On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
This is what e.g. rfci-ignorant or many other rhsbl blacklists are
for.
rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
-- Matthias
Matthias Leisi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
This is what e.g. rfci-ignorant or many other rhsbl blacklists are
for.
rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
-- Matthias
Thanks, I didn't know someone had decided
On 2/5/2013 6:22 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
-- Matthias
Thanks, I didn't know someone had decided to continue the project. I
suggested it on the rfc-ignorant mailing list but there wasn't much
interest.
Interesting and good news!... but their home page states
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
hide text? Seems like there should be.
FONT COLOR=#FF
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:17:46 -0800
Marc Perkel supp...@junkemailfilter.com wrote:
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
hide text? Seems like there should be.
FONT COLOR=#FF
Going down that path leads to madness. Then you have to worry about:
font
Le 05/02/2013 16:20, Marc Perkel a écrit :
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
Yep - tflags RULENAME noautolearn
John.
--
-- Over 5000 webcams from ski resorts around the world - www.snoweye.com
--
Hi Mark,
maybe this works. This I stole it from someone who posted
here.
# HTML - White text on a white background. What is the
point?
rawbody HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT /style=.color#FFF;/
describe
HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT White html txt on white bg
score
HTML_TEXT_WHITE_SHORT 0.1
Simon
---
I
On 2/5/2013 10:23 AM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 05/02/2013 16:20, Marc Perkel a écrit :
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
Yep - tflags RULENAME noautolearn
That just tells SA to ignore this rule when
On 02/05/2013 04:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
What causes bayes poisoning? (except bad custom high scored rules)
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to hide
text? Seems like there should be.
FONT COLOR=#FF
Yes. HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, David F. Skoll wrote:
etc. To do it properly, you have to re-implement
On 2/5/2013 8:08 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
hide text? Seems like there should be.
FONT COLOR=#FF
Yes. HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, David F. Skoll wrote:
etc. To
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 2/5/2013 8:08 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there some sort of rule to catch white text on white background to
hide text? Seems like there should be.
FONT COLOR=#FF
Yes. HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST.
On
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:08:47 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
It is implemented in the HTML parsing plugin so that's not a great
concern.
Does that plugin understand CSS? Things like:
body.someclass p.something span { display: none; }
I'd surely be impressed if that's
I feel like this comes up often enough, people not having trusted_networks
or internal_networks set.
Probably for most people it's unnecessary. But if you have some server
relaying / forwarding mail to your server, and you don't have one of these
set, spamassassin is using the IP address of
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:42:45 -0800
Marc Perkel supp...@junkemailfilter.com wrote:
Yes - here's a sample. Hope it gets through.
Scored very high on Bayes for me. Here are the probabilities of words
and word-pairs reported by our Bayes engine:
Word: Although+escaped (0.990)
Word: Later+career
Per Jessen skrev den 2013-02-05 08:27:
rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
thats why i choiced to use reject_unverified_sender in postfix, and yes
i know it can be abused, but it solves more problems then it creates for
me
was the plan not to get it up again ?
Matthias Leisi skrev den 2013-02-05 10:43:
rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
will it not be added to spamassassin rules ?
is the old rules still in rules out there ?
i have not followed progress on that, have being away from maillist for
long time now
Marc Perkel skrev den 2013-02-05 16:20:
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes
not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
tflags foo-rule noautolearn
Axb skrev den 2013-02-05 16:30:
On 02/05/2013 04:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes
not
to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning?
What causes bayes poisoning? (except bad custom high scored rules)
+1
worst case is
Thanks for the reminder . . .
joe a.
On 2/5/2013 at 1:03 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I feel like this comes up often enough, people not having trusted_networks
or internal_networks set.
Probably for most people it's unnecessary. But if you have some server
relaying / forwarding
Benny Pedersen wrote:
Per Jessen skrev den 2013-02-05 08:27:
rfc-ignorant has gone off-line.
thats why i choiced to use reject_unverified_sender in postfix, and
yes i know it can be abused, but it solves more problems then it
creates for me
For me that creates too much traffic,
22 matches
Mail list logo
