On 4/22/2012 8:31 PM, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
a) phishers would probably move to hosting their own copies of the logos
Yup. However, spammers haven't completely adapted to greylisting, and
still spam from SBL/ZEN listed IPs, so perhaps this would catch some of
the long-hanging fruit?
Hey guys!
If there is a lot of virtual domains with many virtual users in it,
which is the better variant of configuration spamassassin about spam/ham:
- individual database for each of users
- or the same database for all of supported domains
And If I can I have one more question: is
On 4/22/2012 at 10:29 PM, Dave Funk dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, joea wrote:
Attempting to simplify my life, looked to ways to forward ham and spam to
the spamassassin box and have it look a them, without further intervention on
my part.
The link
Dave Warren wrote:
b) some users of image resizers would see the warning sign reduced
(I recently had someone complain about an error on our google maps our
office is here
page, and it turned out the visitor was using a smartphone via an image
resize service)
Were you tripping on a lack
On 2012-04-23 12:23, Николай Г. Петров wrote:
If there is a lot of virtual domains with many virtual users in it,
which is the better variant of configuration spamassassin about spam/ham:
- individual database for each of users
- or the same database for all of supported domains
You
23.04.2012 15:40, Jonas Eckerman написал:
On 2012-04-23 12:23, Николай Г. Петров wrote:
If there is a lot of virtual domains with many virtual users in it,
which is the better variant of configuration spamassassin about
spam/ham:
- individual database for each of users
- or the same
On 4/23/2012 4:41 AM, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
Now thinking about the bank situation: the bank's webserver would see a request
from the resizing service, but it is up to the resizer to behave like a
real browser, or a proper http proxy
That's basically what I'm thinking. If the service
Den 2012-04-24 03:46, Dave Warren skrev:
It's only when there's an incorrect referrer that you can assume the
request isn't legitimate and you should return something different.
or banks care to send the image over https protocol not just http
Whether you do this immediately or have someone
