Thanks for your answer Michael.
Yes you are right, using sa-learn --sync as one of the user SA will create
the proper record on the bayes_vars table.
So I guess this is only a problem of having not received enough ham/spam email
with this user.
Matteo
Da:
So i was able to write a plugin that overrides the AWL
check_from_in_auto_whitelist() eval rule. Thanks for the help Karsten.
= /etc/spamassassin/25_AwlIgnore.cf
##AWL ignore address types (periods in names are not supported)
## @see AwlIgnore.pm
awl_ignore_from postmaster
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
What would be the best method of get somewhat up to date SA to this box?
--
You can rent this space for only $5 a week.
signature.asc
Description:
On 5/10/2013 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
What would be the best method of get somewhat up to date SA to this box?
rpmforge has SA 3.3.2.
pyzor and perl-Razor-Agent are in epel.
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
Sent: 10 May 2013 17:22
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: OT: installing on CentOS 6.4
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my
10.05.2013 19:27, Bowie Bailey kirjoitti:
On 5/10/2013 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
What would be the best method of get somewhat up to date SA
On 5/10/2013 1:09 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
10.05.2013 19:27, Bowie Bailey kirjoitti:
On 5/10/2013 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
What would be
You all are keeping me sane and grounded as I deal with the Powers That Be
here trying to set this up. It's good to know that I'm not wrong (I agree
with everything everyone has said, and pointed out from the beginning a
default database would be awful).
And this: If he insists on starting with
On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:32:26 +0200
Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
- your HAM is somebody else's SPAM
Do you have evidence for that? The reason I ask is that one of the
main features of our (commercial) anti-spam solution is a very large
Bayes database. Once a night, we aggregate all the
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 15:51 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:32:26 +0200 Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
- your HAM is somebody else's SPAM
Do you have evidence for that?
Evidence... examples, rather.
I happened to be the lucky recipient of specific spam campaigns in
David F. Skoll wrote:
Axb wrote:
- your HAM is somebody else's SPAM
Do you have evidence for that? The reason I ask is that one of the
main features of our (commercial) anti-spam solution is a very large
Bayes database. Once a night, we aggregate all the tokens from votes from
all of
On Fri, 10 May 2013 15:34:13 -0600
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
The weasel words agrees substantially is telling. If it isn't 100%
with no false positives then at least one of those messages does not
agree. That would be the evidence requested.
I am not saying that your technique
On Fri, 10 May 2013 23:14:36 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
I happened to be the lucky recipient of specific spam campaigns in
languages I do not speak. Campaign referring to quite a few samples
during a specific, relatively short time period. This definitely
happened
Hello,
I was curious if somebody out there publishes a Spamassassin Bayes SPAM/HAM
data base that someone could buy or subscribe to? If so, please provide
details if known.
Thanks,
Rick
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:42:21PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
That's strange. Now that I actually try to install it myself, I see
the same thing (my home server uses this repo, but I haven't updated
in a while). But if you follow the link for the list of packages on
the wiki page, it lists
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 08:57 -0700, psychobyte wrote:
So i was able to write a plugin that overrides the AWL
check_from_in_auto_whitelist() eval rule. Thanks for the help Karsten.
You're welcome. Was actually fun digging through the code.
# awl_ignore_from postmaster mailer-daemon
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 17:58 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 23:14:36 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
We (probably) have a much larger sample population, so this tends not
to be as much of a problem for us.
This thread is about a default Bayes database, suitable for distri-
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 16:02 -0600, Rick Cone wrote:
I was curious if somebody out there publishes a Spamassassin Bayes
SPAM/HAM data base that someone could buy or subscribe to? If so,
please provide details if known.
Wow, I'm floored.
Reading the last 3 days worth of posts might get you a
On Fri, 10 May 2013, David F. Skoll wrote:
Anyway, my main point is this: Don't dismiss a shared Bayes database
without supplying evidence that it's a bad idea. :)
Care to share your database? :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
David F. Skoll wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
And would you suggest distributing your well-averaged database to
people who install SpamAssassin to as to seed their Bayes?
We have a distribution mechanism built into our software.
I think having users start with a blank slate and then start
11.05.2013 01:03, John R. Dennison kirjoitti:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:42:21PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
That's strange. Now that I actually try to install it myself, I see
the same thing (my home server uses this repo, but I haven't updated
in a while). But if you follow the link for the
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 17:49 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
Right; pretend you're a salesperson trying to sell an anti-spam product.
Oh, you just have to go through your old mailbox and classify a few
hundred messages by hand... then the system will work great!
No sale.
Most likely, and no one
10.05.2013 19:31, Randal, Phil kirjoitti:
pyzor and perl-Razor-Agent are in epel.
Cheers,
Phil
Epel is a must, wonder how I forgot it. Now I have it, and those and
running. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
Sent: 10 May 2013 17:22
To:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 15:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
Anyway, my main point is this: Don't dismiss a shared Bayes database
without supplying evidence that it's a bad idea. :)
Care to share your database? :)
Ah... hmm. :)
I would be happy to share it with SA
24 matches
Mail list logo
