MS> Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
MS> Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
MS> I meant your ve
On 01/12, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes:
> MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
> Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
> Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
I don't remember what that update was for,
On 1/11/12 9:35 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
I meant your version of spamassassin.
3.3.2 was updated yesterday.
if you do
> "MS" == Michael Scheidell writes:
MS> #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
On 1/11/2012 2:10 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Problem with all those methods is that they're reactive, will not hit
until -after- somebody has seen the bad crap and created filers,
RBL-lists, taught Bayes, etc.
The OP explicitly said that the first spam run was at 06:39 and by
06:42 it was hitting
On 1/11/2012 5:10 PM, David B Funk wrote:
> Problem with all those methods is that they're reactive, will not hit
> until -after- somebody has seen the bad crap and created filers,
> RBL-lists, taught Bayes, etc.
>
> The OP explicitly said that the first spam run was at 06:39 and by
> 06:42 it was
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Ken A wrote:
On 1/11/2012 11:51 AM, Dave Funk wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having
their adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites.
sanesecurity hits many of these.
uri filt
On 1/11/2012 11:51 AM, Dave Funk wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having
their adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites.
sanesecurity hits many of these.
uri filters can also assist.. surbl, uribl
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having their
adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites. Bayes is being
by-passed due to the content looking valid so it is coming down to the IPs and
domains. Had one yesterda
Am 11.01.2012 12:57, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
> The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having their
> adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites. Bayes is being
> by-passed due to the content looking valid so it is coming down to the IPs
> and domains. Had one y
On 11/01/12 12:38, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 11.01.2012 12:28, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the
>> community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings.
>> We are currently using:
>>
>> Barracuda
>> SpamRats
>
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having their
adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites. Bayes is being
by-passed due to the content looking valid so it is coming down to the IPs and
domains. Had one yesterday where at 06:39 it was received by one of ou
Am 11.01.2012 12:28, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
> Hi,
>
> we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the
> community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings.
> We are currently using:
>
> Barracuda
> SpamRats
> JunkEmailFilter
> SpamEatingMonkey
never used this
On 2012-01-11 12:28, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the
community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL
offerings. We are currently using:
Barracuda SpamRats JunkEmailFilter SpamEatingMonkey
Plus the standard ones that are che
Hi,
we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the community for
recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings. We are currently
using:
Barracuda
SpamRats
JunkEmailFilter
SpamEatingMonkey
Plus the standard ones that are checked with SpamAssassin. We are also
These are the headers
http://pastebin.com/udbDgJ8L
Seems to have come from google , but is spam.
I cant even read the language :)
17 matches
Mail list logo
